OAN interview with Chris Hull PhD, senior fellow at Americans for Intelligence Reform

For the entire transcript of this interview, please continue reading.

1
00:00:00,000 –> 00:00:02,659
this particular revelation is very

2
00:00:02,659 –> 00:00:02,669
this particular revelation is very

3
00:00:02,669 –> 00:00:04,730
this particular revelation is very
troubling what we’ve got here is on

4
00:00:04,730 –> 00:00:04,740
troubling what we’ve got here is on

5
00:00:04,740 –> 00:00:08,390
troubling what we’ve got here is on
April 11th 2017 Andrew Weissman who was

6
00:00:08,390 –> 00:00:08,400
April 11th 2017 Andrew Weissman who was

7
00:00:08,400 –> 00:00:12,950
April 11th 2017 Andrew Weissman who was
a member of Muller’s team met with The

8
00:00:12,950 –> 00:00:12,960
a member of Muller’s team met with The

9
00:00:12,960 –> 00:00:14,629
a member of Muller’s team met with The
Associated Press reporters and walked

10
00:00:14,629 –> 00:00:14,639
Associated Press reporters and walked

11
00:00:14,639 –> 00:00:16,340
Associated Press reporters and walked
them through this black cash ledger

12
00:00:16,340 –> 00:00:16,350
them through this black cash ledger

13
00:00:16,350 –> 00:00:20,029
them through this black cash ledger
which they didn’t they knew was not

14
00:00:20,029 –> 00:00:20,039
which they didn’t they knew was not

15
00:00:20,039 –> 00:00:21,590
which they didn’t they knew was not
credible or should have known wasn’t

16
00:00:21,590 –> 00:00:21,600
credible or should have known wasn’t

17
00:00:21,600 –> 00:00:23,720
credible or should have known wasn’t
credible this the report comes out the

18
00:00:23,720 –> 00:00:23,730
credible this the report comes out the

19
00:00:23,730 –> 00:00:27,620
credible this the report comes out the
next day and then Weissman’s team cites

20
00:00:27,620 –> 00:00:27,630
next day and then Weissman’s team cites

21
00:00:27,630 –> 00:00:31,250
next day and then Weissman’s team cites
the AP story that they sourced in this

22
00:00:31,250 –> 00:00:31,260
the AP story that they sourced in this

23
00:00:31,260 –> 00:00:34,790
the AP story that they sourced in this
document write this this is it appears

24
00:00:34,790 –> 00:00:34,800
document write this this is it appears

25
00:00:34,800 –> 00:00:37,700
document write this this is it appears
to be a deliberate attempt not to use a

26
00:00:37,700 –> 00:00:37,710
to be a deliberate attempt not to use a

27
00:00:37,710 –> 00:00:39,889
to be a deliberate attempt not to use a
document that they knew to be false by

28
00:00:39,889 –> 00:00:39,899
document that they knew to be false by

29
00:00:39,899 –> 00:00:42,049
document that they knew to be false by
using media report as well by the way

30
00:00:42,049 –> 00:00:42,059
using media report as well by the way

31
00:00:42,059 –> 00:00:44,690
using media report as well by the way
through this this report by John Solomon

32
00:00:44,690 –> 00:00:44,700
through this this report by John Solomon

33
00:00:44,700 –> 00:00:47,569
through this this report by John Solomon
also points out that Weissman’s team

34
00:00:47,569 –> 00:00:47,579
also points out that Weissman’s team

35
00:00:47,579 –> 00:00:51,920
also points out that Weissman’s team
never used this black cash ledger in

36
00:00:51,920 –> 00:00:51,930
never used this black cash ledger in

37
00:00:51,930 –> 00:00:55,430
never used this black cash ledger in
with the Grand Jury so they knew it was

38
00:00:55,430 –> 00:00:55,440
with the Grand Jury so they knew it was

39
00:00:55,440 –> 00:00:57,139
with the Grand Jury so they knew it was
false that implies that they knew it was

40
00:00:57,139 –> 00:00:57,149
false that implies that they knew it was

41
00:00:57,149 –> 00:01:00,260
false that implies that they knew it was
false but they put the story into the AP

42
00:01:00,260 –> 00:01:00,270
false but they put the story into the AP

43
00:01:00,270 –> 00:01:03,529
false but they put the story into the AP
and then used it in this used it in

44
00:01:03,529 –> 00:01:03,539
and then used it in this used it in

45
00:01:03,539 –> 00:01:06,289
and then used it in this used it in
their document anyway that according to

46
00:01:06,289 –> 00:01:06,299
their document anyway that according to

47
00:01:06,299 –> 00:01:08,929
their document anyway that according to
not just me but Alan Dershowitz liberal

48
00:01:08,929 –> 00:01:08,939
not just me but Alan Dershowitz liberal

49
00:01:08,939 –> 00:01:12,380
not just me but Alan Dershowitz liberal
lawyer Alan Dershowitz that he said is a

50
00:01:12,380 –> 00:01:12,390
lawyer Alan Dershowitz that he said is a

51
00:01:12,390 –> 00:01:16,010
lawyer Alan Dershowitz that he said is a
possible fraud well it’s a right whether

52
00:01:16,010 –> 00:01:16,020
possible fraud well it’s a right whether

53
00:01:16,020 –> 00:01:17,600
possible fraud well it’s a right whether
or not it counts under the elements of

54
00:01:17,600 –> 00:01:17,610
or not it counts under the elements of

55
00:01:17,610 –> 00:01:19,640
or not it counts under the elements of
criminal fraud it’s certainly ethical

56
00:01:19,640 –> 00:01:19,650
criminal fraud it’s certainly ethical

57
00:01:19,650 –> 00:01:21,859
criminal fraud it’s certainly ethical
fraud the thing is okay so this is a

58
00:01:21,859 –> 00:01:21,869
fraud the thing is okay so this is a

59
00:01:21,869 –> 00:01:24,020
fraud the thing is okay so this is a
very shady trick and it’s been exposed

60
00:01:24,020 –> 00:01:24,030
very shady trick and it’s been exposed

61
00:01:24,030 –> 00:01:26,570
very shady trick and it’s been exposed
and we can now see that it’s not the

62
00:01:26,570 –> 00:01:26,580
and we can now see that it’s not the

63
00:01:26,580 –> 00:01:28,429
and we can now see that it’s not the
only time that it’s been used the

64
00:01:28,429 –> 00:01:28,439
only time that it’s been used the

65
00:01:28,439 –> 00:01:30,950
only time that it’s been used the
intelligence community has done this

66
00:01:30,950 –> 00:01:30,960
intelligence community has done this

67
00:01:30,960 –> 00:01:32,600
intelligence community has done this
before they did it with Michael Isikoff

68
00:01:32,600 –> 00:01:32,610
before they did it with Michael Isikoff

69
00:01:32,610 –> 00:01:35,569
before they did it with Michael Isikoff
at Yahoo about the Christopher sealed

70
00:01:35,569 –> 00:01:35,579
at Yahoo about the Christopher sealed

71
00:01:35,579 –> 00:01:38,840
at Yahoo about the Christopher sealed
dossier as well to corroborate the

72
00:01:38,840 –> 00:01:38,850
dossier as well to corroborate the

73
00:01:38,850 –> 00:01:40,910
dossier as well to corroborate the
Christopher Steele dossier on the fly

74
00:01:40,910 –> 00:01:40,920
Christopher Steele dossier on the fly

75
00:01:40,920 –> 00:01:43,039
Christopher Steele dossier on the fly
sick court warrants they cited an

76
00:01:43,039 –> 00:01:43,049
sick court warrants they cited an

77
00:01:43,049 –> 00:01:46,190
sick court warrants they cited an
article written by Michael Isikoff yet

78
00:01:46,190 –> 00:01:46,200
article written by Michael Isikoff yet

79
00:01:46,200 –> 00:01:48,410
article written by Michael Isikoff yet
Christopher Steele was the source of

80
00:01:48,410 –> 00:01:48,420
Christopher Steele was the source of

81
00:01:48,420 –> 00:01:50,719
Christopher Steele was the source of
Michael of Michael Isikoff article about

82
00:01:50,719 –> 00:01:50,729
Michael of Michael Isikoff article about

83
00:01:50,729 –> 00:01:52,700
Michael of Michael Isikoff article about
the sealed dossier so they just looped

84
00:01:52,700 –> 00:01:52,710
the sealed dossier so they just looped

85
00:01:52,710 –> 00:01:54,319
the sealed dossier so they just looped
their own information through the media

86
00:01:54,319 –> 00:01:54,329
their own information through the media

87
00:01:54,329 –> 00:01:56,749
their own information through the media
and used and acted like the media had

88
00:01:56,749 –> 00:01:56,759
and used and acted like the media had

89
00:01:56,759 –> 00:01:58,760
and used and acted like the media had
independent sources when they were going

90
00:01:58,760 –> 00:01:58,770
independent sources when they were going

91
00:01:58,770 –> 00:02:00,380
independent sources when they were going
to use their own unverified information

92
00:02:00,380 –> 00:02:00,390
to use their own unverified information

93
00:02:00,390 –> 00:02:05,630
to use their own unverified information
as a weapon against Republicans exactly

94
00:02:05,630 –> 00:02:05,640
as a weapon against Republicans exactly

95
00:02:05,640 –> 00:02:07,969
as a weapon against Republicans exactly
and by the way Andrew Weissman has a

96
00:02:07,969 –> 00:02:07,979
and by the way Andrew Weissman has a

97
00:02:07,979 –> 00:02:11,240
and by the way Andrew Weissman has a
long history of activity like this this

98
00:02:11,240 –> 00:02:11,250
long history of activity like this this

99
00:02:11,250 –> 00:02:13,130
long history of activity like this this
is an individual who

100
00:02:13,130 –> 00:02:13,140
is an individual who

101
00:02:13,140 –> 00:02:15,080
is an individual who
he was the one who was responsible for

102
00:02:15,080 –> 00:02:15,090
he was the one who was responsible for

103
00:02:15,090 –> 00:02:16,520
he was the one who was responsible for
something that your viewers might

104
00:02:16,520 –> 00:02:16,530
something that your viewers might

105
00:02:16,530 –> 00:02:18,710
something that your viewers might
remember Liz which is the collapse of

106
00:02:18,710 –> 00:02:18,720
remember Liz which is the collapse of

107
00:02:18,720 –> 00:02:20,300
remember Liz which is the collapse of
Arthur Anderson after the Enron scandal

108
00:02:20,300 –> 00:02:20,310
Arthur Anderson after the Enron scandal

109
00:02:20,310 –> 00:02:25,340
Arthur Anderson after the Enron scandal
now I was involved in in that in the

110
00:02:25,340 –> 00:02:25,350
now I was involved in in that in the

111
00:02:25,350 –> 00:02:27,920
now I was involved in in that in the
attempt to help that company and I

112
00:02:27,920 –> 00:02:27,930
attempt to help that company and I

113
00:02:27,930 –> 00:02:30,320
attempt to help that company and I
remember this very clearly you had a

114
00:02:30,320 –> 00:02:30,330
remember this very clearly you had a

115
00:02:30,330 –> 00:02:32,900
remember this very clearly you had a
handful of people at Arthur Andersen who

116
00:02:32,900 –> 00:02:32,910
handful of people at Arthur Andersen who

117
00:02:32,910 –> 00:02:34,730
handful of people at Arthur Andersen who
had behaved in a way that was it was not

118
00:02:34,730 –> 00:02:34,740
had behaved in a way that was it was not

119
00:02:34,740 –> 00:02:36,670
had behaved in a way that was it was not
clear whether it was illegal or not and

120
00:02:36,670 –> 00:02:36,680
clear whether it was illegal or not and

121
00:02:36,680 –> 00:02:41,540
clear whether it was illegal or not and
yet and yet Weissman made certain that

122
00:02:41,540 –> 00:02:41,550
yet and yet Weissman made certain that

123
00:02:41,550 –> 00:02:43,070
yet and yet Weissman made certain that
the jury didn’t hear the proper

124
00:02:43,070 –> 00:02:43,080
the jury didn’t hear the proper

125
00:02:43,080 –> 00:02:45,260
the jury didn’t hear the proper
instructions they were that the jury was

126
00:02:45,260 –> 00:02:45,270
instructions they were that the jury was

127
00:02:45,270 –> 00:02:48,170
instructions they were that the jury was
instead instructed that whether or not

128
00:02:48,170 –> 00:02:48,180
instead instructed that whether or not

129
00:02:48,180 –> 00:02:51,620
instead instructed that whether or not
the employees knew that there was that

130
00:02:51,620 –> 00:02:51,630
the employees knew that there was that

131
00:02:51,630 –> 00:02:53,330
the employees knew that there was that
there was actual criminal wrongdoing and

132
00:02:53,330 –> 00:02:53,340
there was actual criminal wrongdoing and

133
00:02:53,340 –> 00:02:54,050
there was actual criminal wrongdoing and
what they were doing

134
00:02:54,050 –> 00:02:54,060
what they were doing

135
00:02:54,060 –> 00:02:56,870
what they were doing
you could still indict this company well

136
00:02:56,870 –> 00:02:56,880
you could still indict this company well

137
00:02:56,880 –> 00:02:58,280
you could still indict this company well
let me tell you what happened ultimately

138
00:02:58,280 –> 00:02:58,290
let me tell you what happened ultimately

139
00:02:58,290 –> 00:03:02,000
let me tell you what happened ultimately
this was overruled unanimously by the

140
00:03:02,000 –> 00:03:02,010
this was overruled unanimously by the

141
00:03:02,010 –> 00:03:03,620
this was overruled unanimously by the
Supreme Court when does the supreme

142
00:03:03,620 –> 00:03:03,630
Supreme Court when does the supreme

143
00:03:03,630 –> 00:03:05,750
Supreme Court when does the supreme
court ever overrule the US federal

144
00:03:05,750 –> 00:03:05,760
court ever overrule the US federal

145
00:03:05,760 –> 00:03:08,479
court ever overrule the US federal
government unanimously it did and it

146
00:03:08,479 –> 00:03:08,489
government unanimously it did and it

147
00:03:08,489 –> 00:03:11,240
government unanimously it did and it
cited this particular problem and this

148
00:03:11,240 –> 00:03:11,250
cited this particular problem and this

149
00:03:11,250 –> 00:03:13,610
cited this particular problem and this
is a longtime pattern he’s a guy who

150
00:03:13,610 –> 00:03:13,620
is a longtime pattern he’s a guy who

151
00:03:13,620 –> 00:03:16,820
is a longtime pattern he’s a guy who
bends over backwards to get to get his

152
00:03:16,820 –> 00:03:16,830
bends over backwards to get to get his

153
00:03:16,830 –> 00:03:20,750
bends over backwards to get to get his
guy even when it costs the cost manna

154
00:03:20,750 –> 00:03:20,760
guy even when it costs the cost manna

155
00:03:20,760 –> 00:03:23,810
guy even when it costs the cost manna
fort his entire life basically at Arthur

156
00:03:23,810 –> 00:03:23,820
fort his entire life basically at Arthur

157
00:03:23,820 –> 00:03:25,550
fort his entire life basically at Arthur
Andersen it cost 60,000 people their

158
00:03:25,550 –> 00:03:25,560
Andersen it cost 60,000 people their

159
00:03:25,560 –> 00:03:27,799
Andersen it cost 60,000 people their
jobs

Please follow and like us:
error

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.