Corruption in the intelligence community, interview with Christopher Hull PhD

For the entire transcript of this interview, please continue reading.

1
00:00:00,000 –> 00:00:02,180
the million dollar question here Chris

2
00:00:02,180 –> 00:00:02,190
the million dollar question here Chris

3
00:00:02,190 –> 00:00:04,370
the million dollar question here Chris
is I mean especially given we talked

4
00:00:04,370 –> 00:00:04,380
is I mean especially given we talked

5
00:00:04,380 –> 00:00:06,769
is I mean especially given we talked
earlier in the show about Special

6
00:00:06,769 –> 00:00:06,779
earlier in the show about Special

7
00:00:06,779 –> 00:00:08,750
earlier in the show about Special
Counsel Robert Miller indicted Roger

8
00:00:08,750 –> 00:00:08,760
Counsel Robert Miller indicted Roger

9
00:00:08,760 –> 00:00:10,700
Counsel Robert Miller indicted Roger
stone I mean that story’s blowing up

10
00:00:10,700 –> 00:00:10,710
stone I mean that story’s blowing up

11
00:00:10,710 –> 00:00:12,350
stone I mean that story’s blowing up
again there’s no evidence these these

12
00:00:12,350 –> 00:00:12,360
again there’s no evidence these these

13
00:00:12,360 –> 00:00:14,270
again there’s no evidence these these
charges against Roger stone nothing to

14
00:00:14,270 –> 00:00:14,280
charges against Roger stone nothing to

15
00:00:14,280 –> 00:00:15,890
charges against Roger stone nothing to
do with Russia nothing to do with

16
00:00:15,890 –> 00:00:15,900
do with Russia nothing to do with

17
00:00:15,900 –> 00:00:18,529
do with Russia nothing to do with
collusion nothing of the sort but how

18
00:00:18,529 –> 00:00:18,539
collusion nothing of the sort but how

19
00:00:18,539 –> 00:00:21,050
collusion nothing of the sort but how
does news like this that the mainstream

20
00:00:21,050 –> 00:00:21,060
does news like this that the mainstream

21
00:00:21,060 –> 00:00:22,490
does news like this that the mainstream
media and the left of course are trying

22
00:00:22,490 –> 00:00:22,500
media and the left of course are trying

23
00:00:22,500 –> 00:00:24,890
media and the left of course are trying
to completely ignore they don’t factor

24
00:00:24,890 –> 00:00:24,900
to completely ignore they don’t factor

25
00:00:24,900 –> 00:00:27,500
to completely ignore they don’t factor
it into their analysis of the issue how

26
00:00:27,500 –> 00:00:27,510
it into their analysis of the issue how

27
00:00:27,510 –> 00:00:29,480
it into their analysis of the issue how
does information like this that the

28
00:00:29,480 –> 00:00:29,490
does information like this that the

29
00:00:29,490 –> 00:00:32,089
does information like this that the
dossier on which this investigation was

30
00:00:32,089 –> 00:00:32,099
dossier on which this investigation was

31
00:00:32,099 –> 00:00:36,260
dossier on which this investigation was
arguably based unverified false used as

32
00:00:36,260 –> 00:00:36,270
arguably based unverified false used as

33
00:00:36,270 –> 00:00:39,200
arguably based unverified false used as
justification in it’s unverified form to

34
00:00:39,200 –> 00:00:39,210
justification in it’s unverified form to

35
00:00:39,210 –> 00:00:42,319
justification in it’s unverified form to
spy on Trump campaign officials plus a

36
00:00:42,319 –> 00:00:42,329
spy on Trump campaign officials plus a

37
00:00:42,329 –> 00:00:45,110
spy on Trump campaign officials plus a
FISA Court judge not even having a

38
00:00:45,110 –> 00:00:45,120
FISA Court judge not even having a

39
00:00:45,120 –> 00:00:47,720
FISA Court judge not even having a
hearing but given this document to

40
00:00:47,720 –> 00:00:47,730
hearing but given this document to

41
00:00:47,730 –> 00:00:49,430
hearing but given this document to
rubber-stamp without the information he

42
00:00:49,430 –> 00:00:49,440
rubber-stamp without the information he

43
00:00:49,440 –> 00:00:51,619
rubber-stamp without the information he
or she needed to adequately be able to

44
00:00:51,619 –> 00:00:51,629
or she needed to adequately be able to

45
00:00:51,629 –> 00:00:53,209
or she needed to adequately be able to
tell if this were abuse or if this were

46
00:00:53,209 –> 00:00:53,219
tell if this were abuse or if this were

47
00:00:53,219 –> 00:00:55,549
tell if this were abuse or if this were
in line with the law what how what

48
00:00:55,549 –> 00:00:55,559
in line with the law what how what

49
00:00:55,559 –> 00:00:56,959
in line with the law what how what
impact does this have on the Moller

50
00:00:56,959 –> 00:00:56,969
impact does this have on the Moller

51
00:00:56,969 –> 00:01:00,889
impact does this have on the Moller
investigation going forward you know III

52
00:01:00,889 –> 00:01:00,899
investigation going forward you know III

53
00:01:00,899 –> 00:01:03,740
investigation going forward you know III
I tend to think that you’re right you’re

54
00:01:03,740 –> 00:01:03,750
I tend to think that you’re right you’re

55
00:01:03,750 –> 00:01:05,119
I tend to think that you’re right you’re
sort of initial sense is right I think

56
00:01:05,119 –> 00:01:05,129
sort of initial sense is right I think

57
00:01:05,129 –> 00:01:09,109
sort of initial sense is right I think
it’ll have no impact none I think that

58
00:01:09,109 –> 00:01:09,119
it’ll have no impact none I think that

59
00:01:09,119 –> 00:01:11,179
it’ll have no impact none I think that
the media is going to ignore it the

60
00:01:11,179 –> 00:01:11,189
the media is going to ignore it the

61
00:01:11,189 –> 00:01:13,039
the media is going to ignore it the
mainstream media is going to ignore it

62
00:01:13,039 –> 00:01:13,049
mainstream media is going to ignore it

63
00:01:13,049 –> 00:01:15,380
mainstream media is going to ignore it
they’re going to continue to follow the

64
00:01:15,380 –> 00:01:15,390
they’re going to continue to follow the

65
00:01:15,390 –> 00:01:17,480
they’re going to continue to follow the
the lead of the people who are

66
00:01:17,480 –> 00:01:17,490
the lead of the people who are

67
00:01:17,490 –> 00:01:20,420
the lead of the people who are
orchestrating this campaign and this is

68
00:01:20,420 –> 00:01:20,430
orchestrating this campaign and this is

69
00:01:20,430 –> 00:01:22,190
orchestrating this campaign and this is
a cover-up that’s what this is this is a

70
00:01:22,190 –> 00:01:22,200
a cover-up that’s what this is this is a

71
00:01:22,200 –> 00:01:24,980
a cover-up that’s what this is this is a
cover-up being run out of the Department

72
00:01:24,980 –> 00:01:24,990
cover-up being run out of the Department

73
00:01:24,990 –> 00:01:26,780
cover-up being run out of the Department
of Justice and I want to share some I’m

74
00:01:26,780 –> 00:01:26,790
of Justice and I want to share some I’m

75
00:01:26,790 –> 00:01:28,600
of Justice and I want to share some I’m
going to break some news for you I

76
00:01:28,600 –> 00:01:28,610
going to break some news for you I

77
00:01:28,610 –> 00:01:31,850
going to break some news for you I
performed a an analysis just this

78
00:01:31,850 –> 00:01:31,860
performed a an analysis just this

79
00:01:31,860 –> 00:01:35,870
performed a an analysis just this
morning we knew that during the 2015 16

80
00:01:35,870 –> 00:01:35,880
morning we knew that during the 2015 16

81
00:01:35,880 –> 00:01:39,020
morning we knew that during the 2015 16
election cycle 90% of the political

82
00:01:39,020 –> 00:01:39,030
election cycle 90% of the political

83
00:01:39,030 –> 00:01:40,550
election cycle 90% of the political
contributions from Justice Department

84
00:01:40,550 –> 00:01:40,560
contributions from Justice Department

85
00:01:40,560 –> 00:01:43,370
contributions from Justice Department
employees these political contributions

86
00:01:43,370 –> 00:01:43,380
employees these political contributions

87
00:01:43,380 –> 00:01:45,620
employees these political contributions
went to Democrats that was known and so

88
00:01:45,620 –> 00:01:45,630
went to Democrats that was known and so

89
00:01:45,630 –> 00:01:48,100
went to Democrats that was known and so
this is so is an overwhelmingly partisan

90
00:01:48,100 –> 00:01:48,110
this is so is an overwhelmingly partisan

91
00:01:48,110 –> 00:01:50,300
this is so is an overwhelmingly partisan
supposedly non partisan staff well

92
00:01:50,300 –> 00:01:50,310
supposedly non partisan staff well

93
00:01:50,310 –> 00:01:51,950
supposedly non partisan staff well
that’s in the Obama administration so I

94
00:01:51,950 –> 00:01:51,960
that’s in the Obama administration so I

95
00:01:51,960 –> 00:01:53,920
that’s in the Obama administration so I
actually crunched the numbers myself

96
00:01:53,920 –> 00:01:53,930
actually crunched the numbers myself

97
00:01:53,930 –> 00:01:55,760
actually crunched the numbers myself
before I came on

98
00:01:55,760 –> 00:01:55,770
before I came on

99
00:01:55,770 –> 00:01:57,920
before I came on
turns out three hundred and thirty seven

100
00:01:57,920 –> 00:01:57,930
turns out three hundred and thirty seven

101
00:01:57,930 –> 00:02:00,709
turns out three hundred and thirty seven
thousand dollars came out of first our

102
00:02:00,709 –> 00:02:00,719
thousand dollars came out of first our

103
00:02:00,719 –> 00:02:02,840
thousand dollars came out of first our
taxpayer money to Department of Justice

104
00:02:02,840 –> 00:02:02,850
taxpayer money to Department of Justice

105
00:02:02,850 –> 00:02:04,580
taxpayer money to Department of Justice
officials then into the coffers of the

106
00:02:04,580 –> 00:02:04,590
officials then into the coffers of the

107
00:02:04,590 –> 00:02:07,660
officials then into the coffers of the
Democrats that figure dropped from 90%

108
00:02:07,660 –> 00:02:07,670
Democrats that figure dropped from 90%

109
00:02:07,670 –> 00:02:11,960
Democrats that figure dropped from 90%
in the Obama administration to 84

110
00:02:11,960 –> 00:02:11,970
in the Obama administration to 84

111
00:02:11,970 –> 00:02:14,000
in the Obama administration to 84
percent in the Trump administration

112
00:02:14,000 –> 00:02:14,010
percent in the Trump administration

113
00:02:14,010 –> 00:02:17,000
percent in the Trump administration
so in the 2018 election cycle that just

114
00:02:17,000 –> 00:02:17,010
so in the 2018 election cycle that just

115
00:02:17,010 –> 00:02:21,020
so in the 2018 election cycle that just
ended it turns out that 84% of political

116
00:02:21,020 –> 00:02:21,030
ended it turns out that 84% of political

117
00:02:21,030 –> 00:02:22,160
ended it turns out that 84% of political
contributions coming out of that

118
00:02:22,160 –> 00:02:22,170
contributions coming out of that

119
00:02:22,170 –> 00:02:25,449
contributions coming out of that
building went to Democrats this is a

120
00:02:25,449 –> 00:02:25,459
building went to Democrats this is a

121
00:02:25,459 –> 00:02:29,509
building went to Democrats this is a
partisan prosecution and that’s one more

122
00:02:29,509 –> 00:02:29,519
partisan prosecution and that’s one more

123
00:02:29,519 –> 00:02:31,369
partisan prosecution and that’s one more
data point to prove it it is and that’s

124
00:02:31,369 –> 00:02:31,379
data point to prove it it is and that’s

125
00:02:31,379 –> 00:02:33,140
data point to prove it it is and that’s
it’s absolutely shocking absolutely

126
00:02:33,140 –> 00:02:33,150
it’s absolutely shocking absolutely

127
00:02:33,150 –> 00:02:35,059
it’s absolutely shocking absolutely
shocking want to see more videos like

128
00:02:35,059 –> 00:02:35,069
shocking want to see more videos like

129
00:02:35,069 –> 00:02:36,979
shocking want to see more videos like
this click on the link below and

130
00:02:36,979 –> 00:02:36,989
this click on the link below and

131
00:02:36,989 –> 00:02:38,930
this click on the link below and
subscribe to one American news on

132
00:02:38,930 –> 00:02:38,940
subscribe to one American news on

133
00:02:38,940 –> 00:02:41,210
subscribe to one American news on
YouTube and call your cable provider and

134
00:02:41,210 –> 00:02:41,220
YouTube and call your cable provider and

135
00:02:41,220 –> 00:02:43,339
YouTube and call your cable provider and
kindly demand that what American news is

136
00:02:43,339 –> 00:02:43,349
kindly demand that what American news is

137
00:02:43,349 –> 00:02:45,619
kindly demand that what American news is
added to your lineup call and subscribe

138
00:02:45,619 –> 00:02:45,629
added to your lineup call and subscribe

139
00:02:45,629 –> 00:02:48,019
added to your lineup call and subscribe
today

 

Please follow and like us:
error

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.