November 22, 2019

Brad Johnson on why impeachment hearings are really taking place

 

 
brad johnson today is the third and you
00:03
tell me this is the final day of the
00:05
impeachment hearings i guess that’s good
00:06
news i mean it’s gonna be rough on the
00:09
National Enquirer I suppose please like
00:13
give us some sanity on this yeah today’s
00:16
is the last day that has been scheduled
00:19
the Republicans did make a request to
00:21
have a minority hearing day where they
00:24
could schedule the witnesses that the
00:26
Adam Schiff as head of the Democrat
00:28
majority on the committee has refused to
00:31
allow them to bring in so it’s
00:33
conceivable there would be another day
00:35
but I would say you know 99.9% Adam
00:38
Schiff would never allow such a thing
00:40
because it’s to too many other witnesses
00:42
will come out to contradict what what
00:44
little they have had to present during
00:47
the during the three days of hearings
00:48
that we’ve just are now completing today
00:50
I would say a real interest out of all
00:53
of these things would be Adam shifts
00:56
opening statement and if you kind of go
00:58
back and look at his opening statement
00:59
which kind of droned on for up I don’t
01:01
know good ten minutes almost I’d seem
01:05
like to me maybe five minutes but you
01:07
know one of the things he said over and
01:09
over and over and over is conspiracy
01:11
theory conspiracy theory and what he was
01:14
referring to was Ukraine having been
01:17
involved in meddling in US politics
01:20
essentially targeting the Republican
01:22
Party and targeting the then candidate
01:25
president Trump and newly elected
01:26
president Trump now but the number of
01:29
things about all of this that are
01:31
starting to come out that really look
01:33
pretty bad out of all of this is there’s
01:37
a lot of evidence to support that now
01:38
the FBI has also just opened an
01:41
investigation against this Eric
01:43
charmella who is the whistleblower that
01:45
the only people that are refusing to say
01:48
his name it’s come out on almost
01:50
everywhere except mainstream media the
01:53
liberal mainstream media and Congress
01:57
and other than that it really hasn’t
02:00
been you know or I should say only
02:02
within those limits has not been
02:04
mentioned and other than that every
02:05
place else is the name is widely out
02:08
there and referred to now the FBI is
02:10
open an investigation of him well
02:13
because they know he’s the whistleblower
02:15
so I mean it’s kind of the cat is out of
02:17
the bag as this goes forward and the
02:19
investigation continues it is going to
02:21
eventually force the hand of the
02:23
mainstream media the liberal mainstream
02:25
media to start to talk about him in the
02:27
case and there’s only so much they can
02:29
do to cover up for this for so long but
02:31
why is all of that happening and again I
02:33
always say you know take a step back and
02:36
just look how does rather than getting
02:38
caught up in too many of the details how
02:39
why and how would all of this be going
02:41
forward the way it is and this thing
02:44
about the conspiracy theory that Adam
02:47
Schiff was pushing so hard I I didn’t
02:50
you know I should have counted if I
02:52
didn’t know he was going to say it over
02:53
and over during that statement but he
02:54
must have said conspiracy fair Theory 15
02:57
or 20 times so you know this is this was
03:00
the goal for him today was to damage
03:03
that aspect of what’s going on and so
03:05
you know I think we can kind of fairly
03:07
conclude that and in the face of a
03:10
number of bits of evidence that have
03:12
come up that a lot of this did indeed
03:14
take place and that there was some
03:16
coordination with the former government
03:18
in Ukraine now that former government
03:20
was left-leaning
03:21
in agreement with you know the same
03:24
philosophical perspective as what we saw
03:27
under the previous Obama administration
03:29
and all of these the people that are
03:31
here today being active and testifying
03:34
and so on all of these people are
03:36
left-leaning
03:36
State Department is probably the most
03:38
left-leaning agency of the United States
03:40
in the federal government and have long
03:43
been known for that since basically
03:45
after World War Two they became this
03:46
left-leaning bureaucracy and have stayed
03:48
that way ever since and become stronger
03:50
and stronger in that now all of those
03:56
things being true and mr. chair amela
03:58
was coordinating with Adam Schiff and
04:00
two of the people on Adams shift staff
04:02
were also previously worked with
04:05
chairman so they’re close friends and
04:07
have known each other for years and so
04:09
there there was very easy for this
04:11
coordination to take place so if all of
04:13
this is true what is which has being
04:16
investigated but if all of this is true
04:18
then this seems to be a fairly clear act
04:22
of sedition and conspiracy to commit
04:26
which is in fact a specific law under
04:29
the statutes and it is a felony and in
04:33
this particular case if Adam Schiff was
04:35
involved in all of this stuff it would
04:37
appear that he’s taking some risk and
04:40
out on a limb for conspiracy to commit
04:42
sedition so I would say and that’s a
04:47
20-year penalty up to 20-year penalty in
04:49
federal law felony so you know this this
04:53
is starting to get a little odd and
04:55
strange and as these investigations are
04:56
coming out I think these guys have taken
04:58
a risk on this and are really with for
05:02
no reason whatsoever nothing apparent
05:04
coordinating all of this in advance
05:06
including with Ukraine went with a
05:08
friendly government in Ukraine are are
05:10
have been targeting president Trump all
05:12
along which attempting to unseat a
05:17
legally elected president of the United
05:19
States for political reasons does come
05:23
awfully close to a definition of
05:25
sedition I was reading through those
05:27
definitions this morning earlier just
05:28
taking a look so I I think that this is
05:31
taking a very very ugly turn and I I
05:34
don’t like what I see and certainly if
05:36
they’re guilty of it then they need to
05:38
be punished to the full extent of the
05:39
law and there seems to be a lot of
05:42
people there and and just now human
05:44
nature kind of with my background it’s
05:46
one of the elements of this I look at
05:47
people who’ve been in power and and and
05:51
seek power or it tends to go to their
05:54
head and there’s an old saying absolute
05:56
power corrupts absolutely and I’m afraid
05:58
that this is what what we’ve seen happen
06:00
since the Democratic Party lost power
06:03
their desperation to gain it back has
06:06
led them down a path that looks very
06:08
dangerous and certainly everything we’re
06:10
seeing out of the FISA warrant the steel
06:14
dossier being used to justify this which
06:16
was a politically driven document all of
06:18
these things make them look very very
06:21
very guilty certainly extraordinarily
06:23
suspicious circumstances at the very
06:25
least so all this needs to be uncovered
06:28
I just I I hope and pray that that US
06:32
Attorney General bar is going to be able
06:33
to track all this down and the FBI will
06:35
indeed do an honest investigation of
06:40
Aric charmella who was the whistleblower
06:42
and his background having been you know
06:45
we’ve talked about it before but having
06:46
come out of the CIA being kind of picked
06:50
off the street as a demonstrator made an
06:52
analyst all by John Brennan hand-picked
06:55
to go on this task force that fusion
06:58
task force that John Brennan put
07:00
together to work this Russian case which
07:03
of course we all know was based on the
07:06
political documents no facts and then
07:09
used to create a FISA document and now
07:12
this guy reappears well why would he be
07:14
willing to take such risk and I think
07:16
it’s because he knew he was already
07:18
facing roots so I think charmella is a
07:20
real weakness in this this thing that
07:24
the Democrats are trying to do so if if
07:28
the FBI does investigate does uncover
07:30
start to look at his background and put
07:32
all of this together I think this might
07:35
be a dagger at the heart of the
07:36
Democrats I think this is going to
07:38
backfire them in a way that will cause
07:40
people to go to jail and some of these
07:43
things that they’re doing and it looks
07:45
like in coordinating with some of the
07:47
left-leaning Brits and Italians and
07:49
Russians and in Ukraine I mean that’s an
07:54
international conspiracy if if all of
07:56
that is true that does indeed approach
08:00
the what would be defined as treason and
08:04
if they’re guilty of treason again this
08:06
is something we’ve talked about before
08:07
but there is a death penalty for treason
08:09
and as I’ve said all along if it does
08:12
indeed pan out that way this is
08:15
something that needs to be implemented
08:16
if we’ve had people get this drunk with
08:19
you know their thirst for power that has
08:22
to be nipped in the bud that has to be
08:24
stopped we cannot allow that sort of
08:26
behavior to go to go forward here in the
08:28
United States of America and the further
08:30
and further we dig into this the worse
08:32
and worse it looks so if I could jump in
08:35
a second this is something I don’t
08:36
understand I think there’s four first
08:39
tier Democrats that have children that
08:40
were making giant but undeserved
08:43
salaries at on the board of Ukrainian
08:45
energy companies so I don’t understand
08:47
why the Democrats initiated a procedure
08:49
in which it was likely that this would
08:52
be exposed
08:53
what they were talking about the case
08:55
for Trump wrongdoings connected to the
08:59
Ukraine was a fiction yet and below the
09:01
surface of that fiction lies
09:03
extraordinary acts of of corruption and
09:06
every conceivable sense of the term I
09:08
just don’t get why they would take that
09:10
risk unless they figured that the
09:13
cost-benefit of that risk was so great
09:15
because they’re already their
09:16
pre-existing crimes if they go
09:19
discovered I mean what’s that
09:22
what is the logic here I think that’s
09:25
precisely it it’s the previously
09:27
existing crimes that took place and if
09:30
again this is an area you know I’ve
09:32
spent some time discussing but if you
09:35
look at just what we know kind of the
09:37
facts what they fit and I like to refer
09:39
to Occam’s razor you know taking the
09:41
simplest explanation that fits all the
09:43
facts and what that is right now is that
09:47
Hillary Clinton had that breach of all
09:52
this classified information I think
09:54
indeed you know Hillary I think it’s
09:55
very unsophisticated about you know
09:58
email and Internet and security and all
10:01
those things I don’t think she cares
10:02
about any of those things so I think it
10:05
is in fact true what she has said about
10:08
these classified documents that she just
10:11
had her staff cut him and sent him so
10:12
she could get him on her blackberry so
10:15
that she could just read all the
10:16
classified documents all the time
10:17
whenever she wanted and there’s
10:18
thousands of pictures that are out there
10:20
clicking around on that old Blackberry
10:21
thing and getting her email that way and
10:25
those email were all these classified
10:27
documents so and as we’ve talked about
10:29
in great detail I mean we’re talking
10:30
about tens of thousands of classified
10:32
documents so it was something that was
10:34
how she did business when all of that
10:36
escaped and was taken by others I mean
10:38
certainly it appears the Chinese and
10:40
Russians both have access to this and it
10:42
went out everywhere and as I’ve talked
10:45
about you know what damage was done by
10:47
all that if you follow well that took
10:49
place that way so I think that is
10:52
correct that that underlying problem
10:54
stems from those leaked classified
10:58
documents that came out of the Hillary
11:00
Clinton State Department years and you
11:02
remember from from what the FBI
11:04
reporting has been on this we’re talking
11:06
about tens of
11:07
thousands of documents and the damage
11:09
that was done by that has never really
11:11
been investigated so he can’t speak
11:13
authoritative ly about what was done so
11:15
we can only talk about the potential so
11:17
the potential of maybe 60 or 70 thousand
11:21
classified documents being out there and
11:23
we know for a fact based on the James
11:26
Comey July of 2016 speech that there
11:30
were CIA documents included in that so a
11:32
lot of people were getting killed right
11:34
right after that period as as if you
11:37
know those what what is possible that
11:40
those documents then were hacked out of
11:42
this computer that was at Hillary
11:44
Clinton’s in her closet and was
11:47
unprotected against that level of attack
11:49
against state level attack and all of
11:51
those were captured so I mean it’s not
11:53
reasonable to assume that your home
11:55
computer cannot be hacked by China and
11:58
Russia when they’ve got that that level
12:01
of sophistication to do these attacks so
12:03
we can just naturally assume all of
12:05
those things got out and then a lot of
12:08
these people coincidentally just end up
12:09
dead so a lot of operations were
12:12
discovered some excuses got leaked out
12:14
of the CIA which that by itself I find
12:16
very odd and what they were saying is oh
12:19
it was a communications program that we
12:21
used in the Middle East where there’s
12:23
less sophistication being used against
12:26
us and then we just moved it over here
12:28
and we’re using it in these Chinese
12:29
operations and the Chinese figured it
12:31
out that whole thing is stupid and that
12:33
makes no sense whatsoever if it’s true a
12:35
lot of people should have been fired for
12:37
that because that was stupid nobody
12:38
would have ever made decisions like that
12:40
in the old days so I mean there’s
12:42
they’re just everything that can be
12:43
wrong with that story is wrong so it
12:45
makes no sense so you if that is in case
12:49
the case and if those things are only
12:51
doubt and if that got a lot of people
12:53
killed then which is what it looks like
12:56
then Hillary Clinton had a very serious
12:59
problem
13:00
very serious criminal problem and I
13:03
think out of that we saw the steel
13:05
dossier she turned to John Brennan at
13:07
the CIA to help her work her way back
13:10
out of this she turned you know she’s
13:11
gotten herself in an intelligence
13:12
problem and turned to the intelligence
13:14
people to get out of it and you see this
13:16
coordination taking place behind the
13:18
scenes with
13:19
the steel dossier the FBI the Italians
13:22
the Brits in Ukraine and all of these
13:25
things going on in the background so
13:28
these people that got all involved in
13:30
that they all thought everybody thought
13:33
that Hillary Clinton was going to be the
13:36
next president in United States and they
13:37
were dedicated loyalists to that same
13:39
leftist philosophy that Hillary Clinton
13:41
was so they would not have looked at
13:43
this with any moral objections they
13:45
would have looked at it as a you know as
13:47
a positive from their moral perspective
13:49
on the extreme left which is kind of a
13:52
warped sense of morality just to begin
13:54
with but that would have been their
13:55
perspective so they would have looked at
13:57
this as a great thing we’ve got a you
13:59
know helped Hillary get out of this
14:00
problem we’ll cover up what’s done is
14:02
done
14:02
she did it for expediency not trying to
14:04
make problems so you know we’re gonna
14:06
jump in and we’re gonna get those nasty
14:08
Republicans anyway we’ve all seen over
14:10
and over and over that the Democratic
14:12
Party talks about the Republican Party
14:14
being a greater threat than in terrorism
14:16
if that is their view there’s been
14:18
dozens of Democrats say precisely that
14:21
so from that context from that kind of
14:24
twisted worldview this all makes sense
14:27
so they would have gone forward with
14:28
doing that and when Hillary Clinton lost
14:30
you know you know oMG you know that that
14:33
means a world of hurt is coming forward
14:36
because of these details come out
14:38
they’re all going to jail I mean
14:40
seriously I mean there’s treason and
14:43
Sedition and all sorts of problems in
14:45
that and what seems to be bubbling to
14:47
the surface now and and we’ve certainly
14:48
seen comments from US Attorney General
14:51
Barr that fit that scenario that he’s
14:54
starting to dig in and look at all this
14:56
stuff and it’s going holy cow I mean
14:58
this is out of control so III think
15:01
that’s what really fits that this was an
15:03
underlying problem caused by Hillary
15:06
Clinton at State Department from there
15:08
she tried to fix it by targeting whoever
15:09
the Republican was going to be because
15:11
remember the steel dossier began before
15:14
Trump won the nomination to run for
15:17
president then after he won the
15:19
nomination they were able to focus in
15:21
and target him prior to the election
15:24
still thinking Hillary Clinton was going
15:26
to win Hillary loses Trump becomes
15:28
president and then it became desperate
15:30
and what we have seen is just desperate
15:32
act
15:33
desperate act after desperate act the
15:35
molar report we’ve seen former director
15:38
CIA director John Brennan go on MSNBC
15:40
and NPR all of these and it’s just vegan
15:43
hatred for Trump that hatred doesn’t
15:46
come from nothing and I think what it
15:48
comes from is fear I think that’s
15:51
actually what’s going on I think he’s
15:53
afraid John Brennan’s afraid of all of
15:55
this coming to the to light so I I see
15:58
that’s what’s unfolding and now they’ve
16:00
placed their hopes and Adam Schiff who
16:03
is just talking this is a conspiracy
16:05
theory and this is nonsense
16:07
and they’re able to find bits and pieces
16:08
of things that they can string together
16:10
that makes it look like at least you
16:13
know on an uninformed basis it makes it
16:16
look like Trump is guilty of something
16:18
but the transcript is out there
16:20
everybody that’s testified you know they
16:22
come up with little bits of the things
16:23
like oh yeah there was quid pro quo but
16:25
it wasn’t the quid pro quo that that
16:28
Adam Schiff is saying it is so they just
16:30
stringed again together things that
16:32
don’t necessarily make sense as as a
16:35
whole they just though they’re these
16:37
independent little facts think you say
16:39
AHA there’s quid pro quo even though it
16:40
had nothing to do with all the stuff
16:42
we’re saying so I think that’s what
16:44
we’re seeing but again an act of
16:46
desperation and coverup I think
16:48
essentially what we’re seeing is an
16:50
attempt to cover the real underlying
16:53
problems of all this and I think this is
16:56
this really truly is is a dagger at the
16:58
heart of the Democratic Party they all
17:00
most of them in positions of authority
17:02
see it and are desperate and I think
17:05
that’s what we’re seeing play out
17:06
now the other shoot has not dropped now
17:08
a lot of people are desperate waiting
17:11
for this you know for pushback on all of
17:14
this but I’ve said this before the
17:16
numbers are not going against Trump on
17:18
this the numbers are going for Trump and
17:21
he hasn’t even answered really on these
17:22
things yet so I think once the other
17:26
side begins firing salvos if I can talk
17:29
about it that way
17:31
it’s just unending salvos from the
17:33
Democrats and I think they’re winding
17:34
down because they’re running out of
17:35
stuff and Trump hasn’t really even begun
17:39
I mean if you want the other side of the
17:41
story
17:41
nobody’s really pushing it out there yet
17:43
it’s all still being investigated and
17:45
coming although
17:46
the IG report apparently is in the very
17:48
final stages and they’re reviewing it
17:50
with the people mentioned in the IG
17:51
report who have the right to then
17:53
respond in writing as you know to their
17:55
thoughts as to what was said about them
17:56
so that’s that’s the very final stage
17:59
before a report becomes public so I
18:01
think that’s going to be the first salvo
18:03
again using that same metaphor that
18:05
we’ll we’ll see coming out of the Trump
18:07
side of this equation and I think once
18:10
that happens I think there’s going to be
18:12
indictments recommended out of the IG
18:15
report which is the maximum you can hope
18:17
for out of that and then on the heels of
18:19
that will see that John the US Attorney
18:20
John Durham report come out of this and
18:24
his investigation and whatever
18:25
indictments come out of that the Atlanta
18:28
Commission the FBI is also now
18:30
investigating this Eric charmella so you
18:32
start you know just taking all this as a
18:34
whole and it’s spurious what they’re
18:39
trying to do to Donald Trump it’s just
18:42
kind of ridiculous and yet under this
18:45
what’s coming out are real things with
18:48
very serious felony penalties involved
18:50
with some of these things so I think
18:53
this whole thing is gonna the dam is
18:55
going to break apart I think a lot of
18:56
these people are going to go to jail I
18:58
think that anybody running on the
19:00
Republican ticket he’s going to have a
19:03
chance at a clean sweep III think 2020
19:07
elections are going to be a disaster as
19:10
all this stuff floats to the surface I
19:12
think Trump’s numbers are going to take
19:14
a double-digit jump very soon I wouldn’t
19:17
be surprised to see him in the long run
19:19
I mean things can change but I wouldn’t
19:21
be surprised to see him get a 40 state
19:23
win out of the next presidential
19:25
election so let’s just hope that’s the
19:27
way it turns out you know just going to
19:30
character for a moment I read an article
19:32
recently I don’t know how recently was
19:35
written but I read it recently which was
19:37
by the fellow who fired Hillary Clinton
19:39
from the Watergate hearings and he said
19:42
he felt it was time that people knew
19:45
what kind of a character they were
19:47
dealing with he listed his reasons for
19:49
letting her go
19:50
not gonna I’m not gonna state them here
19:52
because I’ve run in the article in front
19:54
of me
19:55
but anybody who’s really interested in
19:57
knowing whether or not Hillary Clinton
20:00
is capable of the things you’re
20:02
describing really should go back and
20:04
look at her behavior um in the Watergate
20:07
Commission see what she did to Nixon and
20:11
to the American public and why and who
20:14
benefited was quite an extraordinary
20:17
laundry list of sociopathic actions
20:22
which had nothing to do with
20:23
establishing truth or improving the
20:26
quality of American government and once
20:28
you’ve read that and everything that
20:30
you’re describing that could be
20:31
attributed to her are perfectly
20:34
consistent with that character I agree
20:38
with that assessment III think that that
20:40
is consistent and I as I sometimes make
20:43
the point you know for the word morality
20:45
we can’t have three definitions immoral
20:47
moral and immoral and she’s one of those
20:50
people that strikes me is fully immoral
20:52
just their morality isn’t taken into
20:56
calculation in her world which is that
20:58
sort of sociopathic attitude if you will
21:01
and I I think that fits her you know as
21:06
all this unfolds and we’ll see what
21:08
happens I I know she’s got some health
21:11
problems too so I would I just don’t
21:14
know what’s going to happen on that
21:15
score as they dig back and if it gets
21:16
traced back to the origins of all this
21:18
to her how she’ll be treated but I think
21:22
like I said I think in the origin of
21:25
this is all Hillary Clinton and if you
21:27
look at as you’re saying as this has
21:30
unfolded and the path that was chosen as
21:32
a result of being faced with a certain
21:34
type of problem it’s consistent with
21:37
what we’ve seen out of Hillary Clinton
21:39
you know she’s not the you know it’s not
21:42
her in her nature to take these things
21:44
head-on it’s in her nature and it’s sort
21:46
of like try to do something about it
21:48
behind the scenes and cover and create
21:49
cover for action if you will on what she
21:51
does and what she wants to do so that’s
21:53
that just a completely amoral attitude
21:56
very kind of sociopathic attitude that
21:59
that I think he’s consistent throughout
22:01
her public career
22:07
[Music]
22:14
[Music]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial