Interview Brad Johnson on the shooting death of Phil Haney 4 months ago Brad Johnson and Brad Johnson this is February the 00:02 22nd of 2020 and a tragic event happened 00:08 last night a person I did not know but 00:11 from all I have seen was was both a 00:13 tremendously important individual in 00:16 terms of his exposing some of the darker 00:19 forces at work in our Western states as 00:22 well as just being a terrifically nice 00:24 guy was murdered the best information I 00:27 have is somewhere outside his car 00:29 somewhere in his home state Phil Haney I 00:33 believe he was a Department of Homeland 00:35 Security whistleblower correct 00:37 particularly focused on what the Obama 00:40 administration appeared to be doing that 00:42 were certainly against the interests of 00:43 a constitutional America and I think you 00:47 have some other data points that while 00:50 may not be conclusive would be what 00:52 science might call indicative toward a 00:54 pattern why don’t you just take it from 00:56 there all right very good so Philip a 00:59 knee first as you correctly pointed out 01:01 is DHS Department Homeland Security he 01:03 was one of the guys that went in and 01:04 very early into DHS so he was kind of 01:07 end of the you know the founding member 01:09 crew he was part of that back group of 01:12 people from the very beginning got out 01:14 it was the older man now in his later 01:16 70s I believe now and he was found dead 01:18 shot the very few details on the actual 01:21 death but it appears to be murder he was 01:24 apparently shot in the chest 01:26 some reports are saying in the back well 01:28 we’ll see but different different 01:30 reports have come out with conflicting 01:32 information on the details 01:33 overall they all agree that he was shot 01:36 and what people are all saying is murder 01:38 now don’t know yet that all has to be 01:40 confirmed we’ll have to see but those 01:41 are what the early reports are 01:43 indicating now Philip Nene himself was 01:46 one of the very first actual true live 01:49 honest-to-god whistleblowers that was 01:50 out there reporting on corruption the 01:54 corruption that was he was reporting on 01:55 if everyone thinks back to the Obama 01:58 administration one of the things that 01:59 they were pushing is kind of backing off 02:02 on counterterrorism issues so they were 02:04 trying to you know show I have always 02:08 described it as sort of a two-pronged 02:09 strategy where one they took the 02:11 pressure off terrorism which they 02:13 absolutely 02:13 did all of terrorist groups and to then 02:16 said oh you know we’re all friends their 02:18 expectation at the time was that you 02:20 know they’re they’re taking the pressure 02:22 off terrorist groups and reach out the 02:23 olive branch and they expected that 02:25 terrorists would look out and say oh 02:26 okay well the Americans don’t really 02:28 mean it introduced any harm 02:29 you know just ordinarily naive but I 02:32 guess that was what they were after and 02:34 and the reasoning behind this this kind 02:37 of two-pronged strategy 02:38 so part of what they were doing in the 02:40 background was removing all of this 02:41 information about terrorists and 02:43 terrorist groups now there are those 02:44 that theorized that there was a more 02:46 malicious intent behind this going on 02:48 and philip touched on some of those 02:50 aspects of it that because this is so 02:52 purposeful that it was done 02:55 intentionally – you know it made life 02:57 much much easier for terrorist groups so 02:59 I’ll put it that way and once that 03:01 information is gone it’s very difficult 03:02 to get it back because you have a body 03:04 of things that you collect over time and 03:05 if it’s all just taken away then to 03:07 recreate it all of that body of 03:09 knowledge –is is difficult because it 03:10 wasn’t one monolithic thing that you got 03:13 it was bits and pieces that that fit 03:15 together and give you a picture of 03:16 what’s going on in these terrorist 03:17 groups so a lot of that was being erased 03:19 out of DHS which let me say that was not 03:23 something that took place only in DHS 03:25 that was the intelligence community wide 03:27 which is one of the reasons why I always 03:30 talk about these issues because what 03:32 happens if it the CIA and NSA and DHS 03:35 and DNI at all of these places you see 03:38 this information sort of get you know 03:40 deleted and erased and you’re starting 03:42 over without all of it and all of these 03:44 people look at it is great and grand and 03:46 wonderful you know you got to look at 03:47 that go why and it’s one of the reasons 03:49 why the intelligence information that’s 03:51 going up to the president United States 03:53 and the White House and my opinion is is 03:56 tends to be just poor I’ll put it that 04:00 way it just doesn’t tend to be very good 04:01 it certainly doesn’t hold up to the 04:03 standards of what could be done what 04:05 should be done what used to be done 04:06 those sorts of things so this 04:09 degradation in capability is one of the 04:11 my pet peeves one of the things I really 04:13 argue vehemently to point out to people 04:15 to try and rebuild I will add one more 04:17 comment on that the same people at the 04:20 CIA that were in charge under Obama with 04:23 the exception of John Brennan who’s now 04:25 was was fired are all still there the 04:28 the director of the CIA was a close 04:30 friend and Lieutenant of John Brennan 04:34 and all of the people in leadership 04:36 they’re all the same so these policies 04:38 haven’t been turned around yet and it’s 04:39 something that President Trump I think 04:41 he’s just now beginning to understand 04:43 it’s just how deep this goes and the 04:44 problems that are there now Philip Haney 04:46 let’s you know there’s some assumptions 04:48 here there as I said the initial 04:49 information is that he was murdered and 04:51 one of the things as you mentioned I I 04:53 look at this and and I always say you 04:56 know I don’t really like coincidences 04:57 it’s the background to it and training 04:59 and experience but I just don’t like 05:00 coincidences and we we start to see some 05:03 stuff I want to mention a couple of 05:04 different cases some of which are 05:06 publicly known and some of which are not 05:08 but one of the ones that was publicly 05:10 known as death rich pretty famous case a 05:12 lot of reporting on it Seth rich was at 05:14 a bar at night coming home was a block 05:16 away from his house got shot twice in 05:18 the back ambulance got there and he died 05:21 like an hour and a half later now there 05:24 were some lot of initial reporting about 05:25 this because you know he wasn’t robbed 05:27 but the claim is that it was an 05:29 attempted robbery and apparently there 05:32 were some bruises on him and some 05:33 fisticuffs going on and and so they 05:35 they’re claiming based on that that it 05:37 was a robbery Seth Rich’s families is 05:39 this and they’ve got a lot of if you 05:41 look down the list of who supports it 05:43 they’re all liberal organizations saying 05:44 oh yeah this is Seth Richie was an 05:46 attempted robbery and that’s it anyone 05:48 who says anything difference lying but 05:50 there’s there’s a couple of things to it 05:52 now there was initially an investigator 05:54 or police investigator that came out and 05:56 took a look at it and he was drawing 05:58 some links between Seth rich and 06:00 WikiLeaks and saying that Seth rich 06:02 might have been the source of the leaks 06:04 now the family was saying that this is 06:05 nut job stuff it’s absolutely crazy and 06:08 as I said that list of people you know 06:10 it’s thing the New York Times in the 06:12 Washington Post and people like that are 06:14 all saying it’s nonsense so I mean you 06:16 know them saying that I personally don’t 06:19 consider that very significant or 06:21 important because what else are they 06:22 going to say I mean if it’s true they’ll 06:24 say it’s you know that it was just a 06:26 robbery that’s what they’ll say if it’s 06:27 not true that it was more than a robbery 06:29 they’ll still say that’s all it was so 06:31 now the family of course was very upset 06:33 by this that I understand perfectly 06:35 they’ve sued a number of people that 06:36 talked about it but 06:37 here’s the issue at least it’s what’s 06:40 come out now 06:40 there was this link to WikiLeaks that 06:44 was initially uncovered by the 06:46 investigations but then said to be 06:48 insignificant and it goes back to the 06:51 Russia leak that all this stuff was 06:53 hacked by Russia and that that’s where 06:55 all of those wiki leak documents came 06:57 from was the Russians so could I just 07:00 hide it can I just cut and dad two quick 07:01 points though yes in fact a song is 07:04 categorically stated actually three 07:06 points categorically stated all of his 07:09 material was leaked so none of it was 07:11 hacks and to that he did offer a large 07:15 reward for whoever killed Seth rich and 07:19 while you stopped short of saying that 07:21 Southridge was his source on these on 07:23 these DNC leaks he did say that he felt 07:25 it was when he was asked why he was 07:27 posting this unprecedented reward he 07:29 said we have to protect our sources 07:31 well you’ve you’ve hit on precisely 07:34 where I was headed with this I mean the 07:36 the the the take home fact out of that 07:38 is is what you’re saying there it was 07:40 was like I said that was exactly where I 07:42 was headed that the the the one thing 07:45 that makes you question this is Julian 07:46 Assange making a number of different 07:48 comments not all in a row but at 07:50 different times and offering the reward 07:52 later upping the reward to I think a 07:54 hundred and twenty five thousand and yet 07:57 denying that that that this guy was the 08:01 source but yet then going on and saying 08:02 well we have to protect our sources and 08:04 that’s why I’m giving the reward so a 08:06 lot of conflicting information out of 08:07 that but all indicators are that that 08:10 based on what Julian Assange is saying 08:11 is that he was indeed Etheridge was 08:15 indeed based on on the Santas comments 08:18 that what he was indeed the source of 08:20 these these leaked documents that 08:22 WikiLeaks had I don’t know I don’t think 08:24 we’ll ever find out I think the salient 08:27 point important point I wanted to make 08:28 out of it is that based on what its aunt 08:30 is saying Assange well while denying it 08:32 still sort of semi confirmed that Seth 08:35 rich was the source so we may never know 08:38 on that end of it but if that is true if 08:41 it were to turn out to be true if we 08:43 ever learned that if Assange 08:44 ever admits to it or WikiLeaks ever 08:46 confirms it something along those lines 08:48 then you know you have to pretty 08:50 to conclude that this was a politically 08:52 motivated murder now again the 08:54 Philippine II is kind of in the same 08:55 boat we just don’t know but it’s 08:57 certainly the type of guy that there 09:00 would be there would be political motive 09:01 to murder whether he was murdered 09:04 whether these two individuals were 09:05 murdered or not we don’t know now let me 09:07 get on to some of the things I wanted to 09:09 mention that are kind of not in the 09:10 public realm and one of them on just I 09:13 can say personal story out of all of 09:16 this and then then one other from a 09:17 contact of mine now in in in my case I 09:22 was one of the individuals being a 09:23 federal employee having been a for 09:25 federal employee the Office of Personnel 09:28 Management got hacked by China and all 09:31 that’s been widely reported so all of 09:33 the personnel records were in that 09:35 information that was hacked by China so 09:37 phone number addresses Social Security 09:40 everything they have everything the 09:42 information that you have to provide to 09:43 the federal government in order to be 09:45 employed there as extensive I mean it 09:47 has information about your parents and 09:49 grandparents and just everything that’s 09:50 in there your schools everything so all 09:53 of that was hacked out of China now in 09:54 my particular case that information 09:57 somehow was provided through from China 10:01 their point of origin on the information 10:03 was China ended up here in the United 10:05 States to certain group them calling me 10:08 and began to make death threats so this 10:10 of course I reported to the police local 10:12 authorities and and they investigated 10:14 they were able to confirm that the 10:15 information based on some of the other 10:17 things that they found or indeed the 10:19 origin of the information was indeed 10:21 from the Office of Personnel hack and 10:22 which of course as I mentioned earlier 10:25 is the origin of the people got it was 10:27 China now they weren’t able to find the 10:29 people and all that and the threats went 10:31 on for quite a little while and in 10:33 addition another little thing that’s 10:34 going on is just Chinese harassment of 10:36 federal employees again now myself 10:39 coming out of the CIA intelligence 10:41 background and other people like myself 10:43 is they make phone calls so it’s a 10:45 recorded message somebody calls it’s a 10:47 robo call and they start talking to you 10:49 in Chinese so I don’t speak Chinese most 10:51 people I know don’t speak Chinese and so 10:54 you’re kind of just digging up and let 10:55 it go don’t you know you’re not sure 10:57 what to think of it now found out that 10:59 in fact the translation is that that 11:02 that that there the Chinese a Chinese 11:06 person a woman speaking who says come to 11:08 the Chinese embassy your package is 11:10 waiting for you so it goes on and talks 11:12 about these things but sort of you know 11:14 I’m not sure to think of it I guess it’s 11:17 geared they’re calling everybody out 11:18 there that’s a formal federal employee 11:19 it’s a type of harassment and I guess 11:21 it’s a way hoping that somebody who’s 11:23 you know 11:25 speaks Chinese would be willing to go 11:26 into the embassy and find out what’s in 11:28 the package and it’s an interesting 11:30 little sidelight I was just telling the 11:32 story to another Rotarian CIA guy who’s 11:34 a friend of mine we were sitting down 11:35 for lunch talking 11:36 I finished telling him this whole story 11:38 and his phone rings because give me a 11:40 second picks up his phone and it’s that 11:41 phone call it was the Chinese lady 11:43 giving him her message kind of a 11:44 humorous little way it turns out but 11:46 these things are being used to try it 11:48 attack and surprise I do see those in 11:51 another event that just happened 11:54 recently a friend I do a lot of radio 11:58 interviews as well on television 12:00 different sorts of places I I do 12:02 interviews with and one of them was a 12:04 fairly well-known person I don’t want to 12:08 use his name but he does a lot of things 12:10 and has fairly big following and it does 12:13 a lot of things kind of in the 12:15 conservative Christian world and he had 12:18 a very interesting incident take place 12:20 just within the last few weeks that I 12:22 view as attempted murder and what 12:25 happened was there’s you know everyone’s 12:27 familiar with nine one one if there’s an 12:29 emergency you call on the phone for 911 12:31 one there’s also six one one which is if 12:33 you don’t call it in you text it in so 12:36 same idea it goes to the 911 one people 12:39 and they have the emergency and call it 12:40 out based on whatever the text message 12:42 is they received the text to about him 12:46 it said his address and made it had a 12:48 lot of very hot points that they made 12:51 that the police would really key off on 12:52 and the the basic gist of the message 12:56 was that I live in this house I have a 13:00 gun I’m gonna kill all my family and 13:02 I’ll kill any cops that show up and then 13:03 I’m gonna kill myself and so naturally 13:06 this has the cops all keyed up they 13:08 don’t know this this person they don’t 13:09 know the individual they don’t know what 13:10 he does for business that he’s not known 13:12 to them not a criminal so they wouldn’t 13:14 know 13:14 and they all show up at his house and 13:17 not wild bang on the door and they get 13:20 him out and set him on the curb search 13:22 him and go search the house and they’re 13:23 going you know where’s your gone and he 13:24 goes I don’t know no gun and they’re all 13:26 looking at each other going what is this 13:27 so I mean I I this is something that had 13:29 been set up by somebody hoping that they 13:32 could commit a murder 13:34 by manipulating the police force so a 13:37 very interesting thing I mean that’s a 13:39 very odd attack and this like I say 13:41 Philippine II I mean I’m stretching here 13:44 quite a little bit linking the the 13:46 different things that have gone on 13:48 together but there there are the 13:50 beginning indicators of a pattern here 13:52 and it may be that we start to see this 13:54 we are going into what everyone is 13:55 considered a very very important 13:58 election here in the US with Trump 14:00 running for reelection and the 14:02 Democratic Party basically disarray so 14:04 it would make sense in the scheme of 14:06 things that there are groups out there 14:08 that are trying to tamp down opposition 14:12 to the democratic way of life and 14:15 perspective and party so it is 14:18 conceivable that that conservatives are 14:20 now going into a new area of you know 14:22 more hyper targeting if you will that 14:24 sort of thing I kind of harken back to 14:27 one thing that I’ve often talked about 14:28 and that’s the the mass shooting that 14:31 took place in Las Vegas where a lot of 14:32 people were slaughtered that were 14:34 everyone considered them Trump 14:36 supporters because it was a 14:37 country-western concert where these 14:40 people were shot from the MGM hotel down 14:43 to the grounds were the konk where the 14:45 concert is taking place so a lot of 14:47 interesting things out of that there are 14:48 there are things that just weren’t 14:50 really the investigation just cut it off 14:52 right away basically once they found the 14:54 shooter dead in the hotel room they said 14:56 okay that’s done we don’t need to look 14:58 for anything else this is the guy he was 14:59 the one so case closed now there are a 15:02 lot of other things that were part of 15:04 that investigation one thing that’s 15:05 always stuck in my mind there was a 15:07 second room with a second window broken 15:08 out and the perpetrator the man was 15:11 found with gloves on his hands dead and 15:14 one shot to the to the face and the 15:18 other room had a second pair of gloves 15:20 that had clearly been used and left on 15:21 the bed there’s photographs of it in the 15:23 police report no not my information this 15:25 was the police report well who were 15:27 those close 15:28 they were never tested for DNA so 15:30 nothing was ever done with them that are 15:32 just not nothing was investigating past 15:34 that point and there’s a lot of 15:35 questions of that nature that just 15:36 should you know not proof that there was 15:39 a second person but as I say there’s a 15:42 lot of indicators that there were more 15:43 people involved than just the one 15:45 shooters so at the time – there was a 15:48 couple of groups that took credit for 15:50 this one of them which was in Tifa there 15:54 was initially some I believe it was 15:56 Twitter might have been Facebook but an 15:59 Australian and Tifa group took credit 16:01 saying well they’re members from the 16:04 Australian antifa had been involved with 16:08 his shooting now has it taken off and 16:10 then people denied it and said oh this 16:12 wasn’t real but you know the people and 16:15 other people I’ve talked to have looked 16:17 at it and said there’s no indicators 16:19 that this is a false thing it was put on 16:21 by the right people and taken off by the 16:23 right people so it looks like it could 16:26 have definitely been real antiva taking 16:29 credit for this so now again no proof of 16:32 this but you know it looks like this 16:35 made there may have been some 16:36 association with with with antifoam with 16:40 this shooting and these are the types of 16:42 things now Philippine II was out in 16:44 California and we’ve seen I mean an Tifa 16:47 really kind of has a lot of sway a lot 16:50 of influence and a lot of power out on 16:52 the west coast we saw riots in Portland 16:55 Oregon where they just ran the streets 16:56 and the police stood back and they seem 16:58 to be closely associated with the 17:00 Portland Police Force which strikes me 17:03 as very bass-ackwards very strange and 17:06 so there and their strength they’re 17:08 centered out of San Diego I believe is 17:11 where they kind of originated in the 17:13 United States and spread from there so 17:15 essentially their headquarters if you 17:17 will is in California so this is their 17:19 backyard Philippine II was in their 17:21 backyard so as I said I don’t want to 17:24 get too far out into this claiming all 17:25 this is real and just happened this way 17:27 of these things but this is like we’re 17:29 in the very early stages and we’re we’re 17:31 looking at all of these things going hmm 17:33 you know these things are starting to 17:35 line up now we need to go look at it and 17:36 find out if this is true or not and I 17:38 would I would I would 17:40 categorize it that way it’s it’s 17:41 becoming very odd to me I don’t like the 17:44 coincident coincidences I don’t like the 17:46 similar methodology a lot of the things 17:49 about all this are starting to bother me 17:50 and I’m suggesting that it that that 17:55 there there’s a possibility of there 17:57 being relations between all of these 17:59 things that they’re interrelated in some 18:01 way as part of an organized effort so 18:03 we’ll see the a lot more information 18:05 will come up particularly about 18:07 Philippine II like I said Seth rich I 18:09 don’t know unless somehow WikiLeaks come 18:12 his forthcoming at some point but I 18:14 doubt that they would do that because it 18:16 would tend to endanger any other people 18:18 coming forward in the future giving them 18:20 information so it will be it’ll be 18:24 interesting to see and if there’s other 18:25 people out there that are being targeted 18:27 and you know in similar ways to the 18:30 radio persons that I mentioned earlier 18:32 if that’s going on in other places in 18:35 the United States that would be very 18:36 interesting fact to put together if it’s 18:38 if there’s been three or four or five 18:39 similar things then we know that 18:42 somebody’s running an operation and that 18:45 would be very dangerous then then and 18:47 we’d need to pull out all the stops but 18:48 we’ll see it’s getting interesting Please follow and like us: Continue Reading Previous Brad Johnson on Adam Schiff’s most recent attack on President Trump and on reality and truthNext Brad Johnson on Wuhan Flu design possibilities Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.