Interview Brad Johnson on the shooting death of Phil Haney 7 months ago Brad Johnson and Brad Johnson this is February the 00:02 22nd of 2020 and a tragic event happened 00:08 last night a person I did not know but 00:11 from all I have seen was was both a 00:13 tremendously important individual in 00:16 terms of his exposing some of the darker 00:19 forces at work in our Western states as 00:22 well as just being a terrifically nice 00:24 guy was murdered the best information I 00:27 have is somewhere outside his car 00:29 somewhere in his home state Phil Haney I 00:33 believe he was a Department of Homeland 00:35 Security whistleblower correct 00:37 particularly focused on what the Obama 00:40 administration appeared to be doing that 00:42 were certainly against the interests of 00:43 a constitutional America and I think you 00:47 have some other data points that while 00:50 may not be conclusive would be what 00:52 science might call indicative toward a 00:54 pattern why don’t you just take it from 00:56 there all right very good so Philip a 00:59 knee first as you correctly pointed out 01:01 is DHS Department Homeland Security he 01:03 was one of the guys that went in and 01:04 very early into DHS so he was kind of 01:07 end of the you know the founding member 01:09 crew he was part of that back group of 01:12 people from the very beginning got out 01:14 it was the older man now in his later 01:16 70s I believe now and he was found dead 01:18 shot the very few details on the actual 01:21 death but it appears to be murder he was 01:24 apparently shot in the chest 01:26 some reports are saying in the back well 01:28 we’ll see but different different 01:30 reports have come out with conflicting 01:32 information on the details 01:33 overall they all agree that he was shot 01:36 and what people are all saying is murder 01:38 now don’t know yet that all has to be 01:40 confirmed we’ll have to see but those 01:41 are what the early reports are 01:43 indicating now Philip Nene himself was 01:46 one of the very first actual true live 01:49 honest-to-god whistleblowers that was 01:50 out there reporting on corruption the 01:54 corruption that was he was reporting on 01:55 if everyone thinks back to the Obama 01:58 administration one of the things that 01:59 they were pushing is kind of backing off 02:02 on counterterrorism issues so they were 02:04 trying to you know show I have always 02:08 described it as sort of a two-pronged 02:09 strategy where one they took the 02:11 pressure off terrorism which they 02:13 absolutely 02:13 did all of terrorist groups and to then 02:16 said oh you know we’re all friends their 02:18 expectation at the time was that you 02:20 know they’re they’re taking the pressure 02:22 off terrorist groups and reach out the 02:23 olive branch and they expected that 02:25 terrorists would look out and say oh 02:26 okay well the Americans don’t really 02:28 mean it introduced any harm 02:29 you know just ordinarily naive but I 02:32 guess that was what they were after and 02:34 and the reasoning behind this this kind 02:37 of two-pronged strategy 02:38 so part of what they were doing in the 02:40 background was removing all of this 02:41 information about terrorists and 02:43 terrorist groups now there are those 02:44 that theorized that there was a more 02:46 malicious intent behind this going on 02:48 and philip touched on some of those 02:50 aspects of it that because this is so 02:52 purposeful that it was done 02:55 intentionally – you know it made life 02:57 much much easier for terrorist groups so 02:59 I’ll put it that way and once that 03:01 information is gone it’s very difficult 03:02 to get it back because you have a body 03:04 of things that you collect over time and 03:05 if it’s all just taken away then to 03:07 recreate it all of that body of 03:09 knowledge –is is difficult because it 03:10 wasn’t one monolithic thing that you got 03:13 it was bits and pieces that that fit 03:15 together and give you a picture of 03:16 what’s going on in these terrorist 03:17 groups so a lot of that was being erased 03:19 out of DHS which let me say that was not 03:23 something that took place only in DHS 03:25 that was the intelligence community wide 03:27 which is one of the reasons why I always 03:30 talk about these issues because what 03:32 happens if it the CIA and NSA and DHS 03:35 and DNI at all of these places you see 03:38 this information sort of get you know 03:40 deleted and erased and you’re starting 03:42 over without all of it and all of these 03:44 people look at it is great and grand and 03:46 wonderful you know you got to look at 03:47 that go why and it’s one of the reasons 03:49 why the intelligence information that’s 03:51 going up to the president United States 03:53 and the White House and my opinion is is 03:56 tends to be just poor I’ll put it that 04:00 way it just doesn’t tend to be very good 04:01 it certainly doesn’t hold up to the 04:03 standards of what could be done what 04:05 should be done what used to be done 04:06 those sorts of things so this 04:09 degradation in capability is one of the 04:11 my pet peeves one of the things I really 04:13 argue vehemently to point out to people 04:15 to try and rebuild I will add one more 04:17 comment on that the same people at the 04:20 CIA that were in charge under Obama with 04:23 the exception of John Brennan who’s now 04:25 was was fired are all still there the 04:28 the director of the CIA was a close 04:30 friend and Lieutenant of John Brennan 04:34 and all of the people in leadership 04:36 they’re all the same so these policies 04:38 haven’t been turned around yet and it’s 04:39 something that President Trump I think 04:41 he’s just now beginning to understand 04:43 it’s just how deep this goes and the 04:44 problems that are there now Philip Haney 04:46 let’s you know there’s some assumptions 04:48 here there as I said the initial 04:49 information is that he was murdered and 04:51 one of the things as you mentioned I I 04:53 look at this and and I always say you 04:56 know I don’t really like coincidences 04:57 it’s the background to it and training 04:59 and experience but I just don’t like 05:00 coincidences and we we start to see some 05:03 stuff I want to mention a couple of 05:04 different cases some of which are 05:06 publicly known and some of which are not 05:08 but one of the ones that was publicly 05:10 known as death rich pretty famous case a 05:12 lot of reporting on it Seth rich was at 05:14 a bar at night coming home was a block 05:16 away from his house got shot twice in 05:18 the back ambulance got there and he died 05:21 like an hour and a half later now there 05:24 were some lot of initial reporting about 05:25 this because you know he wasn’t robbed 05:27 but the claim is that it was an 05:29 attempted robbery and apparently there 05:32 were some bruises on him and some 05:33 fisticuffs going on and and so they 05:35 they’re claiming based on that that it 05:37 was a robbery Seth Rich’s families is 05:39 this and they’ve got a lot of if you 05:41 look down the list of who supports it 05:43 they’re all liberal organizations saying 05:44 oh yeah this is Seth Richie was an 05:46 attempted robbery and that’s it anyone 05:48 who says anything difference lying but 05:50 there’s there’s a couple of things to it 05:52 now there was initially an investigator 05:54 or police investigator that came out and 05:56 took a look at it and he was drawing 05:58 some links between Seth rich and 06:00 WikiLeaks and saying that Seth rich 06:02 might have been the source of the leaks 06:04 now the family was saying that this is 06:05 nut job stuff it’s absolutely crazy and 06:08 as I said that list of people you know 06:10 it’s thing the New York Times in the 06:12 Washington Post and people like that are 06:14 all saying it’s nonsense so I mean you 06:16 know them saying that I personally don’t 06:19 consider that very significant or 06:21 important because what else are they 06:22 going to say I mean if it’s true they’ll 06:24 say it’s you know that it was just a 06:26 robbery that’s what they’ll say if it’s 06:27 not true that it was more than a robbery 06:29 they’ll still say that’s all it was so 06:31 now the family of course was very upset 06:33 by this that I understand perfectly 06:35 they’ve sued a number of people that 06:36 talked about it but 06:37 here’s the issue at least it’s what’s 06:40 come out now 06:40 there was this link to WikiLeaks that 06:44 was initially uncovered by the 06:46 investigations but then said to be 06:48 insignificant and it goes back to the 06:51 Russia leak that all this stuff was 06:53 hacked by Russia and that that’s where 06:55 all of those wiki leak documents came 06:57 from was the Russians so could I just 07:00 hide it can I just cut and dad two quick 07:01 points though yes in fact a song is 07:04 categorically stated actually three 07:06 points categorically stated all of his 07:09 material was leaked so none of it was 07:11 hacks and to that he did offer a large 07:15 reward for whoever killed Seth rich and 07:19 while you stopped short of saying that 07:21 Southridge was his source on these on 07:23 these DNC leaks he did say that he felt 07:25 it was when he was asked why he was 07:27 posting this unprecedented reward he 07:29 said we have to protect our sources 07:31 well you’ve you’ve hit on precisely 07:34 where I was headed with this I mean the 07:36 the the the take home fact out of that 07:38 is is what you’re saying there it was 07:40 was like I said that was exactly where I 07:42 was headed that the the the one thing 07:45 that makes you question this is Julian 07:46 Assange making a number of different 07:48 comments not all in a row but at 07:50 different times and offering the reward 07:52 later upping the reward to I think a 07:54 hundred and twenty five thousand and yet 07:57 denying that that that this guy was the 08:01 source but yet then going on and saying 08:02 well we have to protect our sources and 08:04 that’s why I’m giving the reward so a 08:06 lot of conflicting information out of 08:07 that but all indicators are that that 08:10 based on what Julian Assange is saying 08:11 is that he was indeed Etheridge was 08:15 indeed based on on the Santas comments 08:18 that what he was indeed the source of 08:20 these these leaked documents that 08:22 WikiLeaks had I don’t know I don’t think 08:24 we’ll ever find out I think the salient 08:27 point important point I wanted to make 08:28 out of it is that based on what its aunt 08:30 is saying Assange well while denying it 08:32 still sort of semi confirmed that Seth 08:35 rich was the source so we may never know 08:38 on that end of it but if that is true if 08:41 it were to turn out to be true if we 08:43 ever learned that if Assange 08:44 ever admits to it or WikiLeaks ever 08:46 confirms it something along those lines 08:48 then you know you have to pretty 08:50 to conclude that this was a politically 08:52 motivated murder now again the 08:54 Philippine II is kind of in the same 08:55 boat we just don’t know but it’s 08:57 certainly the type of guy that there 09:00 would be there would be political motive 09:01 to murder whether he was murdered 09:04 whether these two individuals were 09:05 murdered or not we don’t know now let me 09:07 get on to some of the things I wanted to 09:09 mention that are kind of not in the 09:10 public realm and one of them on just I 09:13 can say personal story out of all of 09:16 this and then then one other from a 09:17 contact of mine now in in in my case I 09:22 was one of the individuals being a 09:23 federal employee having been a for 09:25 federal employee the Office of Personnel 09:28 Management got hacked by China and all 09:31 that’s been widely reported so all of 09:33 the personnel records were in that 09:35 information that was hacked by China so 09:37 phone number addresses Social Security 09:40 everything they have everything the 09:42 information that you have to provide to 09:43 the federal government in order to be 09:45 employed there as extensive I mean it 09:47 has information about your parents and 09:49 grandparents and just everything that’s 09:50 in there your schools everything so all 09:53 of that was hacked out of China now in 09:54 my particular case that information 09:57 somehow was provided through from China 10:01 their point of origin on the information 10:03 was China ended up here in the United 10:05 States to certain group them calling me 10:08 and began to make death threats so this 10:10 of course I reported to the police local 10:12 authorities and and they investigated 10:14 they were able to confirm that the 10:15 information based on some of the other 10:17 things that they found or indeed the 10:19 origin of the information was indeed 10:21 from the Office of Personnel hack and 10:22 which of course as I mentioned earlier 10:25 is the origin of the people got it was 10:27 China now they weren’t able to find the 10:29 people and all that and the threats went 10:31 on for quite a little while and in 10:33 addition another little thing that’s 10:34 going on is just Chinese harassment of 10:36 federal employees again now myself 10:39 coming out of the CIA intelligence 10:41 background and other people like myself 10:43 is they make phone calls so it’s a 10:45 recorded message somebody calls it’s a 10:47 robo call and they start talking to you 10:49 in Chinese so I don’t speak Chinese most 10:51 people I know don’t speak Chinese and so 10:54 you’re kind of just digging up and let 10:55 it go don’t you know you’re not sure 10:57 what to think of it now found out that 10:59 in fact the translation is that that 11:02 that that there the Chinese a Chinese 11:06 person a woman speaking who says come to 11:08 the Chinese embassy your package is 11:10 waiting for you so it goes on and talks 11:12 about these things but sort of you know 11:14 I’m not sure to think of it I guess it’s 11:17 geared they’re calling everybody out 11:18 there that’s a formal federal employee 11:19 it’s a type of harassment and I guess 11:21 it’s a way hoping that somebody who’s 11:23 you know 11:25 speaks Chinese would be willing to go 11:26 into the embassy and find out what’s in 11:28 the package and it’s an interesting 11:30 little sidelight I was just telling the 11:32 story to another Rotarian CIA guy who’s 11:34 a friend of mine we were sitting down 11:35 for lunch talking 11:36 I finished telling him this whole story 11:38 and his phone rings because give me a 11:40 second picks up his phone and it’s that 11:41 phone call it was the Chinese lady 11:43 giving him her message kind of a 11:44 humorous little way it turns out but 11:46 these things are being used to try it 11:48 attack and surprise I do see those in 11:51 another event that just happened 11:54 recently a friend I do a lot of radio 11:58 interviews as well on television 12:00 different sorts of places I I do 12:02 interviews with and one of them was a 12:04 fairly well-known person I don’t want to 12:08 use his name but he does a lot of things 12:10 and has fairly big following and it does 12:13 a lot of things kind of in the 12:15 conservative Christian world and he had 12:18 a very interesting incident take place 12:20 just within the last few weeks that I 12:22 view as attempted murder and what 12:25 happened was there’s you know everyone’s 12:27 familiar with nine one one if there’s an 12:29 emergency you call on the phone for 911 12:31 one there’s also six one one which is if 12:33 you don’t call it in you text it in so 12:36 same idea it goes to the 911 one people 12:39 and they have the emergency and call it 12:40 out based on whatever the text message 12:42 is they received the text to about him 12:46 it said his address and made it had a 12:48 lot of very hot points that they made 12:51 that the police would really key off on 12:52 and the the basic gist of the message 12:56 was that I live in this house I have a 13:00 gun I’m gonna kill all my family and 13:02 I’ll kill any cops that show up and then 13:03 I’m gonna kill myself and so naturally 13:06 this has the cops all keyed up they 13:08 don’t know this this person they don’t 13:09 know the individual they don’t know what 13:10 he does for business that he’s not known 13:12 to them not a criminal so they wouldn’t 13:14 know 13:14 and they all show up at his house and 13:17 not wild bang on the door and they get 13:20 him out and set him on the curb search 13:22 him and go search the house and they’re 13:23 going you know where’s your gone and he 13:24 goes I don’t know no gun and they’re all 13:26 looking at each other going what is this 13:27 so I mean I I this is something that had 13:29 been set up by somebody hoping that they 13:32 could commit a murder 13:34 by manipulating the police force so a 13:37 very interesting thing I mean that’s a 13:39 very odd attack and this like I say 13:41 Philippine II I mean I’m stretching here 13:44 quite a little bit linking the the 13:46 different things that have gone on 13:48 together but there there are the 13:50 beginning indicators of a pattern here 13:52 and it may be that we start to see this 13:54 we are going into what everyone is 13:55 considered a very very important 13:58 election here in the US with Trump 14:00 running for reelection and the 14:02 Democratic Party basically disarray so 14:04 it would make sense in the scheme of 14:06 things that there are groups out there 14:08 that are trying to tamp down opposition 14:12 to the democratic way of life and 14:15 perspective and party so it is 14:18 conceivable that that conservatives are 14:20 now going into a new area of you know 14:22 more hyper targeting if you will that 14:24 sort of thing I kind of harken back to 14:27 one thing that I’ve often talked about 14:28 and that’s the the mass shooting that 14:31 took place in Las Vegas where a lot of 14:32 people were slaughtered that were 14:34 everyone considered them Trump 14:36 supporters because it was a 14:37 country-western concert where these 14:40 people were shot from the MGM hotel down 14:43 to the grounds were the konk where the 14:45 concert is taking place so a lot of 14:47 interesting things out of that there are 14:48 there are things that just weren’t 14:50 really the investigation just cut it off 14:52 right away basically once they found the 14:54 shooter dead in the hotel room they said 14:56 okay that’s done we don’t need to look 14:58 for anything else this is the guy he was 14:59 the one so case closed now there are a 15:02 lot of other things that were part of 15:04 that investigation one thing that’s 15:05 always stuck in my mind there was a 15:07 second room with a second window broken 15:08 out and the perpetrator the man was 15:11 found with gloves on his hands dead and 15:14 one shot to the to the face and the 15:18 other room had a second pair of gloves 15:20 that had clearly been used and left on 15:21 the bed there’s photographs of it in the 15:23 police report no not my information this 15:25 was the police report well who were 15:27 those close 15:28 they were never tested for DNA so 15:30 nothing was ever done with them that are 15:32 just not nothing was investigating past 15:34 that point and there’s a lot of 15:35 questions of that nature that just 15:36 should you know not proof that there was 15:39 a second person but as I say there’s a 15:42 lot of indicators that there were more 15:43 people involved than just the one 15:45 shooters so at the time – there was a 15:48 couple of groups that took credit for 15:50 this one of them which was in Tifa there 15:54 was initially some I believe it was 15:56 Twitter might have been Facebook but an 15:59 Australian and Tifa group took credit 16:01 saying well they’re members from the 16:04 Australian antifa had been involved with 16:08 his shooting now has it taken off and 16:10 then people denied it and said oh this 16:12 wasn’t real but you know the people and 16:15 other people I’ve talked to have looked 16:17 at it and said there’s no indicators 16:19 that this is a false thing it was put on 16:21 by the right people and taken off by the 16:23 right people so it looks like it could 16:26 have definitely been real antiva taking 16:29 credit for this so now again no proof of 16:32 this but you know it looks like this 16:35 made there may have been some 16:36 association with with with antifoam with 16:40 this shooting and these are the types of 16:42 things now Philippine II was out in 16:44 California and we’ve seen I mean an Tifa 16:47 really kind of has a lot of sway a lot 16:50 of influence and a lot of power out on 16:52 the west coast we saw riots in Portland 16:55 Oregon where they just ran the streets 16:56 and the police stood back and they seem 16:58 to be closely associated with the 17:00 Portland Police Force which strikes me 17:03 as very bass-ackwards very strange and 17:06 so there and their strength they’re 17:08 centered out of San Diego I believe is 17:11 where they kind of originated in the 17:13 United States and spread from there so 17:15 essentially their headquarters if you 17:17 will is in California so this is their 17:19 backyard Philippine II was in their 17:21 backyard so as I said I don’t want to 17:24 get too far out into this claiming all 17:25 this is real and just happened this way 17:27 of these things but this is like we’re 17:29 in the very early stages and we’re we’re 17:31 looking at all of these things going hmm 17:33 you know these things are starting to 17:35 line up now we need to go look at it and 17:36 find out if this is true or not and I 17:38 would I would I would 17:40 categorize it that way it’s it’s 17:41 becoming very odd to me I don’t like the 17:44 coincident coincidences I don’t like the 17:46 similar methodology a lot of the things 17:49 about all this are starting to bother me 17:50 and I’m suggesting that it that that 17:55 there there’s a possibility of there 17:57 being relations between all of these 17:59 things that they’re interrelated in some 18:01 way as part of an organized effort so 18:03 we’ll see the a lot more information 18:05 will come up particularly about 18:07 Philippine II like I said Seth rich I 18:09 don’t know unless somehow WikiLeaks come 18:12 his forthcoming at some point but I 18:14 doubt that they would do that because it 18:16 would tend to endanger any other people 18:18 coming forward in the future giving them 18:20 information so it will be it’ll be 18:24 interesting to see and if there’s other 18:25 people out there that are being targeted 18:27 and you know in similar ways to the 18:30 radio persons that I mentioned earlier 18:32 if that’s going on in other places in 18:35 the United States that would be very 18:36 interesting fact to put together if it’s 18:38 if there’s been three or four or five 18:39 similar things then we know that 18:42 somebody’s running an operation and that 18:45 would be very dangerous then then and 18:47 we’d need to pull out all the stops but 18:48 we’ll see it’s getting interesting Continue Reading Previous Brad Johnson on Adam Schiff’s most recent attack on President Trump and on reality and truthNext Brad Johnson on Wuhan Flu design possibilities Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.