What does Impeachment mean and other news analysis

Swalwell and the Chinese Honey Trap

Big League Politics interview with retired CIA officer Brad Johnson on Chinese spy within the Senator Feinstein organization


[Music]
00:05
so
00:06
this is january the 15th of 2021
00:11
uh you know it’s difficult to follow
00:14
what’s going on in the state so far
00:16
uh politically sure looks to me like
00:19
there was a massive set up
00:21
uh to make it false was the right tag
00:24
fire
00:25
false flag at the capitol buildings
00:28
and uh that appears to have been an
00:30
excuse
00:31
to do a second impeachment i have to say
00:34
that’s
00:35
to quote a twitter a tweet i saw that’s
00:37
pretty badass that trump got impeached
00:39
twice it kind of makes me admire him
00:41
even more
00:42
uh he must be one hell of a threat but i
00:44
what i
00:45
before you you know the update is can
00:47
you explain a bit what impeachment is
00:49
because
00:49
you know i kind of had the impression
00:51
that if you were impeached as a
00:52
president you no longer had any power
00:54
like you weren’t president
00:55
so i guess that’s not what it was and
00:58
how do you get in peace twice i just
00:59
don’t get it
01:00
can you explain all that please well you
01:02
have to be convicted of the impeachment
01:04
if you’re convicted then you’re thrown
01:05
out of the office of presidency
01:07
so in this particular case it’s kind of
01:10
uh you know it’s
01:11
it’s clearly there is a second agenda
01:14
here
01:15
since the impeachment can’t even be
01:18
completed in the process it’d have to be
01:20
passed in the
01:21
you know they voted to impeach him they
01:23
had 10 republicans
01:24
uh join with the democrats to to vote to
01:28
impeach the president and then it has to
01:29
be
01:31
tried the house puts on a a
01:34
supposedly a trial for the uh
01:38
everybody to watch but then the senate
01:39
has to vote on it and they have to
01:41
uh they have to i think it’s a
01:43
two-thirds majority then
01:44
has to vote for impeachment i i don’t
01:47
think that is a
01:48
a number that can be achieved without
01:49
quite a few republican
01:51
uh republicans joining in but you know i
01:54
don’t know in this day and age almost
01:55
anything is possible
01:56
once he’s impeached then he’s thrown out
01:58
as president of course this cannot be
02:00
completed as i was saying
02:02
before trump is out on the 20th the 20th
02:05
is only five days away this is the 15th
02:07
so the the new president will be
02:09
inaugurated
02:10
so after trump has already gone from
02:13
office
02:14
can he be impeached you know that
02:16
question hasn’t really been answered and
02:17
i’m not sure he can
02:19
but if he is somehow impeached
02:24
sometime after leaving office as
02:26
president
02:27
what it does is it blocks him from
02:29
running for president again
02:31
supposedly but i’m again this this
02:35
raises a lot of questions in my mind
02:37
if you’re impeached when you’re not
02:38
president you know i
02:40
is it legitimately going to stop you
02:42
from running for federal office again
02:44
and you know i i just don’t know i mean
02:46
this is going to be kind of new
02:47
territory
02:48
but as i said it’s clearly a hindi
02:51
hidden agenda item or a second agenda
02:53
item
02:54
and nancy pelosi has said very openly
02:56
and now there’s a lot of other people
02:58
coming in and saying
02:59
very openly that this is to stop
03:01
president trump for running president
03:03
for president again in 2024. so the only
03:07
reason they’re doing it is because
03:09
they they’ve they’ve cheated to get him
03:10
out and now they want to make sure he
03:12
never has a chance to set it right so
03:14
that’s what’s going on with it now some
03:16
of the
03:17
the irony in all of this is just
03:21
you know astounding to me because
03:24
who’s in charge of the impeachment and
03:26
of course
03:27
it’s a the majority democrats in the
03:29
house so they run the show so they put
03:32
whoever in charge that they want of the
03:34
impeachment process
03:36
and who is it it’s congressman swalwell
03:39
congressman swalwell is the guy that was
03:42
sleeping with the russian
03:44
uh spy who was funneling money into his
03:47
campaign
03:48
so you’ve got this guy that’s been
03:50
cooperating to some degree or another
03:52
with chinese espionage who’s in charge
03:55
of the impeachment
03:56
and i just it’s just beyond
04:00
me so here you have this thing
04:04
this impeachment that’s turning out to
04:06
be between
04:08
do you want to give the guy who was
04:11
arguably the best president we’ve ever
04:14
had
04:15
certainly for the economy of the united
04:17
states
04:18
and for how he handled foreign relations
04:21
and fighting back against china for u.s
04:23
interests and all those sorts of things
04:24
you have arguably the best president of
04:26
the united states
04:28
so you can either vote for him or
04:31
you can vote for a guy cooperating with
04:33
chinese spies with a lot with a
04:35
democratic party that’s closely
04:36
associated with china
04:38
with a president that’s coming in whose
04:39
son was disposed supposedly and not
04:42
negotiating for a 10 million vibe with
04:43
china and dianne feinstein who
04:46
is has made over i don’t know three or
04:48
four hundred million dollars with china
04:50
through her husband
04:51
and had a chinese spy on her staff
04:54
so it it it looks like you either vote
04:57
for
04:57
china or you vote for trump who was an
05:01
excellent president united states
05:03
and it’s the irony of all of this is
05:05
just astounding to me
05:07
but one thing i want to say to you to
05:10
any listener to the american public in
05:11
particular
05:12
and this is a little bit dry but i would
05:14
like to go through very quickly
05:16
one of the things that we need to do is
05:18
oh one last thing too on that
05:20
before i get into the list one of the
05:23
things that’s happened
05:24
is now everybody saw that vice president
05:26
trump our vice president pence stabbed
05:28
trump in the back
05:29
refused to support him to try to get all
05:31
of this stuff in front of the public
05:33
where everybody could see
05:35
the different things that were irregular
05:36
about these votes that took place
05:38
and the voting changes that they used
05:41
that aren’t allowed by those laws of
05:43
that state
05:44
they did it anyway so a lot of this
05:46
stuff was just flat out illegal
05:48
and that was the guy that stabbed him in
05:50
the back was vp pence
05:52
already you’re seeing them try to prop
05:54
up pence
05:55
and newt gingrich came out was saying
05:57
that pence was a profiling courage and
05:59
this great man and all this
06:00
and now today you’re having a lot more
06:02
people come out they’re already pumping
06:04
him up and building him as the candidate
06:06
for 2024 and every loyal
06:10
patriot in the united states of america
06:12
needs to make sure
06:14
that pence understands he’s toast
06:16
politically
06:17
because that that type of behavior
06:20
should not be rewarded and the same
06:22
thing for the 10 republicans
06:24
i just want to mention that also voted
06:27
for impeachment
06:28
there’s one uh herrera in washington
06:31
state
06:32
uh if in the third district if you’re in
06:35
the third district call in and
06:37
let him know that you know he’s that
06:38
you’re going to try to get him out next
06:40
election
06:40
uh capco out of new york in the 24th
06:44
district
06:45
kissinger and 16th district in illinois
06:49
uh peter meyer in michigan third
06:52
district
06:53
a new house in the fourth district in
06:56
washington state again
06:57
uh south carolina tom wright seventh
07:00
district
07:01
and fred upton michigan sixth district
07:04
uh vallado valladol in california david
07:07
valladel
07:08
21st district in california all of these
07:11
guys
07:12
are people that if you’re from those
07:14
districts please call in
07:16
give them heck over the phone now it’s
07:18
very important
07:20
don’t be rude or aggressive or
07:22
threatening or any of those things
07:23
because they won’t listen to you and
07:25
they won’t tabulate it
07:26
but if you’re polite and firm and just
07:29
let them know
07:30
that you find that despicable and it
07:31
shouldn’t have been done and that
07:33
recognition has to be given to president
07:35
trump for the economy
07:36
for what he did protecting u.s interests
07:39
for what he did on kovid
07:40
you start pushing those sorts of things
07:42
of the what trump has done
07:44
that’s right and they’ll listen and put
07:45
that down and they take those things
07:47
into account
07:48
they actually have formulas where they
07:50
calculate so many people calling in
07:52
represents
07:52
this amount of the public and therefore
07:54
i need to take it into account when it
07:56
reaches a certain threshold
07:58
so if anyone’s interested in doing that
08:00
and you’re from those districts
08:01
they will listen to you if you’re polite
08:04
and to the point you’ll only be talking
08:06
to some like intern or something
08:08
you won’t talk to anybody that’s
08:10
important but they will tabulate what
08:12
you say
08:13
so it does make a difference and that’s
08:15
one of the ways that we can begin to
08:17
fight back on this but
08:18
like i said this is boiling down to
08:21
whose side are you on
08:22
are you on team america
08:26
or are you on team washington and china
08:30
and i think that’s that’s what this is
08:32
boiled down to there’s
08:33
so much corruption so closely tied to
08:36
china
08:36
out of the democratic party that it’s
08:38
kind of confusing who
08:40
they really represent and these are the
08:42
ways that we can start to fight back
08:44
that’s legal and ethical that we can do
08:46
and it’s make them pay the political
08:48
price
08:49
so i’m hoping that this is one of the
08:50
things that will gain some popularity
08:52
and people will start to move
08:54
and start to try and make make it
08:56
possible for us to get a responsible
08:58
government and responsible
09:00
representatives in our states
09:02
so there’s a video i have to ask you
09:04
there’s a video that’s circulating
09:06
a number of people sent in to me four or
09:08
five at least
09:09
of general mchenry i believe probably
09:11
saying his name wrong but
09:13
general mchenry mcinerney who
09:16
is explaining things about the laptop
09:19
which i
09:20
have some trouble understanding how they
09:22
could be true
09:24
because if in fact special forces had
09:27
taken her laptop
09:28
it seems to me that it would be outside
09:31
of like you couldn’t go to a court of
09:32
law
09:33
and say and present anything that they
09:36
found on it
09:36
because there was no warrant there was
09:38
no i mean it wasn’t taken
09:40
in the normal course of affairs unless
09:42
there’s some special provision
09:44
i mean uh can you can you speak to
09:46
general mckenna
09:47
mchenry’s claims mcinerney yeah
09:50
it’s it’s uh there’s there actually is
09:53
uh oddly enough uh a
09:55
uh i i don’t know if special provision
09:58
in the law is the right way to describe
09:59
it but there is a
10:01
part of the law that if i have proof
10:05
that you did something illegal and uh
10:08
i get that to the court i give it to the
10:11
court
10:12
it doesn’t matter how it got to court
10:14
that’s the way the laws work if it’s
10:16
proof of guilt
10:17
they’ll use it in that court even if it
10:20
was obtained illegally by me or
10:22
something now
10:22
that’s not law enforcement not following
10:24
the rules of evidence and all of that
10:26
that’s a separate thing
10:27
but if if someone if just some person
10:30
gets it
10:30
then and it ends up in court it can
10:32
still be used as evidence
10:34
now the problem with that is that if i
10:37
stole it
10:38
and then walk into the court and go hi
10:40
judge i stole this here it is this
10:42
proves this guy’s guilty
10:44
i then also face the penalty of law
10:46
because i stole it that’s illegal
10:48
and there would be a price to pay for me
10:50
so if this is true and i’ve heard many
10:52
of these rumors and seen these
10:54
these stories as well and and i’ve heard
10:56
that it was a
10:57
a special forces op that they went in
10:59
and they planned all along to get the
11:01
laptop
11:02
they went in and got it got out and that
11:03
they have people that are experts
11:05
exploiting these things and that they’re
11:07
putting together whatever’s on there and
11:08
i’m hearing rumors of
11:10
there’s all sorts of wild and crazy
11:11
stuff on there
11:13
so i’m hearing all of this stuff but
11:15
proof is in the pudding you know when
11:16
it’s out there we’ll we’ll see
11:19
also there’s a video kind of
11:20
interestingly along these same lines
11:22
there’s a video of a guy who’s an antifa
11:24
black lives matter activist
11:26
who was one of the people that invaded
11:27
the capitol building was telling people
11:29
hey
11:29
let’s burn this place down and taking
11:31
videos of it and all of that now
11:33
he is one of the people that’s been
11:35
arrested for
11:37
breaking into the capitol building and
11:39
has
11:40
separately confessed to being antifa
11:43
black lives matter and so we we know who
11:45
he was so we know
11:47
at least in part those people that
11:50
invaded the capitol building over which
11:51
there’s been such a fur
11:53
were not trump supporters there was at
11:55
least an element of people within them
11:58
that were antifa and black lives matter
12:00
people
12:01
trying to masquerade as trump supporters
12:04
in order to create this problem so it’s
12:06
not an open and shut thing now
12:09
that has been played on cnn and some
12:11
other places they’ve
12:12
they’ve identified this guy and
12:14
interviewed him where he was talking
12:15
about some of this stuff so
12:17
it’s an interesting change in the in the
12:19
story that’s being told
12:21
uh it’ll be suppressed here eventually
12:22
by mainstream media because they don’t
12:24
they can’t allow the
12:25
truth to come out but uh it is an
12:28
interesting aspect to it so
12:29
we’ll see about this this uh nancy
12:32
pelosi
12:33
laptop there hasn’t been confirmation
12:36
that i’ve seen of any official kind
12:38
that the laptop was even stolen however
12:41
there’s a lot of
12:42
kind of circumstantial evidence which
12:44
convinces me it’s true
12:46
like apparently they went after a hotel
12:48
where they thought these guys might be
12:49
holed up
12:50
and secured the perimeter not letting
12:52
people out until they could go in and
12:53
look
12:54
and stuff like that so interesting just
12:56
by the way the fellow’s name is john
12:58
sullivan
12:59
the guy who’s already now facing charges
13:03
who is a blm slash antifa activist
13:07
that uh he actually encouraged other
13:09
people
13:10
to break into the capital and it turns
13:12
out there was also
13:13
a cnn reporter that was on scene too so
13:16
that’s interesting
13:17
yes exactly right uh yeah so we’ll see
13:20
how all of this plays out
13:22
and uh like i said for anyone that’s
13:24
that’s that is an answer it was not all
13:26
trump supporters
13:27
in fact it was the opposite it was trump
13:29
detractors at least in part
13:49
[Music]
14:08
[Music]
14:12
you
Click for entire transcript

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial