An honest review of House Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene

Ms Greene has been relieved of her committee appointments by Congress for alleged anti-semitic comments and for believing Q conspiracies. She also demonstrates her head can be in the right place to make a contribution to the U.S. Brad Johnson analyses her inconsistent behavior. Also discussed is Swalwell’s assignment to head up former President Trump’s impeachment amid questions about his ties to China.

 

Please subscribe and follow for in-depth coverage you will not see in mainstream media. Support independent, conservative media and avoid narrative-censored content. Visit intelreform.org for an extensive library of articles and interviews.

Brad Johnson retired as a Senior Operations Officer and Chief of Station with the Central Intelligence Agency’s Directorate of Operations. He has served domestically and abroad with numerous assignments often during periods of armed conflict. He has served overseas in direct support of the War against Terrorism.
Mr. Johnson is a certified senior expert in Counterintelligence issues with extensive direct experience in the field. He is a senior expert in surveillance and surveillance detection issues.
He is an enrolled member of The Cherokee Nation, a Federally Recognized Tribe.
In the summer of 2017, Mr. Johnson founded the non-profit organization Americans for Intelligence Reform to create awareness for political corruption and diminished capabilities within the intelligence community.


brad johnson here for americans for
00:02
intelligence reform it is february
00:05
5th 2021 and uh particularly in the news
00:08
today is kind of what’s been going on
00:10
with
00:11
congresswoman from georgia uh marjorie
00:14
taylor
00:14
greene so congresswoman greene
00:18
got taken off all of her committees uh
00:22
in congress and
00:26
it was it was one of those things of
00:27
course the charge was led by the
00:28
democratic party
00:30
but the problem was it was also done by
00:32
the republican party
00:33
and there’s a number of things about
00:35
this whole thing that kind of
00:36
kind of bother me i mean some of the
00:38
stuff she has said
00:40
uh you know it’s hard to to say
00:43
some of it seems a little a little off
00:45
but some of it’s taken out of context
00:47
and some of it seems to me to be
00:49
kind of uh you know dead on worth worth
00:52
at least
00:52
looking at uh one of the things that
00:55
they they make a list
00:56
kind of of of the stuff that she’s being
00:59
accused of having done
01:00
one of them is the las vegas shooting
01:03
and
01:04
now what she’s saying in essence is
01:08
and and not succinctly you know she
01:10
doesn’t make her point very well
01:12
but what she’s saying is that this is
01:13
something that was taken advantage of
01:16
uh by the left to to uh
01:19
push for gun control and with that i
01:23
mean there’s i don’t think there’s any
01:24
mistake on that that the las vegas
01:26
shooting is most assuredly something
01:27
that’s done for that the shooter
01:29
was basically leftist in philosophy and
01:31
that’s all left alone
01:33
and you know so she has a valid point
01:35
there and one of the things she says is
01:36
she doubts very strongly that
01:38
this is something that he did alone
01:40
which now this is something i’ve done a
01:41
lot of talking about in interviews and
01:43
reporting on in the past
01:45
and there’s a lot of good information
01:47
out there
01:48
that that indicates at least a second
01:51
person and perhaps a group of people
01:53
supporting the effort
01:54
were out there and just one thing i i
01:57
always tend to go back to
01:58
is that that shooter in this in the las
02:01
vegas shooting
02:02
was locked into one room and in the
02:05
second room
02:06
the main room the main suite and a
02:08
second smaller room
02:09
had were connected by inner by
02:11
interconnecting doors
02:13
but that was locked from the small room
02:15
side so
02:16
he didn’t have access to that and in the
02:18
second room there was a second window
02:20
that had been broken out shots had been
02:22
fired into the crowd from that window
02:24
and what in the initial police report
02:27
there’s a picture of the beds that were
02:29
unused
02:30
and on that bed was a second pair of
02:31
gloves and that second pair of gloves
02:34
were all you know poofed up that hands
02:35
had been in it
02:36
and those hands it was just taken off uh
02:39
thrown down onto the bed
02:41
and the person left the gloves and and
02:43
went away
02:44
now when paddock was found his body was
02:46
found he had gloves on
02:47
so now i’m not suggesting that this is
02:50
absolute proof
02:52
but it is most assuredly evidence and
02:55
for example that second pair of gloves
02:57
that had clearly been used
02:59
in a room to which paddock had no access
03:02
that had and he couldn’t have locked it
03:04
from his side it had to be locked from
03:06
the other side
03:07
and where there was a second window
03:08
broken out where shooting had taken
03:09
place
03:10
i mean those are indicators that at
03:12
least a second person was evolved again
03:14
not suggesting that this is absolute
03:16
proof but it’s damning evidence and
03:19
certainly worthy of investigation
03:21
and it was not investigated so for
03:22
example the second pair of gloves no dna
03:24
was ever
03:25
tried to be taken off of that second
03:27
pair of gloves to see if they’d been
03:28
worn by
03:29
another person and who that other person
03:30
might be it’s because when paddock was
03:32
found dead they just
03:34
stopped the investigation so there’s a
03:36
lot of questions on that so i think
03:38
that’s a very reasonable thing for
03:39
green to have said and i i just don’t
03:43
find that that objectionable and yet
03:46
the republican party even the republican
03:48
party turned against her
03:49
for this stuff kind of one of the next
03:51
points to that that she’s so roundly
03:54
criticized for as her
03:55
her uh comments on congresswoman omar
03:58
and talib
04:00
both of which and and what they accuse
04:02
this congresswoman green of is making
04:04
anti-semitic remarks
04:06
based on some fire that was out in
04:09
california that you know supposedly she
04:11
said jews were involved with all of this
04:13
in order to build some sort of high
04:15
transit
04:16
high-speed transit or something like
04:17
that or a pipeline or something along
04:19
those lines
04:20
okay that’s a little goofy and there’s
04:22
they’re saying she talked about space
04:24
lasers so okay yeah that that is kind of
04:27
an oddball thing but
04:28
you know a democrat congressman also
04:32
from the state of georgia
04:34
uh johnson asked in a committee hearing
04:37
of
04:37
i think a three or four star general if
04:40
a marine if i recall correctly don’t
04:41
hold me to that part but ask the
04:43
question if
04:44
if you stack up all of those materials
04:46
in case of a
04:47
a big uh storm and we need all of those
04:50
materials for
04:51
support to the people who’ve had all
04:53
their homes and businesses destroyed
04:54
won’t that tip over the island you know
04:57
so i mean
04:58
that’s not more goofball than an island
05:00
tipping over based on the marine
05:02
stacking
05:02
a bunch of water crates and things like
05:04
that on one side of the island
05:06
so i mean it’s it’s an unfair uh
05:10
you know perspective on all of this they
05:13
don’t treat everyone fairly
05:14
they clearly have selected congresswoman
05:17
greene for special scrutiny led by the
05:19
democrats but
05:20
the the republicans as always they jump
05:22
in on this and attack one of their own
05:24
and as i said you know omar and talib
05:27
they’ve made
05:28
really very serious anti-semitic remarks
05:32
and certainly things far worse than
05:35
anything
05:36
congresswoman greene suggested she
05:38
wasn’t saying you know
05:39
anything about israel should be
05:41
destroyed and she doesn’t believe in the
05:42
holocaust or
05:43
any of those sorts of things like you
05:45
see out of omar and talib
05:47
she was basically saying that she
05:48
suspected this jewish guy
05:50
of being involved in starting a fire for
05:52
monetary gain
05:53
okay you know you that can certainly be
05:55
construed as anti-semitic but
05:57
it’s it it pales by comparison to what
06:00
other congress women have said
06:02
and you know she talked about hillary
06:04
clinton cutting off the face of a child
06:05
i mean that’s just
06:06
weird and kind of sick don’t i don’t
06:08
know what the heck that was all about
06:10
but that is a
06:11
a pretty dumb ass comment if that’s what
06:13
she really did indeed say
06:16
and she talked about 911 uh
06:20
you know as um
06:23
you know casting doubt on the airplane
06:26
that crashed into the pentagon which
06:27
again is goofball i mean
06:29
there’s plenty of photographs of the
06:32
aftermath of that aircraft having
06:34
run into the pentagon it’s not far from
06:36
where i’m at i watched part of the
06:38
repairs being
06:39
done uh you know in in driving by so
06:42
it’s not and it’s
06:43
from the road you can see really you’re
06:45
fairly close
06:46
on this one loop highway that goes right
06:49
past the pentagon
06:50
you can see really well where that
06:52
impact was and
06:53
the repairs as they were being built and
06:55
the repairman had a big american flag up
06:57
on it as they were doing the work and
06:58
things like that so i mean it’s
07:00
it’s clearly just not realistic to
07:02
suggest it didn’t take place if that was
07:04
is what she was uh what she was doing
07:07
uh and one of the other things i wanted
07:09
to mention you know so okay she’s coming
07:10
up with some goofball stuff and they say
07:12
she’s
07:12
she’s lying about all sorts of things
07:15
but
07:16
uh you know let’s not forget again as i
07:18
said this is a it’s
07:20
there’s a two-tiered justice sort of
07:22
thing
07:23
taking place in congress let’s remember
07:25
uh the
07:26
intelligence the head of the
07:27
intelligence committee for the democrats
07:29
was adam schiff
07:30
and during the uh during the trump years
07:32
when all of this was going on with the
07:34
first impeachment
07:35
thing that uh he kept coming out and
07:38
saying publicly
07:39
i saw proof i saw this video of this i
07:42
saw the documents of that
07:44
and and like every week or two weeks he
07:46
would come out and say i saw proof of
07:47
this i saw proof of this i felt proof of
07:48
this
07:49
we have this stuff it’s here i’ve seen
07:51
it and
07:52
every single time he did that over
07:54
months and months and months
07:56
those were all lies he knowingly lied he
07:59
knew he hadn’t seen it he knew it didn’t
08:01
exist
08:02
but he was coming out saying that he’d
08:04
seen the proof of this
08:06
none of which was in the mueller
08:07
investigation the mueller investigation
08:09
didn’t have
08:10
any of this stuff everybody went back
08:11
and looked for all of this stuff
08:13
which he said he’d been seeing out of
08:15
the mueller investigation
08:16
so you’ve got guys who who’s in a very
08:20
uh high position of responsibility
08:24
and and he lied you know certainly
08:27
weekly about this this level of proof on
08:30
something very important to the nation’s
08:31
business which is
08:32
the impeachment of the president and he
08:34
lied and misled the american people
08:36
just consistently and over a very long
08:39
period of time
08:40
and so what happens to him and that’s
08:42
nothing so again it’s this two-tiered
08:45
uh
08:48
judicial or justice system within
08:50
congress as to who they discipline and
08:52
who they don’t so this congresswoman
08:55
green
08:55
who yeah she’s come up with some kind of
08:57
goofy stuff but again
08:58
no more goofy than an island tipping
09:00
over and some stuff that could maybe be
09:02
construed as anti-semitic but
09:04
far less than what others have said and
09:07
if there’s any misleading is to the
09:09
american people
09:10
it’s far less than anything adam schiff
09:13
was saying at the time
09:14
so why really is she being disciplined
09:16
and i think it all boils down to what
09:18
we’re seeing
09:19
kind of across the united states now and
09:21
that she’s she was a trump supporter
09:24
and so outspoken and somebody that that
09:26
uh
09:27
is is that the democrats
09:31
all hate trump so they need to take her
09:33
out and you see this
09:34
majority within the republican party
09:37
that want to destroy all vestiges
09:39
of anything having to do with trump and
09:41
i think this woman’s a thorn in the side
09:43
so
09:43
all of these things are excuses to
09:45
remove her from her committee and of
09:46
course what they’re hoping to do
09:48
is damage her so badly in the state of
09:50
georgia that she cannot get reelected
09:53
so i would say you know it would be nice
09:56
to see congresswoman green
09:58
be getting some better advice out of
10:00
somebody i don’t know who’s around her
10:01
and
10:02
you know congress congressmen and women
10:04
they don’t you know they don’t have huge
10:06
budgets to hire
10:08
you know necessarily top-notch people
10:10
there’s usually only one or two people
10:11
on their staffs that are well paid and
10:13
everybody else is very low paid and
10:14
interns that work for free and all of
10:16
that
10:18
so it isn’t something where it’s easy
10:20
for them to surround themselves with
10:22
really
10:23
quality knowledgeable people that can
10:24
truly give them good advice
10:27
outside of the legislative arena they
10:29
have always have a pretty good person
10:30
there who’s almost always a lawyer
10:32
that can advise them on on those sorts
10:34
of issues legislative issues
10:36
but outside of that it’s hard for them
10:38
to have anybody around who’s really
10:39
helpful
10:40
now one thing i want to mention that is
10:43
not mentioned
10:43
anywhere in the press and by the fact
10:45
that it’s left out
10:47
is highly indicative of some of the
10:48
problems going on here
10:50
and that is one of her major criticisms
10:52
and uh
10:53
and one of the things that she was
10:54
hitting really hard all the time
10:57
was uh congressman swalwell
11:00
and she was saying that this guy is a
11:01
chinese spy
11:03
okay now coming out of this business uh
11:07
you know and and having a professional
11:09
opinion that you know somebody who knows
11:11
how this works and has done all of this
11:12
stuff
11:13
being able to opine on the issues is
11:16
something i wish she’d have
11:18
you know talked to somebody with that
11:19
sort of background like mine to be able
11:21
to
11:21
to to help her know what to say and not
11:23
to say but anyway that was one of the
11:25
things that she’s been highly critical
11:26
of now let’s look at the swalwell
11:28
case just to see i mean she has a
11:30
legitimate point which like i said
11:32
that’s left out of all of the reporting
11:34
they talk about all this other stuff she
11:36
said but where they went really nuts was
11:37
over the swalwell stuff
11:39
yet nobody reports it it’s the fact that
11:41
it’s left out
11:42
is highly indicative of how sensitive
11:44
democrats are
11:45
to the danger of this and what that what
11:48
that was is swalwell the
11:50
the information that’s out there is that
11:52
swalwell had this relationship with the
11:54
chinese spy this
11:56
woman that was sent to him a honeypot
11:58
would be one of the terms that we would
11:59
use for it
12:00
uh and this this that he was sleeping
12:03
with this girl
12:03
who was a chinese spy and that she was
12:07
funneling him uh money into his campaign
12:10
and that she had placed an intern on his
12:14
staff that she had picked
12:16
so presumably that intern was somebody
12:19
who is also reporting back to the
12:21
chinese what happened to that person we
12:23
don’t know because it was never
12:24
investigated so is that person even
12:26
still there
12:26
did that person move on to another staff
12:29
job we don’t know
12:30
now the origin of this information is
12:33
the fbi
12:34
because the fbi was were the people that
12:37
went to swalwell
12:38
and said hey this girl you’re sleeping
12:41
with who’s funneling money to your
12:42
campaign
12:43
who put an intern on your staff she’s a
12:46
chinese spy
12:47
so that’s the origin of it so it’s
12:49
unassailable
12:50
uh you know they wouldn’t have gone to
12:51
this guy if they weren’t completely sure
12:54
which is what they’re required to do and
12:55
just
12:56
as a side point that’s also what they
12:59
were required to do
13:00
if they thought somebody on president
13:02
trump’s campaign staff was a spy for the
13:04
russians
13:05
they were obligated to uh go to him and
13:08
tell him that they were worried that
13:10
this person on his staff was a spy for
13:11
the russians
13:12
but they did not do that what they did
13:14
was create this
13:15
fisa fiasco and all of that and target
13:17
trump which is all highly illegal and
13:19
you know we’ll see if anything comes out
13:21
of that investigation i have no
13:22
confidence
13:23
in department of justice i think it’s
13:24
going to be a whitewash but we’ll see
13:26
now but back to the swallow case that’s
13:28
one of the things that
13:29
that congresswoman greene was harping on
13:32
was this guy being a chinese spot
13:34
well like i said the information comes
13:36
from the fbi so she’s not making this up
13:38
out of the blue there are good reasons
13:40
to to suspect this
13:42
and now swalwell has been appointed to
13:45
head
13:46
this second impeachment of trump i mean
13:48
that’s just a travesty it’s just
13:50
bizarre now is he a spy for the chinese
13:54
you know don’t know uh but
13:58
look you know look at some of it would
14:00
if he were a spy for the chinese
14:03
would he willingly put somebody on his
14:05
staff who was
14:06
an intern who was he knowing knew was a
14:09
spy for the chinese well if he was
14:10
working for him yeah that would be part
14:12
of
14:12
what they would expect him to do that
14:14
would be part of what they were pushing
14:15
him to do
14:16
he’s on the intelligence oversight
14:18
committee so he’s somebody that would be
14:21
highly sought after by the chinese so he
14:23
would be a perfect target so would they
14:25
be after him
14:26
absolutely yes and we know 100 percent
14:29
for a fact that chinese were after him
14:31
to recruit him for a spy
14:33
because they ran this girl up against
14:35
him and they had instructed her to sleep
14:37
with him
14:38
and to start funneling money to him so
14:40
was he getting paid
14:41
was that money being funneled to his
14:43
campaign a form of payment to him from
14:45
the chinese
14:46
where he knew he was being paid off by
14:48
the chinese well we don’t know i mean
14:50
but certainly
14:52
that’s something you have to look at as
14:54
a possibility because
14:55
that’s what it would look like if he
14:58
were indeed working for the chinese
15:00
and i have one real question a burning
15:03
question in my mind
15:04
is the the day the fbi went to
15:07
congressman swalwell
15:08
and said to him hey that lady lady’s a
15:11
spy for the chinese
15:14
the next day she was gone all right who
15:17
told her
15:18
did congressman swalwell told tell her
15:20
it certainly looks that way
15:22
and if he were knowingly spying for the
15:24
chinese
15:25
that certainly would have been his
15:26
reaction so i would like to know from
15:28
congressman swalwell
15:30
did you tell this girl that the fbi came
15:33
to you
15:34
and warned you that she was a chinese
15:36
spy if
15:37
if you didn’t tell her who told her how
15:39
did she find out
15:41
within 24 hours she’s told the fbi come
15:43
to you and she’s out of the country
15:46
interesting question yet nobody’s asked
15:48
that as far as i know
15:49
the only only person to be pushing that
15:51
isn’t issues is i said americans for
15:53
intelligence reform
15:54
because it it just it’s one of those
15:56
issues where these things just get
15:58
keep going by and going by and going by
16:01
i’ve mentioned previously but
16:02
this is the same stuff that went on with
16:04
dianne feinstein senator from california
16:07
who had a spy chinese spy on her staff
16:09
for 20 years
16:10
one of the things i pushed from the very
16:12
beginning as soon as i heard of it is
16:14
how many people did that spy for the
16:16
chinese
16:17
put into the system where they went to
16:18
washington dc and worked for her
16:20
as interns or whoever or maybe a staff
16:23
position
16:24
and nobody’s ever asked any of those
16:26
questions it’s never investigated so we
16:28
never know
16:29
it shows this this two-tier justice
16:32
system
16:33
by the doj and fbi why aren’t they
16:35
investigating this stuff
16:36
i mean okay fine dianne feinstein may
16:39
not have known
16:41
but on the other hand according to her
16:44
financial reporting
16:45
uh her husband has made hundreds of
16:48
millions of dollars in doing business
16:50
with the chinese
16:51
that also could be a form of payment it
16:54
could be
16:55
i’m not suggesting she’s a spy for the
16:57
chinese but i am suggesting in both the
16:59
cases of dianne feinstein
17:01
and congressman swalwell if they were
17:04
spies for the chinese
17:06
this is part of how it would look and
17:08
these are the types of things they would
17:09
have these people doing
17:11
and that guy again as soon as she found
17:13
out
17:14
she fired this guide as far as we all
17:16
know he disappeared and went back to
17:17
china
17:18
so you know it’s it’s very odd all of
17:21
these things aren’t really being looked
17:22
at by anybody if we want to
17:24
have strong national security and strong
17:26
intelligence
17:27
system here in the united states of
17:29
america where we’re finding out what our
17:30
enemies are doing and make no mistake
17:32
chinese china is our enemy they’re our
17:34
greatest long-term strategic threat
17:36
absolutely bar none and they’re way
17:38
ahead of whoever’s in first second and
17:40
third place
17:41
uh you know or second third place after
17:43
them and
17:45
uh it yet these things are just being
17:47
allowed to pass and
17:49
certainly i mean the final point i’ll
17:50
make on this is this travesty
17:52
of justice again this this horrible
17:54
corruption that we’re seeing
17:56
where hunter biden in those emails
18:00
that were taken that were found off of
18:01
his laptop where
18:03
there’s discussion going on that appears
18:05
to be a 10 million dollar bribe coming
18:08
out of china
18:09
that he’s going to share with his dad
18:10
now president biden and his
18:12
uncle his dad’s brother and discussing
18:15
the split among them on this
18:17
now that looks pretty bad it hasn’t
18:20
nothing’s been done about it yet
18:21
it doesn’t look like anything’s going to
18:23
be done and part of the reason i say
18:25
nothing’s going to be done is because
18:27
hunter biden hired a lawyer from a firm
18:31
to represent him in this case and
18:34
president biden just appointed
18:36
another guy from that same firm to head
18:38
the department of justice criminal
18:39
division
18:40
so the guys investigating hunter biden
18:43
are is is the lawyer from the same
18:45
office that’s defending hunter biden so
18:48
uh it’s one of those things where that
18:50
does not stand up for the scrutiny
18:52
and yet we have congresswoman green
18:54
being
18:55
you know pretty severely punished and
18:57
embarrassed clearly with the hope of
18:58
driving her out of office
19:00
i hope that the people in georgia look
19:02
at all of this in in
19:03
as as a total and and say that they’ll
19:07
they’ll continue to provide some support
19:09
to congresswoman greene
19:10
although she’s getting bad advice i
19:12
would say on some things getting bad
19:14
information
19:15
and has been a little wacky on some
19:16
issues on some other issues she has some
19:18
really good points so as a whole she’s
19:21
probably doing more to help than to hurt
19:23
and i think like
19:24
i said i think she’s just being punished
19:26
mainly because she’s a trump supporter
19:28
so
19:29
an issue to keep our eye on and and
19:31
unfortunately i think with the
19:32
two-tiered justice system we suffer
19:34
under
19:34
in today’s united states of america
19:38
i suspect all this is going to go
19:39
unpunished but we
19:41
you know no reason not to fight back no
19:42
reason not to get the information out
19:44
there
19:44
all right thanks
20:04
[Music]
20:24
[Music]
20:26
you
Click here for entire transcript

5 thoughts on “An honest review of House Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene

  1. Marjorie Taylor Greene! Question, is she a ‘nut cake’? Let’s see. The supposed ‘outrageous’ things she has said, are ‘nutty’. Are they? Or, had she said the same things in a more thought out compelling manner, would they have been easier to the ear, more thought provoking, more credible? I think not!
    Going back, to just past the end of WWII, the Pacific Fleet Admiral, testified in open Congressional hearings in 1946 exclaimed, ‘the attack on Pearl Harbor, people in Washington, knew days if not weeks before December 7th that this attack would happen, but nobody told me’. Is that a ‘conspiracy theory’? No! What was the outcome of his making that statement? Moving on, John F. Kennedy assassinated in Dallas. Who, wanted him dead? Conspiracy theories abound, but, who really had the most to lose if he stayed alive? Question, JFK, indicated that he was NOT going to have us go to war in Viet Nam, even though, those most responsible for his winning election, stood the most to gain if we did go to war. Conspiracy theory?, not if you realize just how much money wasn’t goin to flow into the pockets of those he was indebted to. Oswald called himself a ‘patsy’, he told the truth! September 11th, Question, How, did a particle of ‘super thermite’ end up in a dust cloud that broke the windows of an apartment across from the towers when they collapsed? Was it just simply floating around in the atmosphere? Since it’s man made, I don’t think so. Of course, if the skeletal framework of the towers were coated in this material, it answers how and why they collapsed like a ‘controlled demolition’. Another ‘conspiracy theory’? Same event, yet miles away, the Pentagon Before the walls collapsed, a 16 foot hole was capable of swallowing a commercial jet liner, with the most obvious piece of evidence, on the lawn, a jet engine rotor, too small for the engines on the liner itself, and, denounced by the engine manufacturers as being ‘something’ that would have been installed on that aircraft. Every time any one raises anything that goes against the chosen ‘narrative’ it’s a ‘conspiracy theory’, just like the ‘election fraud’.
    So, is Marjorie a ‘nut cake’? It doesn’t matter, because no matter what she did or didn’t say, if it didn’t fit, she would always be wrong. I suspect that her rantings were an effect of what we are all suffering from. The ‘story tellers’ have the weakest minded of what are supposed to be intelligent people, who are so mentally frozen, they allow the narratives to live and prosper, truth be damned! Nature, in all of it’s perfection on what it does, knows when the weak, the sickly, the handicapped and ,whatever are not meant to survive and takes it’s course.
    Maybe, we’re next, and maybe, we’ve been long overdo! In Nature, stupidity gets you killed.

  2. Mr. Johnson – Your comments about Greene’s comments on the supposed plane that crashed into the Pentagon, are tragically flawed. There is plenty of video and photographic evidence that it was not a plane that crashed into the Pentagon. The damage pattern on the front of the building does NOT support where the wings of a plane would have done damage away from the main bore hole. I am amazed that you are not aware of this evidence and did not mention it or consider it. There are professional architectural organizations who have cast public doubt on the official plane theory and on the official twin towers collapse report. And just because Greene says a certain person is Jewish, does not mean she is antisemitic. You are one of the good guys, and I would strongly recommend that you contact Greene and be an outside adviser to her. She is an asset for the good guys/girls, you and “us.” She needs someone like you to inform her of some of the pitfalls and also the positive things she can be doing for our country and for our Constitution.

    1. If in actual fact, commercial airliners were NOT involved in these attacks, where did the planes/passengers go that day? Where did they disappear to? I have been wondering and trying to find out about this for years, basically ever since.

  3. If the fbi/doj informed an elected official that someone on their staff was a Chinese spy, they have two options: 1) let her/him remain there and secretly monitor her/his communications and contacts to find out the extent of the damage she/he has caused, or 2) arrest her/him and prosecute her/him for spying. Instead they let her/him go free as a bird, back to China to spill all the secrets they knew. It sounds like several people in our government have aided and abetted her/his escape, which makes them an accessory to their spying. Our country is so corrupt, there is zero hope of it ever being restored to any semblance of normalcy.

  4. Rep. Greene is allowed to believe in “QAnon” if she chooses. You democraps believe in NWO Fantasy right? You believe you are Gods right?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial