Strong and probably credible rumors say U.S. Attorney Durham is getting very close to issuing indictments for John Brennan and others. Should it be proven that he used the powers of our government to unseat a duly elected president, treason/sedition can be charged. Brad Johnson, retired Senior CIA Officer and President of Americans for Intelligence Reform, explains why this is heating up. Others, including Comey, Clapper and Strzok and perhaps more, could very well be in the cross hairs. Will there now be justice? If so, it will be a major victory for the good guys.
https://youtu.be/z4e9DUKQyhc
[expander_maker id=”8″ more=”Click here for entire transcript” less=”Read less”]
Brad Johnson it is April 29 and there
00:05
has been ongoing investigations into
00:08
what I recall were really illegal use of
00:12
the FISA courts in terms of surveillance
00:15
of candidates has there is there any
00:20
kind of advance but on that are we gonna
00:21
finally see something that looks like
00:23
justice to those that are paying
00:24
attention I think so and this is
00:26
something we’ve long talked about since
00:29
this originally happened so ever over
00:32
the last I don’t know two and a half
00:33
years or so you and I have discussed
00:35
this off and on and had a number of
00:37
updates as this process has has just you
00:40
know walked down the path that it’s
00:42
going and it is now at a very very very
00:46
interesting stage one of the things I
00:48
mentioned last time we did an update on
00:50
this was how the investigation is headed
00:55
by a Turney US Attorney John Durham has
00:59
gone to the CIA and said give us all
01:04
your communications documents related to
01:06
John Brennan I believe during a certain
01:08
period of time so this was this was all
01:10
made public now out of that there’s a
01:13
few things that you can take to the bank
01:15
one is that for that to happen he’s
01:20
going to be indicted and really there’s
01:23
there’s this there’s really only one way
01:25
that this is that this is can unfold in
01:28
my opinion and that is going to be on
01:30
some charge related to treason trying to
01:35
sedition or you know overthrow the
01:38
government or just straight treason or
01:40
you know the the specifics of the
01:43
charges you know aren’t something that
01:46
you know I don’t really know what they
01:47
have in mind in that way but there’s a
01:49
lot of rumors coming out now a lot of
01:51
bits and pieces of information that this
01:53
is now culminating and coming right to
01:56
the end which also to go public with the
01:59
fact that they’re asking for this
02:00
information out of the CIA on John
02:02
Brennan former CIA director John Brennan
02:05
that’s a clear indicator that there at
02:07
the very end of this so I would say now
02:10
that the that some charges if
02:13
a whole bunch of charges are imminently
02:15
pending I think it’s clear that if
02:18
Brennan’s going down that James Comey
02:22
Jim clapper Peter struck all that all
02:27
that group of people that were involved
02:29
in this whole FISA at you know the
02:34
fiasco is the kind of the term I’ve been
02:36
calling it but just how this faisal was
02:39
taint obtained it legally and renewed
02:41
three different times both targeting
02:43
candidate Trump of an opposition
02:45
political party and then later President
02:48
Trump once you start to use the offices
02:51
of the US government and the powers and
02:53
authorities of the US government trying
02:56
to take out a legally elected US
02:58
president you’ve crossed the line now
03:02
one of the things I mentioned early on
03:04
was the fact that the day after the
03:07
Moller investigation ended US Attorney
03:10
General Barr reinstated the federal
03:12
death penalty so if we’ve got people
03:14
facing treason which i think is
03:18
conclusively the case at this point and
03:20
john brennan is number one on the list
03:23
and as i’ve said many many many times
03:25
all roads lead to john brennan so he’s
03:27
at the center of this he will probably
03:29
be the most highly indicted that’s
03:34
probably not the correct term but more
03:36
indictments of a more serious nature
03:39
will be centered on john brennan than
03:42
anyone else there may be some people
03:43
close to or equal to him but i don’t
03:46
think anyone will exceed him in overall
03:50
indictments coming out against him so
03:52
now it looks like what everybody’s
03:57
saying is it basically it stops there if
03:59
it goes beyond that that’ll be
04:00
interesting to see nobody’s saying that
04:02
this goes to the former White House the
04:05
administration – personally I should say
04:08
to former President Barack Obama but it
04:12
sort of depends on what these guys do
04:14
now if these things come out all of
04:17
these guys not so it’s John Brennan but
04:19
all of the rest of the guys particularly
04:21
James Comey and Peter struck and those
04:24
guys understand prosecution and
04:27
negotiations on these deals they
04:28
understand that stuff really well so all
04:31
of them are going to negotiate they’re
04:34
going to plea deal make a plea deal on
04:37
these and these charges now and of
04:39
course they have to at least anyone
04:41
who’s in that group that was actually
04:44
involved in attempting to overthrow the
04:47
government unseat the president the
04:49
United States legally after being
04:50
legally elected anyone that falls into
04:52
that category you know they’re gonna set
04:55
on the table look you know with if we go
04:58
after you on this this sort of
04:59
treasonous you know can be punished by
05:01
the death penalty we can go after the
05:03
death penalty in the prosecution if you
05:05
want to go to trial you know you pays
05:07
your quarter your takes your chance none
05:10
of those guys have the balls
05:11
none of them not even Lisa Paige – to
05:15
risk that none of them are gonna do it
05:17
so all of them are gonna go to jail and
05:19
I think what we’re gonna see is a group
05:23
of people within the CIA now it looks
05:25
like at this point and now this part is
05:29
highly speculative on my part and you
05:32
know don’t have any direct information
05:33
there’s no rumors to this effect but I
05:36
would be very surprised if this doesn’t
05:38
taint at the very least the current CIA
05:42
director Gina Haskell that remains to be
05:46
seen as I said highly speculative I
05:47
don’t have that inside information but
05:49
there are elements to lead up to that
05:51
there is information out in the public
05:53
arena that long ago she lawyered up so I
05:56
think that’s I think that’s what we’re
05:58
gonna see what were you gonna say see
06:00
what she was a nevertrump er right I
06:03
think that well never Trump er would be
06:06
to me you imply that basically she’s a
06:08
Republican who is sort of a Rhino type
06:11
Republican or someone along those lines
06:12
who didn’t believe in Trump Sheena
06:14
Haskell was never that now she wasn’t
06:16
openly political but no she’s closely
06:18
tied to John Brennan so I wouldn’t
06:20
categorize her as never Trump or I would
06:22
categorize hers extreme leftist and
06:26
along the same lines as John Brennan so
06:28
those people don’t fall into the never
06:30
Trump for category as I define it but I
06:33
you know I wouldn’t argue the point if
06:34
you were to insist that she be called a
06:36
never Trump or because certainly I think
06:38
she hates Trump you know
06:40
as much as she can hate anyone and
06:43
certainly she’s going to do anything she
06:45
can to do him in and I think that part
06:48
of what she did was was I think there’s
06:50
past cooperation with her and and John
06:52
Brennan so I think she’s going to be in
06:54
trouble I think there’ll be another
06:56
handful of people around the CIA another
06:58
you know group a similar size to group
07:00
at the FBI and a similar size group at
07:03
the DOJ Department of Justice so I don’t
07:08
know but I would say you know the the
07:11
the former people the the say a handful
07:13
of people at each of those organizations
07:15
maybe a few more at the FBI is how this
07:19
seems to be all shaping up so call it
07:21
three or four five at the CIA DOJ three
07:26
four maybe and at the FBI six to eight
07:30
something like that those are my guesses
07:32
you know can’t really speculate on what
07:35
I have on names but everybody’s heard
07:37
the same names in the news and I think
07:40
all of those people are and of course
07:42
various charges they’re not all going to
07:44
be charged with the same stuff though
07:45
there’ll be some overlap and differences
07:47
and lesser charges and greater charges
07:49
and all that sort of stuff but I think
07:50
we’re going to see this again this is
07:53
highly speculative because I don’t know
07:54
but I think that they’re you know these
07:57
these indictments may already exist they
08:01
may not they may be in process but I
08:03
think we’re at that stage which to me
08:05
you know 30 days out were in at the
08:09
almost to the 1st of May so I would
08:13
wouldn’t be surprised if by the end of
08:15
May that we start to see some of these
08:16
things come out but I would say
08:18
certainly by June so fairly fairly near
08:21
future I think we’re gonna see some of
08:22
these things hit very sudden but that I
08:25
know there’s a lot of people have been
08:27
paying attention for the last four or
08:28
five or six years and urgently feel that
08:31
to have their sense of law and equality
08:35
before the law and democracy restored
08:38
that some of these people have to be
08:40
exposed I agree with that completely and
08:43
I think we the people are gonna win this
08:45
time I think I think this is going to be
08:47
a big victory for the good guys
08:54
[Music]
[expander_maker id=”5″ more=”Read more” less=”
Brad Johnson it is April 29 and there
00:05
has been ongoing investigations into
00:08
what I recall were really illegal use of
00:12
the FISA courts in terms of surveillance
00:15
of candidates has there is there any
00:20
kind of advance but on that are we gonna
00:21
finally see something that looks like
00:23
justice to those that are paying
00:24
attention I think so and this is
00:26
something we’ve long talked about since
00:29
this originally happened so ever over
00:32
the last I don’t know two and a half
00:33
years or so you and I have discussed
00:35
this off and on and had a number of
00:37
updates as this process has has just you
00:40
know walked down the path that it’s
00:42
going and it is now at a very very very
00:46
interesting stage one of the things I
00:48
mentioned last time we did an update on
00:50
this was how the investigation is headed
00:55
by a Turney US Attorney John Durham has
00:59
gone to the CIA and said give us all
01:04
your communications documents related to
01:06
John Brennan I believe during a certain
01:08
period of time so this was this was all
01:10
made public now out of that there’s a
01:13
few things that you can take to the bank
01:15
one is that for that to happen he’s
01:20
going to be indicted and really there’s
01:23
there’s this there’s really only one way
01:25
that this is that this is can unfold in
01:28
my opinion and that is going to be on
01:30
some charge related to treason trying to
01:35
sedition or you know overthrow the
01:38
government or just straight treason or
01:40
you know the the specifics of the
01:43
charges you know aren’t something that
01:46
you know I don’t really know what they
01:47
have in mind in that way but there’s a
01:49
lot of rumors coming out now a lot of
01:51
bits and pieces of information that this
01:53
is now culminating and coming right to
01:56
the end which also to go public with the
01:59
fact that they’re asking for this
02:00
information out of the CIA on John
02:02
Brennan former CIA director John Brennan
02:05
that’s a clear indicator that there at
02:07
the very end of this so I would say now
02:10
that the that some charges if
02:13
a whole bunch of charges are imminently
02:15
pending I think it’s clear that if
02:18
Brennan’s going down that James Comey
02:22
Jim clapper Peter struck all that all
02:27
that group of people that were involved
02:29
in this whole FISA at you know the
02:34
fiasco is the kind of the term I’ve been
02:36
calling it but just how this faisal was
02:39
taint obtained it legally and renewed
02:41
three different times both targeting
02:43
candidate Trump of an opposition
02:45
political party and then later President
02:48
Trump once you start to use the offices
02:51
of the US government and the powers and
02:53
authorities of the US government trying
02:56
to take out a legally elected US
02:58
president you’ve crossed the line now
03:02
one of the things I mentioned early on
03:04
was the fact that the day after the
03:07
Moller investigation ended US Attorney
03:10
General Barr reinstated the federal
03:12
death penalty so if we’ve got people
03:14
facing treason which i think is
03:18
conclusively the case at this point and
03:20
john brennan is number one on the list
03:23
and as i’ve said many many many times
03:25
all roads lead to john brennan so he’s
03:27
at the center of this he will probably
03:29
be the most highly indicted that’s
03:34
probably not the correct term but more
03:36
indictments of a more serious nature
03:39
will be centered on john brennan than
03:42
anyone else there may be some people
03:43
close to or equal to him but i don’t
03:46
think anyone will exceed him in overall
03:50
indictments coming out against him so
03:52
now it looks like what everybody’s
03:57
saying is it basically it stops there if
03:59
it goes beyond that that’ll be
04:00
interesting to see nobody’s saying that
04:02
this goes to the former White House the
04:05
administration – personally I should say
04:08
to former President Barack Obama but it
04:12
sort of depends on what these guys do
04:14
now if these things come out all of
04:17
these guys not so it’s John Brennan but
04:19
all of the rest of the guys particularly
04:21
James Comey and Peter struck and those
04:24
guys understand prosecution and
04:27
negotiations on these deals they
04:28
understand that stuff really well so all
04:31
of them are going to negotiate they’re
04:34
going to plea deal make a plea deal on
04:37
these and these charges now and of
04:39
course they have to at least anyone
04:41
who’s in that group that was actually
04:44
involved in attempting to overthrow the
04:47
government unseat the president the
04:49
United States legally after being
04:50
legally elected anyone that falls into
04:52
that category you know they’re gonna set
04:55
on the table look you know with if we go
04:58
after you on this this sort of
04:59
treasonous you know can be punished by
05:01
the death penalty we can go after the
05:03
death penalty in the prosecution if you
05:05
want to go to trial you know you pays
05:07
your quarter your takes your chance none
05:10
of those guys have the balls
05:11
none of them not even Lisa Paige – to
05:15
risk that none of them are gonna do it
05:17
so all of them are gonna go to jail and
05:19
I think what we’re gonna see is a group
05:23
of people within the CIA now it looks
05:25
like at this point and now this part is
05:29
highly speculative on my part and you
05:32
know don’t have any direct information
05:33
there’s no rumors to this effect but I
05:36
would be very surprised if this doesn’t
05:38
taint at the very least the current CIA
05:42
director Gina Haskell that remains to be
05:46
seen as I said highly speculative I
05:47
don’t have that inside information but
05:49
there are elements to lead up to that
05:51
there is information out in the public
05:53
arena that long ago she lawyered up so I
05:56
think that’s I think that’s what we’re
05:58
gonna see what were you gonna say see
06:00
what she was a nevertrump er right I
06:03
think that well never Trump er would be
06:06
to me you imply that basically she’s a
06:08
Republican who is sort of a Rhino type
06:11
Republican or someone along those lines
06:12
who didn’t believe in Trump Sheena
06:14
Haskell was never that now she wasn’t
06:16
openly political but no she’s closely
06:18
tied to John Brennan so I wouldn’t
06:20
categorize her as never Trump or I would
06:22
categorize hers extreme leftist and
06:26
along the same lines as John Brennan so
06:28
those people don’t fall into the never
06:30
Trump for category as I define it but I
06:33
you know I wouldn’t argue the point if
06:34
you were to insist that she be called a
06:36
never Trump or because certainly I think
06:38
she hates Trump you know
06:40
as much as she can hate anyone and
06:43
certainly she’s going to do anything she
06:45
can to do him in and I think that part
06:48
of what she did was was I think there’s
06:50
past cooperation with her and and John
06:52
Brennan so I think she’s going to be in
06:54
trouble I think there’ll be another
06:56
handful of people around the CIA another
06:58
you know group a similar size to group
07:00
at the FBI and a similar size group at
07:03
the DOJ Department of Justice so I don’t
07:08
know but I would say you know the the
07:11
the former people the the say a handful
07:13
of people at each of those organizations
07:15
maybe a few more at the FBI is how this
07:19
seems to be all shaping up so call it
07:21
three or four five at the CIA DOJ three
07:26
four maybe and at the FBI six to eight
07:30
something like that those are my guesses
07:32
you know can’t really speculate on what
07:35
I have on names but everybody’s heard
07:37
the same names in the news and I think
07:40
all of those people are and of course
07:42
various charges they’re not all going to
07:44
be charged with the same stuff though
07:45
there’ll be some overlap and differences
07:47
and lesser charges and greater charges
07:49
and all that sort of stuff but I think
07:50
we’re going to see this again this is
07:53
highly speculative because I don’t know
07:54
but I think that they’re you know these
07:57
these indictments may already exist they
08:01
may not they may be in process but I
08:03
think we’re at that stage which to me
08:05
you know 30 days out were in at the
08:09
almost to the 1st of May so I would
08:13
wouldn’t be surprised if by the end of
08:15
May that we start to see some of these
08:16
things come out but I would say
08:18
certainly by June so fairly fairly near
08:21
future I think we’re gonna see some of
08:22
these things hit very sudden but that I
08:25
know there’s a lot of people have been
08:27
paying attention for the last four or
08:28
five or six years and urgently feel that
08:31
to have their sense of law and equality
08:35
before the law and democracy restored
08:38
that some of these people have to be
08:40
exposed I agree with that completely and
08:43
I think we the people are gonna win this
08:45
time I think I think this is going to be
08:47
a big victory for the good guys
08:54
[Music]
[/expander_maker]
