A reporter in Italy claims evidence that the seat of the US Presidential election fraud is found in the US Embassy of Rome. Is that true? Could the expose finally lead to the truth about fraud? Time is almost up and beyond is uncharted waters. Brad Johnson, retired CIA Senior Operative and Chief of Station, describes what he has learned from his own sources. Brad is now President of Americans for Intelligence Reform.
[expander_maker id=”8″ more=”Click for entire transcript” less=”Read less”]
oh boy brad johnson it is now december
00:03
the 5th
00:04
the clock is running out the election is
00:07
way into overtime it’s uh clearly look
00:10
i’m not big on sports
00:12
but i’m big on sports analogies this
00:14
looks like a sudden death situation
00:16
in terms of the election and uh at the
00:19
moment the way it looks to me is
00:21
that a staggering amount of evidence
00:24
that there was fraud
00:25
gets heaped upon the established state
00:29
machinery who then grudgingly admit
00:32
there may be a problem
00:33
and then do some kind of verification
00:36
that isn’t verification and dismiss it
00:39
so tell me is there something that i’m
00:41
missing that we’re all missing out of
00:42
this
00:44
well i put it this way i think yes
00:47
there’s some new stuff that’s just now
00:49
hitting
00:50
but to kind of put some context to the
00:53
situation you’re describing
00:55
the problem with the support of the
00:57
tactic that’s been used up to now
00:59
by giuliani and sydney powell and and
01:02
what they’re up to
01:04
is it’s very uh piecemeal
01:07
and the solution for these sorts of
01:10
cases
01:11
doesn’t provide a victory for president
01:14
trump
01:14
so for example they proved that
01:19
observers were forced out of the room
01:22
and
01:22
so counting took place without their
01:24
observations and things like that
01:27
unless you can prove the underlying
01:31
problem of organized fraud which these
01:34
cases that they’re putting forward
01:35
aren’t organized to do
01:38
then it doesn’t do you really any good
01:39
because what’s the judge going to do
01:41
with that a judge is going to look at it
01:42
and say okay
01:43
no observers and excuse me no observers
01:46
in the room
01:48
so all right you know twenty thousand
01:50
dollar fine
01:51
democratic party for kicking them all
01:52
out and enforcing this and
01:54
don’t ever do it again and implement
01:56
measures to make sure it doesn’t happen
01:57
again
01:58
nothing whatsoever to do with the
01:59
election what that is about
02:01
are the procedures related to elections
02:04
in general so that’s kind of the
02:06
underlying problem
02:08
so that then goes to what is the larger
02:11
the larger
02:11
issue is that what they have to do from
02:14
the trump side
02:16
is show organized attempted fraud
02:19
and so the problem that’s been out there
02:22
is
02:22
where was all this done and organized
02:24
and now
02:26
if you know anyone basically looking at
02:28
the numbers where you see these
02:30
the two lines going up and then suddenly
02:32
a spike that puts
02:33
biden up ahead of trump and then they
02:35
both go on and biden wins and stuff
02:37
i mean we all know that that’s bogus so
02:40
any
02:41
like honest thinking person looking at
02:43
the numbers
02:44
knows that there was stuff wrong with
02:46
this election so just based on that
02:48
working
02:48
backwards one of the things is it
02:52
appears
02:52
that the democrats had been planning
02:54
this for at least two years since the
02:56
2018 election so they have a long time
02:58
to prepare for it
03:00
so just give me that if you will and go
03:03
forward based
03:04
on that assumption and what the problem
03:06
is that
03:07
it faces the trump team is figuring out
03:10
how
03:10
what was done so that you can cry foul
03:14
and say that this was an organized
03:16
effort
03:17
to fraud the american people of the vote
03:20
and and conduct a fraudulent election
03:24
that was
03:24
uh fixed right fixed for the biden vote
03:27
and
03:28
so that’s been the problem now out of
03:30
that what we’ve seen is kind of some
03:31
thrashing around
03:33
and there’s been a lot of reports about
03:35
you know spain
03:36
being involved some mentions of prague
03:40
this raid in germany now that raid in
03:42
germany i want to mention
03:44
i’ve i mentioned it in a previous report
03:46
and kind of took it at face value
03:49
uh but now i’ve had a chance to kind of
03:51
look and dig into a little bit and ask
03:53
around and things like that
03:55
and it looks like that thing is
03:57
completely bogus altogether that there
03:58
was no raid
04:00
and i’ve been i’ve gotten a lot of
04:01
questions about
04:03
about that specifically because what the
04:06
rumor is out there
04:07
is essentially that this was a cia
04:09
facility
04:10
that the us army raided in order to
04:13
confiscate
04:14
servers that were suspected of being
04:17
involved
04:18
in this in the fraudulent election so
04:21
that’s kind of the core of the rumor
04:24
spun off from that there’s a lot of
04:26
things that
04:27
that cia director gina haspel
04:31
was there in germany at directing this
04:35
fraud and that the she had brought in
04:38
some uh you know guys from the agency
04:41
with military background that knew how
04:42
to
04:43
uh you know and the term we always used
04:45
in the agency was knuckle draggers that
04:47
that and it wasn’t really a disparaging
04:49
comment but
04:50
uh that she brought in some of the
04:52
knuckle drivers from the agency that
04:53
were all former military that knew how
04:54
to
04:55
you know tote weapons and use them if
04:57
required
04:58
so she had those guys there as her
05:00
little private army when the u.s
05:02
troops went in they got into some sort
05:04
of shootout
05:05
and that there were people killed and
05:06
you see this retired three-star general
05:09
mcinerney or i might be mispronouncing
05:11
his name but i think it’s mcinerney
05:13
who’s been saying that this took place
05:15
and there was a shootout and all that i
05:16
mean that’s all goofball
05:18
you know one of the things you just you
05:20
wouldn’t see even
05:22
retired military guys that were out and
05:24
working for the cia and say a
05:27
special operations group type activity
05:29
where they were doing implementing
05:31
military type
05:32
activities uh you’re not going to see
05:34
those guys open
05:35
fire on uniformed u.s troops which those
05:38
guys to carry weapons and go in would
05:39
have had to have been in
05:40
yes uniform they’re just they’re both
05:42
military they wouldn’t have shot at each
05:43
other
05:44
naturally like that so it’s just
05:47
everything about it was unlikely so
05:49
it was one of those things i was going
05:51
around and asking around and all that
05:53
but i think what it is is that all the
05:55
people saying that
05:57
are providing a smoke screen and what
05:59
they’re trying to do is cover up the
06:01
truth of when what really happened and
06:03
so all this stuff about
06:05
gina haspel was there that she was
06:07
wounded she was
06:08
killed you know she was found dead in
06:10
her home all these weird rumors
06:12
that that are out there about gina
06:14
haspel and germany and
06:16
the raid and all that all that stuff is
06:18
nonsense it’s all smoke screen none of
06:20
it
06:20
is true and the people pushing that
06:23
are pushing it to provide cover for the
06:26
fraudulent elections they’re on the side
06:28
of
06:29
biten trying to help biden by providing
06:32
the smoke screen now
06:33
what’s interesting that’s happened next
06:35
it’s new
06:36
is there’s a reporter in italy this is
06:38
coming out in italy
06:40
called uh danielle capazoni so if i
06:43
pronounce that wrong forgive me
06:44
i i i’m not 100 sure the pronunciation
06:47
but cappuzoni
06:49
he’s doing television reporting on a
06:50
channel called r-e-t-e-4
06:52
in italy and also writes for a newspaper
06:55
that i think that’s la verita which
06:57
would be the truth
06:58
uh again not 100 sure of the
07:00
pronunciation of the name i might be off
07:03
so he’s been writing this stuff and
07:06
there’s been
07:07
you know how italy is with this sort of
07:08
stuff it it’s an interesting dynamic
07:11
with the within the italian culture and
07:13
this is part of what’s come out there
07:15
so what he’s reported and has broke this
07:18
story
07:19
it’s also now breaking in france but it
07:22
hasn’t come to the united states or
07:23
canada or the west
07:26
i mean you know the us and canada at
07:27
least but it is breaking in western
07:30
europe
07:30
it’s starting to grow there so it’s it
07:32
it’s going to hit here and that’s the
07:34
clue
07:35
he’s saying that he’s got people
07:38
within the government that were uh
07:41
watching all of this
07:43
and uh are aware that
07:46
the whole thing was actually
07:47
masterminded out of italy
07:50
and that’s where the center of it took
07:51
place now this fits the data points that
07:54
are out there if you look at it as i
07:56
described
07:56
if you look at all that german raid and
07:58
prague and spain
08:00
as smokescreen this makes perfect sense
08:03
and
08:04
fits because the problem that the trump
08:06
team has had
08:07
and the reason u.s attorney general
08:08
barrow has said you know
08:10
no proof of fraud is because they didn’t
08:12
have that framework of how the whole
08:14
thing worked
08:15
here it is now the question is uh is it
08:18
too late
08:19
but and a lot of the details are going
08:20
to follow and i’m telling you right now
08:23
a lot of details are going to follow
08:25
over the next two weeks on this as it
08:26
unfolds
08:27
so but just the basic scenario that’s
08:30
been outlined
08:31
out of italian reporting and out of
08:34
french reporting
08:35
and as i said this fits the data points
08:37
that we do have
08:39
is that and what this part is from italy
08:43
that this thing was essentially
08:45
masterminded not masterminded
08:47
it it was uh
08:50
headed up by an individual who was a u.s
08:54
foreign service officer posted
08:57
to the embassy in rome and that
09:02
he was the one there that was the biden
09:04
man
09:05
watching this whole thing from afar
09:08
setting it up
09:09
to um to be able to
09:13
use these dominion counting machines to
09:16
manipulate the vote
09:17
and that these as there’s been a lot of
09:18
reporting on the fact that these are all
09:20
hooked up to the internet which is true
09:22
the problem is like i said what was
09:23
missing is that center
09:25
where the manipulation took place so
09:28
what happened is and
09:30
again this pretty straightforward stuff
09:32
with these machines
09:33
the counting went so far they saw that
09:36
trump’s numbers were enormous
09:38
they didn’t have anything in place to
09:41
uh to change the algorithms so that that
09:45
that biden would win based on this was
09:47
turning out how it’s turning out because
09:49
the
09:50
biden numbers were crappy and the trump
09:51
numbers were just off the chart
09:54
so that’s why they shut down the votes
09:55
in these five or six states
09:57
and that all had to be the the button
10:00
was pushed if you will the order was
10:02
given
10:02
they stopped it all and then they re-ran
10:05
all of the numbers and came up with the
10:06
algorithms that make that would make the
10:08
vote turn out right
10:10
in these states that would swing it to
10:11
biden and that that order was given
10:14
and it was run actually out of rome
10:17
into the u.s embassy in rome and there
10:20
is a very large
10:23
again this is the reporting out of italy
10:24
there’s a very large company which this
10:26
is true
10:27
called leonardo leonardo is a big cyber
10:30
security
10:32
uh government military contracting
10:34
company
10:35
they’re enormous now uh they’re not
10:37
super well known here in the united
10:38
states but they also exist here in the
10:40
united states they have a
10:42
an american subsidiary here
10:45
and they do huge contracts all of it
10:47
back to the government
10:49
so supposedly the the the embassy in
10:52
room
10:53
was the center the the center of the
10:56
effort going on of the
10:57
data manipulation and that
11:01
this was done uh through this
11:05
company leonardo and what they had used
11:07
and the reason it’s been so hard to
11:08
track
11:09
is because they were using encrypted
11:11
military satellite
11:13
for the link so they
11:16
the embassy made the calls they were
11:18
connected in through this company
11:20
leonardo
11:21
the linkage was through encrypted
11:23
military satellite
11:24
to cover it right so it couldn’t be
11:26
found or at least couldn’t be found very
11:28
easily
11:29
and then from there that was how they
11:31
connected into these
11:33
data counting machines that were here in
11:35
the united states
11:36
hooked up to the internet so that was
11:38
the scenario of how this was done
11:40
and if you look at like i said the holes
11:43
that are
11:44
there and all of that it fits so all of
11:47
this makes perfect sense i think we’re
11:49
finally kind of hitting on the truth and
11:52
i hope this comes to the attention of
11:53
the white house immediately
11:55
and then all the people there um and
11:58
uh they start to focus in on this and
12:00
take a look because
12:02
like i say that it all just matches up
12:04
it’s one of those things of occam’s
12:06
razor where
12:07
you know there is no explanation that
12:08
fits all the data except this one
12:11
and it it just matches beautifully with
12:14
it so
12:15
uh you know i that’s that’s the basic
12:18
scenario as it’s begun
12:20
and a little background on this uh a
12:23
couple
12:24
of things now what they’re reporting to
12:26
is that the cia was directly involved
12:30
and that there are individuals from the
12:32
cia
12:33
that came to help this process and that
12:35
were the
12:36
technical support of you if you will and
12:39
uh part of the reason that this has come
12:41
out was because
12:44
previously under the obama
12:46
administration
12:47
some stuff had been done to really snub
12:51
and piss off the italians and one of the
12:54
examples that was given to me by
12:55
somebody who’s
12:57
who’s there uh is that
13:00
during the obama years i i most people
13:03
don’t know this i mean as i’ve talked
13:05
about i mean i’ve lived overseas and
13:06
worked in and out of embassies for
13:08
decades so something i’m very familiar
13:09
with the fourth of july is always a big
13:11
party
13:12
a big celebration overseas at the
13:14
embassy it’s basically working for
13:16
us but it’s a celebration for the local
13:18
country the host country
13:20
and and we invite them into the embassy
13:22
and it’s
13:23
and try to get all of like the american
13:25
companies that are in that country to
13:27
come
13:28
and you know set up booths or contribute
13:31
something and
13:32
like mcdonald’s for example they’re
13:34
always a pretty big supporter overseas
13:36
and we bring in you know cheeseburgers
13:38
and fries and the little apple pies and
13:41
stuff like that
13:41
for all the guests and uh it you know it
13:44
may not seem like much
13:45
like to the public listening to this but
13:47
overseas those things are a nice touch
13:50
and a lot of the leadership from every
13:52
host country will come
13:53
and senior leadership you know the
13:55
presidents will come ambassadors will
13:57
invite them and
13:58
all up and down the spectrum and it’s as
13:59
i say working event for the
14:01
for the us embassy but a big one so uh
14:04
under
14:05
under obama for example one of the snubs
14:07
was they didn’t have the fourth of july
14:09
celebration
14:10
well that’s something that goes on
14:11
worldwide everywhere so the italians are
14:13
looking at this and going you know
14:15
whiskey tango foxtrot why you know why
14:17
are we being snubbed
14:19
this is going on everywhere else in the
14:21
world so what’s
14:22
what’s the deal so that kind of set the
14:25
tone
14:26
that pissed off the italians at the
14:29
obama administration
14:30
and then they’re looking at this whole
14:32
thing unfold
14:34
from the last couple of years seeing
14:37
some unusual activity by the cia
14:40
by the embassy uh these these uh the
14:43
leonardo
14:44
company and they’re looking at all this
14:45
thing uh
14:47
and kind of pissed off at you know
14:48
essentially the obama administration
14:50
saying you know that guy’s running a
14:52
freaking coup so
14:54
that’s kind of the source of why this
14:56
has hit the press and
14:58
um in italy and kind of the source of
15:01
this distrust by the
15:03
italian government now and and why
15:05
they’re kind of taking the attitude that
15:07
they’ve taken
15:08
and how this is ending up in this guy
15:10
this reporter’s hands
15:12
and if i understand that channel tv
15:14
channel that he works for rtrete4
15:18
is a is a state-owned channel so
15:21
that that again adds a very interesting
15:24
aspect to this so
15:26
uh there’s some you know i’m gonna call
15:28
it official reporting
15:29
but i wouldn’t call it like totally like
15:31
unconnected unofficial reporting either
15:33
so it lends a lot of authenticity to
15:35
this
15:36
so uh we don’t have like the names of
15:39
the cia
15:40
agents and that isn’t something i
15:42
probably would say anyway
15:43
because if they’re undercover they’re
15:44
undercover shouldn’t be reported the
15:46
state department guy is probably more
15:48
fair game
15:49
don’t have his name or photographs or
15:50
anything either but from what i’m told
15:53
in italy
15:55
all that is being looked at and so
15:58
many of those details are going to start
15:59
to come out and
16:01
if you start having names and dates and
16:04
travel records and photographs and
16:05
surveillance tapes and
16:07
uh who knows if there’s audio recordings
16:09
and phone conversations and
16:11
satellite uplink data and stuff like
16:13
that if you start getting in stuff like
16:15
that
16:16
uh which like i say this is the type of
16:18
stuff that i’m hearing at
16:20
italy that’s coming so if that’s all
16:23
true that’s a freaking big deal because
16:26
that’s the whole organization of how
16:28
this was done
16:29
now behind the scenes again just
16:31
analyzing it
16:33
this would have to be
16:36
a thing if this is all true which
16:38
remains to be seen
16:40
but if this is all true in order to
16:42
organize something like this
16:46
it would have certainly had been
16:47
organized by cia
16:49
leadership almost as a whole
16:52
and also with elements within
16:56
state department uh you know i don’t
16:58
think the secretary of state mike pompeo
17:01
would have been involved but
17:02
uh certainly i hope not but i i don’t i
17:05
can’t see how that would be possible but
17:07
certainly elements within the state
17:10
department and everyone in the state
17:11
department is a big
17:12
democratic you know 97 of
17:15
of the people oregon state department
17:17
contribute to the democratic party and
17:19
they’re now republicans so
17:20
uh you know it would it would be easy to
17:22
stage something up from within
17:24
state department but if if all of this
17:27
is true
17:28
that means you had cia leadership
17:29
leadership
17:31
at the most senior levels you would have
17:33
the
17:34
state department elements at quite
17:36
senior levels
17:38
and it had been manipulated and
17:39
organized by somebody and one of the
17:41
things i’ve said all along with all of
17:43
all of this stuff is me personally i
17:46
think it all leads back to john brennan
17:49
former cia director john brennan who was
17:51
the obama
17:53
final the last obama cia director
17:56
followed by mike pompeo and then gina
17:57
haspel
17:58
so and gina haspel and john brennan are
18:01
close associates
18:03
so i i i look at all of this thing and
18:06
say that’s how it was orchestrated that
18:07
this was an obama
18:09
brennan operation
18:12
uh set up years ago after john brennan
18:15
was out
18:16
which again one of the things i always
18:18
point out is john brennan is just too
18:20
hate-filled it’s just not rational the
18:23
things that he says and talks about
18:25
uh president trump so there’s a reason
18:28
behind it you know what i mean if
18:29
there’s
18:29
it’s it’s the old shakespeare comment he
18:31
thinks the lady doth protest too much
18:33
it’s that sort of thing there’s the the
18:35
facts don’t support
18:37
brennan’s reactions to all this stuff
18:39
it’s too vehement
18:40
to filled with personal feelings of
18:42
hatred so
18:44
there’s something else behind it and i
18:46
think this is what it is
18:47
that that brennan feels he’s way out on
18:49
a limb because
18:50
he was you know if this is like i said
18:52
if this is all true
18:54
he would be you know kind of the the guy
18:55
at the center of the web
18:57
having organized all this for obama
19:00
and uh that would mean that you know he
19:02
was pushing all of this out
19:03
he used to travel all the time to italy
19:05
a lot of this stuff was
19:07
was uh well published and talked about
19:09
in in public forums
19:11
and as i said then it you match it up
19:13
with this
19:14
smoke screen that we’ve been seeing
19:16
about gina haspel being in germany being
19:17
wounded being dead being blah blah blah
19:19
blah you know it all just all these
19:21
circumstances fit
19:22
so when i came across this reporting
19:24
started looking at it and digging in a
19:26
little bit
19:27
i thought it was one of those aha
19:28
moments because here it is this is the
19:30
answer
19:31
this is how it was done and i think that
19:34
particularly over the next two weeks
19:36
all this is going to come out we’re
19:37
going to see that it was one gigantic
19:40
illegal coup attempt to by through
19:43
conducting this fraud now
19:45
the question is and what’s really
19:46
interesting out of all of this is how it
19:48
goes forward what would
19:50
what would happen if we do indeed prove
19:52
all this to be true
19:54
and that’s a very interesting question
19:56
because under the law we’re at this
19:58
what do we say the sixth to the fifth
20:00
today by you know
20:02
for civil suits all this stuff has to be
20:04
filed
20:05
and reviewed by a judge by the eighth at
20:08
the latest you know that’s only three
20:09
days away
20:10
none of this you know here’s the tip of
20:12
the iceberg the first guy to be talking
20:13
about this
20:14
in the u.s is you know me which
20:17
happens all the freaking time because
20:19
the press doesn’t report anything
20:20
anymore
20:21
um i’d have to say i think i do more
20:24
journalism than most of the
20:25
the news networks do on any more on
20:28
cable tv
20:29
but the uh the
20:33
you know as this as this unfolds how
20:36
would it rule out
20:37
and with the civil suit gone
20:40
and if if it had been if all of this was
20:42
taking place a month ago
20:44
they would have had time to file a
20:45
federal suit which was in all six states
20:48
as one
20:48
suit saying fraud and organized fraud
20:52
and it would have made its way up to the
20:53
supreme court and looked at you know the
20:55
evidence along the way
20:56
and if it was proven trump would win you
20:58
know he would have the election then at
21:00
that point
21:00
but that option is going to be gone on
21:02
the eighth in three days and
21:04
and it’s you don’t get it back so
21:06
therefore what happens then
21:08
now this is completely uncharted
21:09
territory so where will it go
21:11
and it it looks crim and clearly it
21:14
would be
21:14
criminal and very serious criminal i
21:17
mean it would be
21:18
sedition or treason or something along
21:20
those lines
21:22
and then there’d be also the question of
21:24
it would have to end up in the hands of
21:26
the
21:27
u.s attorney general barr the doj
21:28
department of justice
21:30
and what would he do with it so uh he
21:33
understands
21:34
i mean i don’t think he’s the trump
21:36
supporter that a lot of people make him
21:38
out to be
21:39
i don’t think he hates trump or loves
21:41
trump or
21:42
any of that i think he’s just like the
21:44
kind of
21:45
old-fashioned doj kind of guy
21:49
but he does understand regardless of any
21:51
of that
21:52
he understands that if he takes up a
21:54
case like that
21:55
he’s got to be able to prove it because
21:57
the fed conviction rate is what 97 98
22:00
or whatever so they don’t even take
22:02
cases unless they’re
22:03
really certain they’ve got everything
22:05
they need i mean it’s basically if you
22:06
get indicted by the feds
22:08
make a deal that’s kind of what you see
22:11
most people do
22:12
and so he’s going to have to feel
22:15
comfortable to that point because he’s
22:16
that sort of
22:17
old-fashioned guy that’s going to be his
22:19
attitude
22:20
and if you come up with an 80 case
22:24
i don’t think a guy like and this by the
22:26
way this i think is bad
22:28
but if you came up with an 80 case i
22:31
don’t think barr would go forward
22:32
for it i don’t think he would look at
22:34
this as you know
22:36
holy cow this is so freaking important
22:38
we have to take it to court and try to
22:40
prove this because this would be a coup
22:42
to overthrow the united states of
22:42
america
22:43
i think what he would do stupidly but
22:47
forgive me if i’m wrong but i think what
22:49
he would do stupidly is look at it and
22:50
say well this isn’t the fed case
22:52
that we would take forward i need that
22:54
you know 98
22:57
chance of getting a conviction case or
22:59
i’m not taking it forward
23:00
and and he would lose sight of the big
23:02
picture which is
23:03
you know holy this is a coup so uh
23:06
i mean those are that’s a couple
23:07
problems along the way that would have
23:09
to be overcome
23:11
as this unfolds and if these things are
23:13
proven true
23:14
as it goes forward so
23:17
and you know even if he did take it and
23:20
it was a criminal case
23:21
it’s it’s something that would take
23:22
months to get through so
23:25
what are you gonna do i mean biden will
23:26
have been uh sworn in at that point in
23:29
january
23:30
so what happens you know
23:33
biden on if this is true biden of course
23:36
knew
23:36
and there was that slip that he made
23:38
about how they have the
23:39
largest fraud organization and you know
23:42
how effective they are
23:44
and so i think it was swimming around in
23:45
there in that what’s left of the gray
23:47
matter
23:48
and he made that that slip and referring
23:51
to it not realizing
23:53
the importance of it and so if he knew
23:56
you know and his vp knew and the senior
23:59
democrats and the house and senate knew
24:03
uh you know i you know how could they
24:06
remain in power as a party
24:08
so i either the whole thing’s a freaking
24:10
mess this is all uncharted territory
24:12
uh i don’t i don’t know and of course
24:15
everything here
24:16
is going to be immediately referred to
24:18
as tinfoil hack crazy stuff
24:20
but like i said the facts are there the
24:22
reporting is coming out of italy
24:24
uh and everything matches up so it’s
24:26
it’s one of those things where
24:28
the left is going to argue well there’s
24:30
nothing there
24:32
you don’t have proof which i i grant you
24:33
what i’m suggesting here isn’t the proof
24:35
but i will say from all appearances
24:38
proof is coming
24:40
problem is the proof is coming slowly
24:43
so we’re not going to have it today so
24:45
the case could be filed in civil court
24:47
and all that stuff
24:48
so then what happens and you know you
24:51
know
24:52
what if we have all the proof in 30 days
24:55
or 60 days what then had
24:59
biden’s sworn in and then what happened
25:01
so anyway i i it’s
25:03
i mean they could always just
25:07
gently escort him back to his own house
25:10
i really doubt he’s going to notice a
25:11
difference by then
25:13
but the other thing it sounds to me if i
25:16
were to put this in summary
25:18
there’s a common logical fallacy that
25:20
people trade
25:21
amongst each other which is that
25:23
extraordinary claims require
25:24
extraordinary evidence
25:26
and that’s that’s simply not true every
25:29
the standard of evidence for any claim
25:31
is the same always
25:33
right always it’s the same because every
25:35
claim is extraordinary to somebody
25:38
so you know that yes and
25:41
the the like i say kind of the
25:43
interesting thing just to ping that
25:44
again for everyone
25:46
is that the italians were pissed off so
25:49
you stuck them in the eye with a stick
25:51
you piss them off and they see this
25:54
going on and they’re going on you know
25:56
f me fu sort of thing and this is what
25:59
you get
26:00
and and so like i say everything fits it
26:03
all makes sense so i mean it’s just one
26:05
of those things i look at
26:06
and i go you know this ring’s true if it
26:09
is
26:11
and if what they’re saying is true all
26:13
those data things are going to come out
26:15
and so if you have the
26:17
resources of the italian government
26:20
looking at this
26:21
this was not a u.s government effort
26:25
what this was was if true is
26:29
rogue elements of the u.s government
26:31
that’s not the u.s
26:33
government so properly
26:36
the italian government could have used
26:38
every resource at its disposal
26:40
to figure out what was going on and
26:43
it looks like that’s what they did so
26:46
therefore
26:48
i would say there’s a very good chance
26:51
that a lot of very incriminating
26:53
evidence comes out
26:54
i mean what if you know like i said we
26:56
haven’t identified these americans
26:57
involved
26:58
but what if we do or if you have
27:00
recorded conversations with those guys
27:02
saying
27:02
oh yeah okay you’re ready to manipulate
27:04
the data i mean i
27:06
i wouldn’t anticipate that but you never
27:07
know so as this unfolds and comes out
27:10
and
27:10
if you start having data like that you
27:12
know holy moly i mean just
27:16
other god what’s what will happen i i
27:18
don’t know i mean
27:19
i just don’t see how this could is going
27:20
to end up in any sort of pretty way
27:22
you’re not going to see the democrats
27:24
lay down and take it even when the even
27:26
when the case is just absolutely solid
27:28
and they’re going to court and people
27:29
are getting arrested
27:30
going to jail uh you know they’re
27:33
they’re
27:34
they’re gonna say no it’s we’re still
27:35
the party of the president here so
27:37
well it’s something at some point it all
27:39
boils down to the consent of the
27:41
governed
27:42
and if enough evidence shows up that
27:43
this election was stolen
27:45
the democrats are going to lose that so
27:47
it’s going to be a very difficult
27:48
presidency
27:50
i agree i agree with that and couldn’t
27:52
be overturned all together
27:53
you know again it’s uncharted territory
27:55
so just i would say
27:57
nobody knows for sure i mean depending
27:59
on the nature of of this evidence if
28:01
indeed it all comes
28:02
out over the next two weeks but i’m
28:05
telling you right now i think it’s all
28:06
going to come out of the next two weeks
28:07
so
28:08
that’s what i’m being told so we’ll see
28:11
thank you very much brad
28:12
uh it’s gonna be i guess there’s no re
28:15
there’s no immediate relief in sight
28:17
then we have to wait another two weeks
28:19
to discover whether or not the
28:21
information is solid and
28:23
if it is whether or not it will have any
28:24
meaning these are difficult it’s going
28:26
to be a difficult couple weeks thanks
28:27
again brad
28:42
[Music]
28:57
[Music]
29:16
[Music]
29:21
you
[/expander_maker]
