https://intelreform.org/2020/12/15/swalwell-and-the-chinese-honey-trap/
https://intelreform.org/2018/08/14/big-league-politics-interview-with-retired-cia-officer-brad-johnson-on-chinese-spy-within-the-senator-feinstein-organization/
[expander_maker id=”8″ more=”Click for entire transcript” less=”Read less”]
[Music]
00:05
so
00:06
this is january the 15th of 2021
00:11
uh you know it’s difficult to follow
00:14
what’s going on in the state so far
00:16
uh politically sure looks to me like
00:19
there was a massive set up
00:21
uh to make it false was the right tag
00:24
fire
00:25
false flag at the capitol buildings
00:28
and uh that appears to have been an
00:30
excuse
00:31
to do a second impeachment i have to say
00:34
that’s
00:35
to quote a twitter a tweet i saw that’s
00:37
pretty badass that trump got impeached
00:39
twice it kind of makes me admire him
00:41
even more
00:42
uh he must be one hell of a threat but i
00:44
what i
00:45
before you you know the update is can
00:47
you explain a bit what impeachment is
00:49
because
00:49
you know i kind of had the impression
00:51
that if you were impeached as a
00:52
president you no longer had any power
00:54
like you weren’t president
00:55
so i guess that’s not what it was and
00:58
how do you get in peace twice i just
00:59
don’t get it
01:00
can you explain all that please well you
01:02
have to be convicted of the impeachment
01:04
if you’re convicted then you’re thrown
01:05
out of the office of presidency
01:07
so in this particular case it’s kind of
01:10
uh you know it’s
01:11
it’s clearly there is a second agenda
01:14
here
01:15
since the impeachment can’t even be
01:18
completed in the process it’d have to be
01:20
passed in the
01:21
you know they voted to impeach him they
01:23
had 10 republicans
01:24
uh join with the democrats to to vote to
01:28
impeach the president and then it has to
01:29
be
01:31
tried the house puts on a a
01:34
supposedly a trial for the uh
01:38
everybody to watch but then the senate
01:39
has to vote on it and they have to
01:41
uh they have to i think it’s a
01:43
two-thirds majority then
01:44
has to vote for impeachment i i don’t
01:47
think that is a
01:48
a number that can be achieved without
01:49
quite a few republican
01:51
uh republicans joining in but you know i
01:54
don’t know in this day and age almost
01:55
anything is possible
01:56
once he’s impeached then he’s thrown out
01:58
as president of course this cannot be
02:00
completed as i was saying
02:02
before trump is out on the 20th the 20th
02:05
is only five days away this is the 15th
02:07
so the the new president will be
02:09
inaugurated
02:10
so after trump has already gone from
02:13
office
02:14
can he be impeached you know that
02:16
question hasn’t really been answered and
02:17
i’m not sure he can
02:19
but if he is somehow impeached
02:24
sometime after leaving office as
02:26
president
02:27
what it does is it blocks him from
02:29
running for president again
02:31
supposedly but i’m again this this
02:35
raises a lot of questions in my mind
02:37
if you’re impeached when you’re not
02:38
president you know i
02:40
is it legitimately going to stop you
02:42
from running for federal office again
02:44
and you know i i just don’t know i mean
02:46
this is going to be kind of new
02:47
territory
02:48
but as i said it’s clearly a hindi
02:51
hidden agenda item or a second agenda
02:53
item
02:54
and nancy pelosi has said very openly
02:56
and now there’s a lot of other people
02:58
coming in and saying
02:59
very openly that this is to stop
03:01
president trump for running president
03:03
for president again in 2024. so the only
03:07
reason they’re doing it is because
03:09
they they’ve they’ve cheated to get him
03:10
out and now they want to make sure he
03:12
never has a chance to set it right so
03:14
that’s what’s going on with it now some
03:16
of the
03:17
the irony in all of this is just
03:21
you know astounding to me because
03:24
who’s in charge of the impeachment and
03:26
of course
03:27
it’s a the majority democrats in the
03:29
house so they run the show so they put
03:32
whoever in charge that they want of the
03:34
impeachment process
03:36
and who is it it’s congressman swalwell
03:39
congressman swalwell is the guy that was
03:42
sleeping with the russian
03:44
uh spy who was funneling money into his
03:47
campaign
03:48
so you’ve got this guy that’s been
03:50
cooperating to some degree or another
03:52
with chinese espionage who’s in charge
03:55
of the impeachment
03:56
and i just it’s just beyond
04:00
me so here you have this thing
04:04
this impeachment that’s turning out to
04:06
be between
04:08
do you want to give the guy who was
04:11
arguably the best president we’ve ever
04:14
had
04:15
certainly for the economy of the united
04:17
states
04:18
and for how he handled foreign relations
04:21
and fighting back against china for u.s
04:23
interests and all those sorts of things
04:24
you have arguably the best president of
04:26
the united states
04:28
so you can either vote for him or
04:31
you can vote for a guy cooperating with
04:33
chinese spies with a lot with a
04:35
democratic party that’s closely
04:36
associated with china
04:38
with a president that’s coming in whose
04:39
son was disposed supposedly and not
04:42
negotiating for a 10 million vibe with
04:43
china and dianne feinstein who
04:46
is has made over i don’t know three or
04:48
four hundred million dollars with china
04:50
through her husband
04:51
and had a chinese spy on her staff
04:54
so it it it looks like you either vote
04:57
for
04:57
china or you vote for trump who was an
05:01
excellent president united states
05:03
and it’s the irony of all of this is
05:05
just astounding to me
05:07
but one thing i want to say to you to
05:10
any listener to the american public in
05:11
particular
05:12
and this is a little bit dry but i would
05:14
like to go through very quickly
05:16
one of the things that we need to do is
05:18
oh one last thing too on that
05:20
before i get into the list one of the
05:23
things that’s happened
05:24
is now everybody saw that vice president
05:26
trump our vice president pence stabbed
05:28
trump in the back
05:29
refused to support him to try to get all
05:31
of this stuff in front of the public
05:33
where everybody could see
05:35
the different things that were irregular
05:36
about these votes that took place
05:38
and the voting changes that they used
05:41
that aren’t allowed by those laws of
05:43
that state
05:44
they did it anyway so a lot of this
05:46
stuff was just flat out illegal
05:48
and that was the guy that stabbed him in
05:50
the back was vp pence
05:52
already you’re seeing them try to prop
05:54
up pence
05:55
and newt gingrich came out was saying
05:57
that pence was a profiling courage and
05:59
this great man and all this
06:00
and now today you’re having a lot more
06:02
people come out they’re already pumping
06:04
him up and building him as the candidate
06:06
for 2024 and every loyal
06:10
patriot in the united states of america
06:12
needs to make sure
06:14
that pence understands he’s toast
06:16
politically
06:17
because that that type of behavior
06:20
should not be rewarded and the same
06:22
thing for the 10 republicans
06:24
i just want to mention that also voted
06:27
for impeachment
06:28
there’s one uh herrera in washington
06:31
state
06:32
uh if in the third district if you’re in
06:35
the third district call in and
06:37
let him know that you know he’s that
06:38
you’re going to try to get him out next
06:40
election
06:40
uh capco out of new york in the 24th
06:44
district
06:45
kissinger and 16th district in illinois
06:49
uh peter meyer in michigan third
06:52
district
06:53
a new house in the fourth district in
06:56
washington state again
06:57
uh south carolina tom wright seventh
07:00
district
07:01
and fred upton michigan sixth district
07:04
uh vallado valladol in california david
07:07
valladel
07:08
21st district in california all of these
07:11
guys
07:12
are people that if you’re from those
07:14
districts please call in
07:16
give them heck over the phone now it’s
07:18
very important
07:20
don’t be rude or aggressive or
07:22
threatening or any of those things
07:23
because they won’t listen to you and
07:25
they won’t tabulate it
07:26
but if you’re polite and firm and just
07:29
let them know
07:30
that you find that despicable and it
07:31
shouldn’t have been done and that
07:33
recognition has to be given to president
07:35
trump for the economy
07:36
for what he did protecting u.s interests
07:39
for what he did on kovid
07:40
you start pushing those sorts of things
07:42
of the what trump has done
07:44
that’s right and they’ll listen and put
07:45
that down and they take those things
07:47
into account
07:48
they actually have formulas where they
07:50
calculate so many people calling in
07:52
represents
07:52
this amount of the public and therefore
07:54
i need to take it into account when it
07:56
reaches a certain threshold
07:58
so if anyone’s interested in doing that
08:00
and you’re from those districts
08:01
they will listen to you if you’re polite
08:04
and to the point you’ll only be talking
08:06
to some like intern or something
08:08
you won’t talk to anybody that’s
08:10
important but they will tabulate what
08:12
you say
08:13
so it does make a difference and that’s
08:15
one of the ways that we can begin to
08:17
fight back on this but
08:18
like i said this is boiling down to
08:21
whose side are you on
08:22
are you on team america
08:26
or are you on team washington and china
08:30
and i think that’s that’s what this is
08:32
boiled down to there’s
08:33
so much corruption so closely tied to
08:36
china
08:36
out of the democratic party that it’s
08:38
kind of confusing who
08:40
they really represent and these are the
08:42
ways that we can start to fight back
08:44
that’s legal and ethical that we can do
08:46
and it’s make them pay the political
08:48
price
08:49
so i’m hoping that this is one of the
08:50
things that will gain some popularity
08:52
and people will start to move
08:54
and start to try and make make it
08:56
possible for us to get a responsible
08:58
government and responsible
09:00
representatives in our states
09:02
so there’s a video i have to ask you
09:04
there’s a video that’s circulating
09:06
a number of people sent in to me four or
09:08
five at least
09:09
of general mchenry i believe probably
09:11
saying his name wrong but
09:13
general mchenry mcinerney who
09:16
is explaining things about the laptop
09:19
which i
09:20
have some trouble understanding how they
09:22
could be true
09:24
because if in fact special forces had
09:27
taken her laptop
09:28
it seems to me that it would be outside
09:31
of like you couldn’t go to a court of
09:32
law
09:33
and say and present anything that they
09:36
found on it
09:36
because there was no warrant there was
09:38
no i mean it wasn’t taken
09:40
in the normal course of affairs unless
09:42
there’s some special provision
09:44
i mean uh can you can you speak to
09:46
general mckenna
09:47
mchenry’s claims mcinerney yeah
09:50
it’s it’s uh there’s there actually is
09:53
uh oddly enough uh a
09:55
uh i i don’t know if special provision
09:58
in the law is the right way to describe
09:59
it but there is a
10:01
part of the law that if i have proof
10:05
that you did something illegal and uh
10:08
i get that to the court i give it to the
10:11
court
10:12
it doesn’t matter how it got to court
10:14
that’s the way the laws work if it’s
10:16
proof of guilt
10:17
they’ll use it in that court even if it
10:20
was obtained illegally by me or
10:22
something now
10:22
that’s not law enforcement not following
10:24
the rules of evidence and all of that
10:26
that’s a separate thing
10:27
but if if someone if just some person
10:30
gets it
10:30
then and it ends up in court it can
10:32
still be used as evidence
10:34
now the problem with that is that if i
10:37
stole it
10:38
and then walk into the court and go hi
10:40
judge i stole this here it is this
10:42
proves this guy’s guilty
10:44
i then also face the penalty of law
10:46
because i stole it that’s illegal
10:48
and there would be a price to pay for me
10:50
so if this is true and i’ve heard many
10:52
of these rumors and seen these
10:54
these stories as well and and i’ve heard
10:56
that it was a
10:57
a special forces op that they went in
10:59
and they planned all along to get the
11:01
laptop
11:02
they went in and got it got out and that
11:03
they have people that are experts
11:05
exploiting these things and that they’re
11:07
putting together whatever’s on there and
11:08
i’m hearing rumors of
11:10
there’s all sorts of wild and crazy
11:11
stuff on there
11:13
so i’m hearing all of this stuff but
11:15
proof is in the pudding you know when
11:16
it’s out there we’ll we’ll see
11:19
also there’s a video kind of
11:20
interestingly along these same lines
11:22
there’s a video of a guy who’s an antifa
11:24
black lives matter activist
11:26
who was one of the people that invaded
11:27
the capitol building was telling people
11:29
hey
11:29
let’s burn this place down and taking
11:31
videos of it and all of that now
11:33
he is one of the people that’s been
11:35
arrested for
11:37
breaking into the capitol building and
11:39
has
11:40
separately confessed to being antifa
11:43
black lives matter and so we we know who
11:45
he was so we know
11:47
at least in part those people that
11:50
invaded the capitol building over which
11:51
there’s been such a fur
11:53
were not trump supporters there was at
11:55
least an element of people within them
11:58
that were antifa and black lives matter
12:00
people
12:01
trying to masquerade as trump supporters
12:04
in order to create this problem so it’s
12:06
not an open and shut thing now
12:09
that has been played on cnn and some
12:11
other places they’ve
12:12
they’ve identified this guy and
12:14
interviewed him where he was talking
12:15
about some of this stuff so
12:17
it’s an interesting change in the in the
12:19
story that’s being told
12:21
uh it’ll be suppressed here eventually
12:22
by mainstream media because they don’t
12:24
they can’t allow the
12:25
truth to come out but uh it is an
12:28
interesting aspect to it so
12:29
we’ll see about this this uh nancy
12:32
pelosi
12:33
laptop there hasn’t been confirmation
12:36
that i’ve seen of any official kind
12:38
that the laptop was even stolen however
12:41
there’s a lot of
12:42
kind of circumstantial evidence which
12:44
convinces me it’s true
12:46
like apparently they went after a hotel
12:48
where they thought these guys might be
12:49
holed up
12:50
and secured the perimeter not letting
12:52
people out until they could go in and
12:53
look
12:54
and stuff like that so interesting just
12:56
by the way the fellow’s name is john
12:58
sullivan
12:59
the guy who’s already now facing charges
13:03
who is a blm slash antifa activist
13:07
that uh he actually encouraged other
13:09
people
13:10
to break into the capital and it turns
13:12
out there was also
13:13
a cnn reporter that was on scene too so
13:16
that’s interesting
13:17
yes exactly right uh yeah so we’ll see
13:20
how all of this plays out
13:22
and uh like i said for anyone that’s
13:24
that’s that is an answer it was not all
13:26
trump supporters
13:27
in fact it was the opposite it was trump
13:29
detractors at least in part
13:49
[Music]
14:08
[Music]
14:12
you
[/expander_maker]
