It is not at all appropriate for the Intelligence Community to offer conclusions about the origins of COVID, says Brad Johnson, retired senior CIA Operative and President of Americans for Intelligence Reform. Yet that is what the Director of Intelligence did by stating they agree with the “conclusion” it is not man made. Why? Their job is to collect intelligence, report it to the government leadership and step back. The government decides what to do with the information. Further, it is the job of the scientific community to determine the truth. Instead, the IC leans to the leftist protection of the Chinese Communist Party wishing to exonerate it. They offers no proof of their conclusion either. A.I.R. aims to put the Intelligence Community back where it belongs – collecting information through espionage and objectively reporting it. The left leaning conclusions have to stop. Trump knows this and wants it stopped too.
https://youtu.be/EF2ZgV593fM
[expander_maker id=”8″ more=”Click here for entire transcript” less=”Read less”]
00:00
Brad Johnson it is May the 2nd of 2020
00:03
and the US government in the space of
00:06
about two weeks has both confirmed or if
00:10
not confirmed strongly strongly hinted
00:14
that this virus was an artifact that was
00:16
man-made in the Wuhan lab and then
00:19
strongly flatly denied it saying that
00:22
the intelligence community all said that
00:25
it’s it’s a naturally occurring thing
00:27
but this should be right up your alley
00:29
tell us what’s going on here please yes
00:32
and it’s it’s interesting I mean well
00:35
and as you noted there the last sort of
00:38
entry into this book of flip-flops
00:40
around on the information that’s out
00:42
there or I you say better yet it’s it’s
00:44
not it’s conflicting information and
00:46
what we’re getting is a lot of
00:47
conflicting information everything to do
00:49
with come in nineteen as is is changing
00:53
and evolving constantly and there’s good
00:56
reasons in some cases like the Chinese
00:58
we all know they lie so we all know the
01:00
information coming out of it was bad
01:01
from the get-go and but unfortunately
01:03
here particularly the United States
01:05
we’re seeing a lot of that as well
01:06
because we’re getting just diametrically
01:08
opposed information coming out on on
01:11
this conflicting information the latest
01:13
thing that came out was a unanimous
01:16
declaration by the intelligence
01:18
community that the code 19 was not any
01:22
sort of man-made artifact meaning that
01:25
it’s a naturally occurring disease now
01:27
just going back on this I to me this is
01:31
one of those things where one of the big
01:36
problems we’ve seen out of the
01:37
intelligence community is that that we
01:40
can’t really believe or trust what they
01:42
say and this is one of the things the
01:44
president United States has referred to
01:46
a number of times and this is just kind
01:48
of another iteration of it and when say
01:50
10 to 10 days ago the information was
01:52
out there that there were good
01:54
indications that this is in fact
01:55
man-made and that there are there is
01:57
evidence that it’s man-made
01:59
and the problem with this whole argument
02:01
is that there’s lots of medical people
02:04
out there doctors that work on biology
02:07
and all of these things that are saying
02:08
wait a minute you know this looks
02:10
man-made why are you saying it isn’t and
02:12
this looks man-made why are you saying
02:14
it isn’t and then you sit down and kind
02:16
of dig through the responses and you
02:19
know you you look at them and many of
02:22
them are kind of political responses in
02:25
natures so most of the people that are
02:28
out there saying that coded 19 is not
02:32
man-made or all of the same people that
02:35
were saying that coded 19 was from the
02:39
wet market in China now that’s become
02:43
clear it’s all it’s conclusive now and
02:45
everybody has come out and said that the
02:48
in fact escaped out of that mu hand
02:50
level 4 lab in China so all of them were
02:55
saying that was wrong before and now
02:57
everybody’s agreed pretty universally
02:59
that it’s right you still have a few
03:00
kind of hardcore political types that
03:02
fight that but not really much of
03:04
anybody else so now we have them kind of
03:06
saying now well even though there was
03:07
evidence before now there’s no evidence
03:09
and it there’s no proof of it well you
03:12
know I’m not sure that the intelligence
03:14
community is the place to fight that up
03:16
to begin with I mean my take on it is
03:18
you know who the heck are you guys to
03:20
even have an opinion why are you you
03:23
know even even suggesting that you know
03:25
or don’t know I mean you have you know
03:28
three or four people inside the MU Han
03:30
lab level four or a spy’s reporting back
03:33
to us because if you did then even then
03:35
you shouldn’t be talking about it you
03:37
should be reporting it to the leadership
03:38
of the United States and let them figure
03:40
out what to do with the information so
03:42
it’s just one of those things where I
03:44
just I just don’t it’s very odd to have
03:46
them even comment on this those things
03:49
should be handled in medical channels I
03:51
mean natural Institute for health or
03:53
something or you know those those sorts
03:56
of people the Surgeon General I mean
03:58
those guys having a pen
03:59
on it but they should also be held to
04:02
the same standard that all scientists
04:04
and research institutes are held to give
04:06
us your information let us look at it
04:09
let everybody see it I mean a lot of
04:11
this stuff can be figured out by just
04:12
general people and there’s plenty
04:14
thousands and thousands of people that
04:17
know a great deal of medical information
04:18
doctors and researchers and things here
04:21
in the United States now what we have
04:23
and my real problem with all of this is
04:25
if you look at who’s saying all of this
04:28
stuff all along Oh freak of nature came
04:31
from a bat in the wet market and then
04:32
oops okay that’s wrong okay well now
04:34
it’s not it’s not a man-made thing it’s
04:36
just naturally occurring in yes it
04:37
escaped out of that new handle yeah but
04:39
that’s not suspicious it’s just you know
04:41
happened to escape and it was a
04:42
naturally occurring thing that they were
04:43
studying they were looking for cures so
04:45
all of those people who are saying that
04:47
are following China communist propaganda
04:50
line and all of the people that are
04:53
saying it have a political axe to grind
04:55
they all have that in common and we’ve
04:58
seen over and over and over that the
05:00
intelligence community is deeply
05:02
political and has been very much
05:04
webinars so essentially what they are
05:08
doing is they’re looking at intelligence
05:10
and information that’s out there and it
05:12
goes through the prism of their
05:14
political perspective and out the other
05:16
incomes whatever it is that they’re
05:18
after political consideration whatever
05:21
they’ve concluded okay that’s a problem
05:23
from the get-go
05:24
I mean intelligences should have nothing
05:26
whatsoever to do with politics it’s go
05:28
find out the truth report it and then
05:30
it’s not your problem
05:31
let the politicians be politicians to do
05:34
whatever they’re gonna do with it but
05:35
your job is to stay out of all of that
05:37
and just report the facts and that’s
05:39
just not what we’re seeing anymore and
05:41
this is why they’ve become essentially
05:43
obsolete I mean they just completely
05:44
need to be done from top to bottom and
05:46
we’ve talked about that in in other
05:47
interviews but this coding thing is a
05:49
demonstration of that once again they’re
05:51
commenting areas they shouldn’t be why
05:54
do all the entire elegant intelligence
05:56
community have an opinion to begin with
05:58
I mean none of this makes any sense and
06:01
okay if you’re so certain of it fine
06:02
let’s see your information that’s not
06:04
classified these things are all being
06:06
discussed in public that that
06:08
it’s being shared worldwide fine put it
06:10
out on the table intelligence community
06:12
if you’ve got such a you know ironclad
06:15
opinion on it let’s see why where is it
06:18
you know don’t just say oh I concluded
06:19
this you know great you know we’re so
06:22
glad you’ve made that conclusion but
06:24
nobody gives a flying rats are in what
06:25
you conclude let’s see your proof
06:27
let’s see your evidence let’s see why
06:28
you conclude this because that’s not
06:30
classified that’s not coming out of
06:31
classified information let’s see the
06:33
studies put it on the table and nobody’s
06:35
doing it nobody and none of the
06:37
reporters are asking about it either
06:39
now on the other side of this who do we
06:42
see coming out saying we’ll wait a
06:43
minute look at this look at this look at
06:44
this look at this and these are all
06:46
independent doctors and researchers and
06:48
people like that that have the
06:49
background so the independent people
06:51
that don’t have a voice in in government
06:55
and don’t have a voice in that process
06:56
and don’t have a political axe to grind
06:58
those are the guys that are out there
07:01
saying well wait a minute you know I
07:02
have questions on this this looks to me
07:05
like it’s man-made because of this
07:07
they’re putting their information out on
07:09
the table so who do you want to believe
07:10
on this and this is my question this is
07:12
a standard standard intelligence sort of
07:15
reaction to stuff is what’s your source
07:17
and if you want to believe politicians
07:20
with a political axe to grind or
07:22
organizations that are deeply political
07:24
that have motives for saying what they
07:26
say then and and are not presenting any
07:29
evidence then that’s the story we’re
07:31
getting out of the intelligence
07:32
community if you want to believe the
07:34
people that are independent that don’t
07:35
have an axe to grind don’t have a
07:37
political axe to grind and they’re
07:38
providing their this information at risk
07:41
to themselves you know those are by far
07:44
more credible so I put far more weight
07:46
on those guys than I do on what we’re
07:48
hearing out of the government now
07:50
President Trump aside I love all of this
07:52
because President Trump is kind of
07:54
between a rock and a hard spot on this
07:56
and he’s trying to fight his way forward
07:58
as best as he can into extraordinary
08:00
interesting thing I you know I believe
08:02
we should all try to support President
08:04
Trump as best we can in this mess
08:06
because he’s got you know he’s not a
08:08
scientist he doesn’t know you know
08:10
viruses and the
08:11
you know what’s the truth and what’s not
08:12
based on just what he sees in front of
08:14
him so he’s he’s relying on these people
08:17
and he doesn’t have anybody else to rely
08:19
upon so he’s he stuck and you know
08:22
trying to do the best he can now he sees
08:23
the damage being done by everybody being
08:26
isolated the higher rates of suicides
08:28
and the economy going down and people
08:30
losing their jobs and livelihood and it
08:32
has impact out into the future ripple
08:34
effect out into the future so he’s
08:36
trying to get that back on track as best
08:37
he can kind of holding off everybody all
08:40
around him so again at the at this level
08:43
of just people talking but you know
08:45
everybody should try to support the
08:46
president because as far as I can tell
08:49
other than like independent doctors the
08:51
scientists are talking about Co in 19
08:53
he’s the only guy out there actually
08:54
trying to do the right thing for the
08:56
right reasons and you nobody else seems
08:59
to be they all seem to have some you
09:01
know political ideological ax to grind
09:03
what why could you have any kind of
09:07
direct idea as to why the intelligence
09:10
community would come out and make a
09:11
statement like that as you say totally
09:14
counter intuitively since it’s not the
09:15
kind of thing they should be reporting
09:17
on and considering that French Nobel
09:19
Prize winners in medicine are quite
09:21
confident that it was man-made yeah I
09:24
mean and that’s the thing I mean there’s
09:25
a there’s a large body of people who
09:27
think it was man-made and they present
09:29
their evidence and that’s another
09:30
example of exactly that and they’re
09:32
talking about why they think it and you
09:34
don’t hear anybody in the government
09:35
gonna know that’s wrong because of this
09:36
you know you just don’t see that which
09:39
again you know if you’re not willing to
09:40
pummel up your evidence and you’re
09:41
probably you know full of BS and if you
09:44
are putting up your evidence okay then
09:45
that’s your genuine opinion and you’re
09:47
telling us why so who you know obvious
09:49
who to believe now intelligence
09:50
community one of the things we’ve seen I
09:52
mean that you’d have to be from another
09:54
planet– or an alternate universe not to
09:57
be aware of the fact that the
09:59
intelligence community as as as probably
10:03
a whole I mean another some exceptions
10:06
to this I would maybe and it doesn’t
10:09
matter but certainly we’ve seen elements
10:11
of the intelligence community target
10:13
president Trump both before he became
10:16
candidate once he became Canada
10:18
and then once he became president United
10:20
States and you know we’ve all discussed
10:22
this but we’ve seen elements out of them
10:23
until military elements out of NSA
10:26
elements out of the CIA Ellen’s out of
10:28
FBI elements out of DOJ that’s a big
10:31
chunk of people right in there that have
10:34
been used or were actively trying to
10:37
target President Trump in one way or
10:39
another so again this is this
10:41
politicization I often talk about and
10:44
the weaponization of the intelligence
10:46
community so if you step back and
10:48
analyze it from that perspective I think
10:49
it’s conclusive that their political and
10:54
their political supporting the left so
10:57
why is the left just nationwide
11:01
supporting this concept of it wasn’t
11:04
China’s fault you know that they didn’t
11:06
create this thing on purpose and it’s
11:09
just I think it’s kind of the socialist
11:11
international side deals in many ways
11:13
they just don’t want to go against a
11:15
fellow left-wing you know in this case
11:19
communist dictatorship but they just
11:20
don’t want to go against it but
11:22
philosophically I think this is one of
11:23
those things where the Left views this
11:25
as an opportunity to advance their
11:27
agenda and at the same time trying to
11:29
take out President Trump I there’s just
11:32
no question in my mind that this
11:33
destruction of the economy that’s taking
11:36
place while there is elements of it that
11:39
are truthful trying to save people and
11:41
there are people who are genuinely
11:43
concerned about the health of the people
11:45
there’s also a law a large swath of
11:48
people who are taking advantage of it
11:50
politically and what was the great
11:51
strength of the President President
11:52
Trump it was the economy and so to
11:55
damage the economy to them furthers
11:58
their political goals so the
12:00
intelligence community deeply entrenched
12:01
with the left are fighting for those
12:05
goals they’re fighting to support the
12:07
Democratic Party they don’t care about
12:09
the American people this is one of the
12:10
things I say often we cannot have that
12:13
out of the intelligence community the
12:15
intelligence community needs to be
12:17
completely separate walled off from all
12:20
of that stuff so that the information
12:22
they’re bringing in is unbiased pure
12:24
information reported up the chain of
12:26
command
12:27
and then just keep the hell out of it
12:29
and go on and get the next important
12:32
information data that’s out there to get
12:33
and let the politicians decide what they
12:37
do with it and then they can get
12:38
reelected or not based on their handling
12:41
of the situation that’s how it has to be
12:43
it’s extraordinarily dangerous to see
12:45
this happen
12:46
this is going to be changed very soon
12:48
again something we’ve talked about but
12:50
there are major indictments coming out
12:53
very serious ones that night as I said
12:55
many times these charges that are going
12:58
to come out are approaching the level of
13:00
treason with how fights it was handled
13:03
all of these things we’ve talked about
13:04
everyone’s seen the news about general
13:06
Flynn it’s clear now that you had actual
13:09
FBI and DOJ high-level officials
13:13
railroading this guy lying cheating and
13:16
in order to get rid of Flynn and all for
13:21
political motives and that is absolutely
13:23
the worst possible outcome for what we
13:26
need in the United States for what we’re
13:28
getting in the United States so I think
13:31
it’s just another clear case of this
13:34
politicization and weaponization of the
13:36
intelligence community because as I said
13:38
they shouldn’t be in this arena playing
13:40
at all this should be left to the you
13:42
know the medical people and scientists
13:45
and you know the intelligence community
13:47
find go collect I mean if you if you’re
13:49
finding something that somebody else is
13:50
doing out there and great but again that
13:52
isn’t for you to make the opinion on
13:54
that’s for you to pass to the government
13:57
officials who are in charge of that
13:58
stuff like I said National Institute of
14:00
Health or the Surgeon General or you
14:02
know those sorts of people that they
14:05
need that information because they’ll
14:07
have all of the information to look at
14:09
and that’s not up to them it’s not up to
14:11
the intelligence community’s data a
14:13
decision from the military and the FBI
14:15
or the DOJ
14:16
yeah and I say you know it’s just it’s
14:18
not up to them so stay the heck out of
14:21
it you know shut up and do your job
14:23
soldier on bring the information in pass
14:25
it off and then you know go off to the
14:26
next mission
[/expander_maker]