Published in Italian Newspaper Dag-Spia on December 3, 2020
THERE WAS THE ITALIAN JOB – TRUMP LAWYERS HAVE NO DOUBTS: “ AN ITALIAN HAND IN THE PRO BIDEN FRAUD ”. ALLEGED VOTE MANIPULATOR SOFTWARE MADE BY MEN OF THE US EMBASSY WITH AN (Italian) DEFENSE COMPANY. EVERYTHING WOULD HAPPEN THROUGH WHAT IS CALLED A “MILITARY ENCRYPTION”, THEREFORE MILITARY CODES AND CRYPTOGRAPHIES TO PROTECT CERTAIN OPERATIONS AND MAKE THEM DIFFICULTLY DECODED
Daniele Capezzone for “the Truth”
The news, if confirmed in its details, is sensational. Rome and Italy would also have been involved in the potentially most serious and sensational spy story of recent years, namely in the possible manipulation of the result of the last US presidential elections. This is what the legal team of the Trump campaign is investigating, in an investigation which, after a very noisy stop in Germany (which La Verità spoke about yesterday), had another fundamental moment of investigation in Rome.
It is even obvious to speculate that Donald Trump’s detractors will say that this is another installment of the current president’s post-election show, and will invoke evidence that Trump’s legal team believes they can make public in the coming days.
Let’s remember the starting point. Sidney Powell, the lawyer who with Rudy Giuliani leads Trump’s legal team, and who already has the defense of General Michael Flynn to her credit, has been pointing her finger for days at a telematic tool designed with the explicit purpose of shifting votes from a candidate to the other, obviously to the detriment of Trump. This electoral software may have also been used remotely by other countries to intervene on the tabulation of ballot papers.
Yesterday we talked about Dominion voting systems, founded in Canada, whose equipment and software are used in over 20 US states. And also yesterday we evoked the sensational mystery relating to the German city of Frankfurt, the scene of a seizure of computer equipment according to a first hypothesis to the detriment of Dominion (which he denies), according to another hypothesis to the detriment of the Spanish electoral software company Scytl ( which denies in turn), and finally according to a third hypothesis against a server farm managed by the CIA and the subject of an alleged sensational raid (complete with a firefight) by men of the Special Forces of the US army, according to the statements made by lieutenant general Thomas McInerney.
On the other hand, there is the latest investigative track on which the Trump campaign declares itself at an advanced stage of investigation: a part of the presumed electoral switch, that is the mechanism for moving votes by manipulating the results, would have been thought (perhaps since last spring) and then also carried out by Italy, through a triangulation between a US official operating at the US embassy in Rome (a hypothesis that, if confirmed, would obviously not remain without consequences), military figures of the highest level, and collaboration technique of an Italian company in the defense sector.
Everything would have happened through what is called a military encryption, therefore military codes and encryption to protect certain operations and make them difficult to decrypt.
Now, of course, it must be pointed out that the burden of proof rests on the Trump campaign and its lawyers.
But there remains much more than the feeling that Italy is anything but a marginal reality even in this story. We will remember the missions in Rome, in 2019, of attorney general William Barr, of the prosecutor John Durham, and of Gina Haspel, director of the CIA. At the time, particularly in coincidence with the visits of Barr (Minister of Justice, therefore a well-rounded politician), the status asymmetry of the Italian interlocutors towards which Conte directed him, that is the top of our services, leapt to the eye. , and not political counterparts of equal rank with respect to the host. Someone hypothesized that Conte, at the time, had wanted to act – politically speaking – on the quiet, on the sly, to give Trump the feeling (but perhaps only that) of a very rapid and concrete collaboration. Others argue instead that there has been no concrete Italian cooperation.
The US investigative thesis was known, regarding the Italian side of the so-called Russiagate: namely that in Rome, in 2016, some little hands had helped to fabricate phony evidence against the then candidate Trump, to invent a political relationship with Moscow and make it the basis of a judicial attack (which then, once Trump was elected, materialized in a rejected attempt of impeachment).
For months, the Italian media have persisted in keeping the story down. Even following a joint conference with Sergio Mattarella, when Donald Trump himself evoked a chain of corruption originating from the Obama administration and said in no uncertain terms: “There has been an attempt to hide what has been done in some countries and one of these it could be Italy », even then our mainstream media preferred to concentrate on the story of the grimaces and smilies of the Italian interpreter: yet another mass distraction.
We’ll see if it goes the same way again this time. And we will also see, always assuming that the legal team of the Trump campaign details and circumscribes the accusations, if some thread – objective or subjective – emerges to link the events of 2016 to those of this 2020, even in their Italian side.
Link to article: